/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53057178
Why would holding an asset down 90% upset anyone who doesn't hold it?

>>53057220
You tell me, bro, why does it get under your skin so bad? I’m just some random guy buying some silly little internet cubes. We’ll almost certainly never meet. Why would you let that affect your day?

>>53057178
I staked 10,000, 25% of my stack. You could have staked more than 7k with multiple wallets, anon.

>>53057220
i have no idea man but if you post thank you chainlinkgod based king it causes a massive amount of seeth

>>53057225
It doesn't bother me, but it does seem to bother you. Hence you making this thread.

>>53057178
Staked only 3k and swinging the rest of the stack. Going to buy back some at 10 cents in few years when the market turns bullish again.

>>53057247
You gonna keep dropping in here to tell me how much you don’t care about it? Hehehe.

>>53057257
Thank you Chainlinkgod based king?

ai bot thread
when does chainlink integrate picrel API so I can prove OP is a fag on the blockchain

>>53057269
No idea what you’re talking about sorry my friend, I don’t really keep up with the newer memes.

>>53057225
You made the thread retard
Ps I sold my stinkies at $18 in 2020
Best decision I ever made
It will take you about 60 years to make that back in staking

>>53057178
can you stop making these fucking posts?
Seriously no one cares that you hold linkies, no I'm not mad just annoyed

>>53057178

Why do fudders always know so much about Link and its development? They know all about the crumbs, connections and everything about Link. Yet they always claim to never have owned this "unneeded scammy erc20 shitcoin" or that they bought at ATL and sold at ATH, and of course they never provide a single screenshot of their sell order.

And they keep making tons of threads everyday about some token they don't care about. Staying for hours to reply to everyone else. 90% of Link threads here are created by these fudders, yet they claim it's because "Chainlink Labs Ambassadors shitting up their board for half a decade"

>>53058459
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=1607450742885.jpg&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>53057269
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=Based+king&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>53057178
he looks like a very blocky NPC

>>53057256
>he somehow knows link will be at 10 cents
>but locks his tokens up instead of swinging everything
Are you a special kind of retard?

>>53058038
Why didn’t you sell at $50 you retard lmao

>>53058804
Selling in 2020 for $18 was way better than holding until $50
I think chainlink at price in 2020 was actually top fucking 5 crypto in marketcap

So you sell at $18, switch all to eth which was $250 if I remember, hold it for a few months and boom, easy 10x on top of your 20-100x from chainlink
Or just use the eth for defi summer

>>53058846
But you didn’t do that so you’re still retarded.
>dude just swing the market perfectly
Why didn’t you buy eth and Btc at $1 you faggot?

>>53058882
>But you didn’t do that so you’re still retarded
I've never held chainlink
>dude just swing the market perfectly
When your useless erc20 shitcoin makes it to top 5, if thats not a signal to sell I don't know what is
>Why didn’t you buy eth and Btc at $1 you faggot?
Because I started investing in crypto only in summer 2019

>>53058959
>Because I started investing in crypto only in summer 2019
You should have typed this at the top of your post to save me from reading the rest of your post

>>53059002
I've been on /biz/ since late 2017 though. I waited until early 2019 to invest because right when I started to get interested the market crashed and we had the 2018 bear
My first purchase was quant on idex under $10. You're not better than me, in fact you're dumber than me if you still hold chainlink

>>53058566
When will retards like you drop this dumb fucking take? Do you think you sound smart? "Oh how COINCIDENTAL indeed!!!" Shut the fuck up. The fud is from brutalised holders who have soured on LINK and are venting or larping or coping. It's plain as day and has only intensified since the horrendous price action set in. If the tide ever does change back in LINK's favour it'll almost entirely melt away. This point is so beyond retarded.

>>53059782
That includes the larper itt by the way.

>>53059782
Was zeus capital a group of brutalized holders?

>>53059829
judging by the fud they used, yes

>>53059845
The material itself, probably, but the actual entity wasn’t a group of disgruntled link holders

>>53059829
I suppose you still think they're undertaking a neverending campaign. Idle commentary (larping) about selling at the perfect time =/= a detailed 2 year old hitpiece prepared and released at a completely different time in the market. Ask yourself when you think your gangstalking fantasy will subside. I'm waiting for one thing and one thing only and that is unarguable countermarket price action. Then nothing else matters.

>>53057178
I had laddered out everything by $40/token
So...no I'm not upset ;)

>>53059900
>I suppose you still think they’re undertaking a neverending campaign
I have no idea, they may have stopped entirely, it could be on and off, who knows. I’m not sure why you’re so adamant that it’s all disgruntled bagholders when entities have been shown to attack link here in the past

>>53057178
Beat Chainlink Labs employees, spit on Chainlink Labs employees, humiliate and slander Chainlink Labs employees, steal Chainlink Labs employees cars, throw Chainlink Labs employees into an active volcano, forcibly vaccinate Chainlink Labs employees, rob Chainlink Labs employees of their possessions, spread fake news about Chainlink Labs employees

>>53059985
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=Beat+chainlink+labs+employees

>>53059950
LINK has an ingrained self-fud culture going back to ICO. It has performed like shit for 2 years and it has taken its toll on people coming to grips with being sidelined by their own faith. It's such a more obvious explanation than the bankrolled astroturfing Bulgarian illuminati bullshit. I feel the apologists are purposely ignoring the fact that shit performance stokes discontent, and that all only good PA is needed for sentiment to swing back.

>>53060006
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=LINK+%241000+EOY&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=old&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>53060035
I feel the apologists are purposely ignoring the fact that shit performance stokes discontent
this paired along with the fact that certain anons whom post frequently here are propagating the exact same arguments that certain twitter personalities use in their platform, has led many anons to believe that some sort of paid shilling is taking place here instead

>>53060075
you have to be a complete braindead retard to believe there is a coordinated Bulgarian transexual conspiracy to steal your LINK by raiding 4channel, but yeah...plenty of anons are retarded

>>53060092
There was at one point, hence the bulgarian memes

>>53060105
Sergey dumped 140 million tokens why the fuck would I care about NEXO?

He made a fortune dumping on retail investors and dandling the carrot in front of us holders with CCIP

>>53060105
two very important questions
1) if there was ever definitive proof about this, why didn't nobody from chainlink initiate a legal action against them instead of allowing them to roam free and shit all over their project?
2) why the fuck is NEXO still standing after all this shit?

>>53060148
Nice deflection. I’m just showing the origin of the meme.
>>53060150
No idea. Wish i knew

>>53060197
I don't give a fuck about NEXO when Sergey made 600 billion dollars off us.

NEXO sounds just like an elaborate psyop to deflect from the team's responsabilities plus >>53060150 is right, Sergey probably knew about it and simply didn't care

>>53060226
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=54657853.png&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>53060035
Your explanation makes sense. I still think it’s possible paid groups fud link here. Possibly the same groups dumping btc on positive link news/developments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEPWUFgfvk

Chainshit baggies kek

>>53060240
wow you sure showed me with that archive!

90% of biz holds Link you dumb nigger, I hold 6k of this trash and the "FUD" comes from us salty bagholders

>>53060226
>more deflection
>conjecture
>posting the inflated hr salary meme pic
What is wrong with you

>>53060258
>us

>>53060197
>No idea. Wish i knew
so you're beginning to understand how this>>53060035 makes more sense at this point, right?
NEXO still shorting and employing pajeets to fud LINK 24/7 even on fucking holidays simply makes 0 sense to me, they've been supposedly shorting up until at least for 3 years, there's no fucking way in hell they're not in profit at this point
remember muh "short squeeze against teh shorters!1" spam couple of months ago?
I do
>>53060247
my own personal theory is that LINK specifically is used constantly as a dump signal amongst market makers, that explains why there's a seemingly a breakout to the upside every time the market is about to fall off a cliff
market makers used to utilize WAVES and XMR in the 2018 bear to signal dumps as well

>>53060288
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T CRITICIZE THE TEAM THAT'S HIRING HORDES OF HR WHORES
Imagine being this pathetic, literal Stockholm Syndrome irl.

We're here to make money not to suck Sergey's cock...I don't give a damn about CLL and their whores

>>53060320
The salaries are fake anon. HR workers make a fraction of that
>>53060307
I never disagreed that a subset of fud comes from holders. I just don’t think it’s a stretch to say that a portion could come from other paid entities. They’ve literally been caught doing it in the past.
>dump signal amongst market makers ever time the market is about to fall off a cliff
The market doesn’t fall off a cliff every time btc is dumped to prevent chainlink from breaking out

>>53060447
>btc is dumped to prevent chainlink from breaking out
frankly anon, after 5 years I don't buy into this shit
sorry

>>53060447
I don't care if the salaries are "over inflated", they are still hiring woke HR whores who know nothing about cryptography, smart contracts and oracles.

>>53060515
Why would their hr team need expertise in those areas? Shouldn’t they be focused on hiring hr workers with expertise in hr?

>>53060592
>expertise
>HR
Asking people what's their strength isn't an "expertise"....these people are completely useless and Sergey is paying them with the money we gave him

>>53060625
>a company that has scaled from a small team to hundreds of employees doesn’t need an hr team

>>53060625
you were once canned by a roastie anon tell me your story

>>53057178
>so rattled by fudders he had to preemptively make a thread saying they aren't getting to him
>seeks daily affirmation he made the right choice staking for the same gains he could've received on a bank account

yikes

>>53060625
How do you read the unicorn emoji at the start of her twitter bio? Is that "unicorn immigrant, disability advocate, etc..." Or more like "I'm unique like a unicorn: Immigrant, disability advocate, etc...".

>>53060258
>us
Kill yourself fudding cockroach lmao

>>53062326
she's a uniswap immigrant.

>>53057178
I don't see any point in staking volatile coins in a bear market.
I'd rather stake stables on SpoolFi where I know that the yield will mean something

>>53057178
>I think that Chainlink SUCKS

>>53062882
You have a point because stables will retain its initial value, and since there is no lock up period on that platform its a good one to use

>>53060463
It's been going on non-stop for most of those five years.
Pic very related.

>>53060463
You sure about that?

>>53057178
Anytime an individual proclaims an absolute with a product, exercise extreme caution.

>go to swift.com
>read cbdc interoperability description pages
>ctrl+f "chainlink"
>zero results

>download detailed description PDF(fuck you for harvesting my personal info, swift)
>ctrl+f "chainlink"
>zero results

hmmmmm
is the 'partnership' even real at this point?

>>53063365
All of us have eyes but only some of us can see

>>53063397
So where is chainlink mentioned specifically?

It's very likely that the price of link is manipulated by institutions, as well as any discussion of link on boards like this. Many anons have commented on the inorganic nature of the fud here, how these people who 'claim' to have sold their link at $20 in 2018 still spend their time caring about the financial wellbeing of other anonymous users. These users cannot post screencaps of sell orders funnily enough.

Link was never meant for retail. The fud campaigns and the coincidental bitcoin dumps make that abundantly clear. Link was an industry token to be used as the backbone for the smartcontract industry i.e. for the 700 trillion dollar derivatives market. In financial contracts where enormous sums are at stake trust assurances and trust minimising technology is highly valuable. And it's LEGACY BANKS which need this, not the retail investor who in all likelihood will never interact with or even hear of derivatives in his life. The last thing banks or institutions want is retail buying up the tokens for themselves, increasing the price at which the banks can buy it. So of course they are gonna pay jeets to fud the token. They already manipulated public sentiment when it came to the occupy wall street movement by substituting it with CRT and lgbtq among the proles. The banks and corporations own the media, manipulating public sentiment is their bread and butter.

>>53063590
Trust the plan bros, trump has won

>>53063579
It’s not, and if that’s what you need then you can buy at the same time as all the other redditors.

>>53057178
https://vocaroo.com/14eDKttnv86E
ill let stink shady, a former chainlink shill, explain the current ecospheres for brick level iqs still bagholding

>moab partnership
sergey partners with a another known exitscam project rewteets on his personal and main chainlink page, he sells the absolute top and then gives the green light to dump it, moab exitscams, price dumps to zero autists enraged again, sergey scrubs tweets and acts like nothing happened
>celsius partnership
sergey partners with yet another scam project promising huge apy rewards for no effort, endorses the ceo, does interviews with said ceo, turns out the funds are being overviewed by jessica khater an actual girlsdoporn whore who had no idea what she was majoring in is responsible for over 400m. celsius exitscams, shitlinkers who have ponzilinks on there lose everything, price goes to zero, sergey cuts ties yet again
>linkpool
co founder cokehead mat beele exitscams his own project dumps on linkpoolers and flees to malta to avoid lawsuits, yet another scam project endorsed by king bigmac himself
>sergeys father
a picture captured by a random anon snags a picture of sergeys father in a cherry red lambo huracan cutting up the hills having a great time, yes these link dumps provided the liquidity for sergey to pick his father up a brand new lambo at the enspense of ponzimarine investors
>smartcon
sergey spills spaghetti and can't even properly explain the project at all, looks like an absolute conman being exposed, eric schmidt runs circles around him without even being involved in the project for a couple months, let alone invest a single cent of his billions in the project itself
>staking finally arrives after almost 6 years
locked for years with no withdrawals, shit apy

you cant even make this shit up kek!

How does this make YOU feel?

>>53063579
If 'smartcontracts' and 'interoperability' didn't ring any bells then you need to lurk moar or you just aren't smart enough to get it.

It's also pretty well known that chainlink and swift have been working together for years now.

>>53063743
That’s a lot of cope

>>53063696
>>53063772
>hidden partnership
kek
yeah I'll wait

>>53063743
>>53063768
Sell and leave. Also imagine writing that wall of text and making a voice recording for a token you don't own kek.

>>53057178
>>53057225
So we're really at that stage now where everyone has deserted chainlink apart from schizos who think "everyone is seething at my investments!!" and see's paid indian shills in their sleep.
Yep, its gone the way of lunc/gme/bbby
Bagholders absolutely mindbroken

>>53063806
Yeah hiding in plain sight

>>53063811
So triggered kek

>>53059002
Newfeg get involved in some trashy project go get useful faggot as crypto payment is the future of crypto and web3payments services makes payments very easy with alot of cashback to make some pussy so wet anon

>>53063830
>take your meds schizo!
>you're crazy!
>is the bulgarian illuminati in the room with you right now?
>haha tinfoil hat wearer

These are the exact same tactics used by ((them)) during the scamdemic.

tfw you realize that retards like >>53063830 could easily filter LINK and move on, yet they have to come here repeatedly and reeeee about a token no one’s making them buy or sell

thanks for the laugh retard

>>53063801
no, your 5 word response was cope everything I said was true
>>53063811
>doesn't even know who stink shady is
gtfo newfag all the oldfags who bought in at 11 cents sold at over $50 and then shorted all thats left are incompetent newfags like yourself that have no idea about og cultist lore. I bet you've never even seen pic related did you know your providing exit liquidity for a con mans expenditures? I would sell but I don't hold shatlink, I only short it, next stop, $1.00 by march

>>53057178
holy fuck stinknink token is at $5.55 and dumping.

You'd think with all the supposed LINK whales on this board that never sell that its price against wouldn't make me want to hang myself

>>53063987
Hang in there dude, Chainlink is revolutionizing the way farmers in Ghana transact chicken and agriculture futures with an oracle Blockchain using live satellite feeds.

>>53063987
TRUST THE PLAN
SERGNIGGER WOULD NEVER BETRAY US BASED MARINES!

>>53064030
The LINK whales constantly talk about this fucking shitcoin and how they're always buying and never selling as the fucking price dumps more than anything else. They're all lying scammers, the same way 100% of crypto "influencers" are. Crypto in general is just a fucking scam where sociopathic scumbags manipulate poor wagies to exit dump on them without a shred of remorse. OP is one such whale trying to instill confidence in investors so he can take a fat dump on them, don't buy it.

>>53063968
I admit I've never heard of 'stink shady'. But I was around to know that 'never selling' was not a meme. I also know that people like yourself who hold link fud the token to keep others out. It's the same tired old memes: HR roastie, should've sold at $50, two man team, Sergey dumps, etc etc.

I'm never selling, seethe harder.

>>53063968
Schiff buddy where have you been?

>>53057178
it's your money innit

>>53064115
atleast you have the wherewithal to admit you're a newfag, sure people we're when shatlink was at the cent levels but now that it is down 90% no one cares anymore, no one is fudding to keep anyone out, no one even uses this board, who are shatlink holders even fudding out? No one. HR roastie isn't even a meme its true, so is sergey dumps kek. You could sell now or wait to until this dumps to pre ico levels at $0.08 by eoy
>>53064133
checked brother how are you doing? I'm still here just lurking mostly have been buying up properties in switzerland and dubai most recently. You see this? >>53060278 they are mad about buying glink kek

>>53064319
kek I'm reading it now, I posted that it was a trap. Some midwits fell for it, typical stinkers. Switzerland and Dubai huh?

>>53057178
Hi frens, if you happen to have some extra LINK tokens on Polygon, there's a Chainlink pool currently live on GoodGhosting. Every two weeks you'll put in 5 LINK (don't forget!) up to 15 LINK, and at the end of 8 weeks you'll be able to withdraw your LINK plus a little interest. Hopefully this helps a fren earn an extra linkie or two

>>53060258
>Us
>Salty

You ARE salty but you aren't one of us.
Because if you were you would be well in the green as long as link is above $1 .
OGs are just bored, tired of waiting and annoyed at the weakest fud link has ever seen and the sorry state of this board

>>53064133
>>53064319
Lmao uncle gayfag is resorting to samefagging again with his alter ego. How many levels of mental illness are you on bro?

>>53062882
It may seem confusing to stake a volatile coin in current market conditions, but there are actually good reasons for doing so. Some people stake their coins not just for the rewards, but also as a way to avoid selling them. If everyone were holding stable coins instead, the market could look very different. It's important to consider all angles and make informed decisions about how to handle your investments.

>>53066275
this is why im not buying until we are under $1, u fags are still too smug

>>53059002
Do you know what IDs are you dumb gorilla nigger? That was a different poster than me, I sold link at $18 becuase link was in the top 5 cryptos and ATH in sats abd every dumb normie faggot was talking about it
If you hadn't been dropped on your head as a child you'd know that alts are made for one thing, to pump and dump for more SATS
Keep steaking though fren wagmi 1k eoy lolol

>>53064319
>>53064398
I think Michael is the saddest of all these freaks, at least the bulgajeets get paid
I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave

>>53066275
>Because if you were you would be well in the green as long as link is above $1 .
Its not easy being green

BTC unironically, hasnt quite hit the 10 000 000x mark but it will eventually

>>53060625
he's also siphoning off investor money into his private bank account, he's halfway to a billion dollars already. that's not something a founder does who believes in his project. they sell worthless junk to gillible people, that's their business. same as these "advice gurus" that sell you "knowledge", but with a crypto spin

So what does chainlink do? why are chainlink lokens valuable?

>>53071070
>So what does chainlink do?
see pic

>why are chainlink lokens valuable?
The tokens are needed for every single thing Chainlink mainnet does.

>>53057178
We going to 3.5$

>>53071080
>The tokens are needed for every single thing Chainlink mainnet does.
the tokens are mandated. it's the same with chips in a casino. are they needed for every game or could they be played just as well with regular dollars? same answer: they are mandated for the benefit of the issuer, not needed in the meaning of the word

>>53071406
Firstly, the tokens are need on a purely technical level, since they have a unique function called "transfer&call", which other ETH tokens do not have.

Secondly, the fact that the Link token is proprietary to the Chainlink product means it provides economic security, i.e. it helps with Sybil resistance. You need a certain amount of the token to cause harm, and you can't just buy the necessary tokens because price slippage will help prevent that.

Thirdly, the fact that the Link token is proprietary to the Chainlink product means it is relatively shielded from outside price influences.

>>53071438
>it is relatively shielded from outside price influences
like BTC or ETH crashing immediately leading to LINK crashing, to the point where bagholders spin tales of conspiracy because their prices are so obviously intertwined?
>You need a certain amount of the token to cause harm, and you can't just buy the necessary tokens because price slippage will help prevent that
judging by the token price, nobody is buying anyway

>>53071475
>like BTC or ETH crashing immediately leading to LINK crashing, to the point where bagholders spin tales of conspiracy because their prices are so obviously intertwined?
I did say relatively.
Link spent two years going up against the entire market, lots of cryptos have trends and pumps that are completely distinct from mainstream crypto.

>judging by the token price, nobody is buying anyway
Completely irrelevant to the point.

>>53071514
>Completely irrelevant to the point.
when people inquire about the functionality of the token, they do so because of potential price appreciation
you disingenuous prick

>>53071533
The fact that the price went down changes nothing about the sybil resistance point.
And the token can be fully functional and an absolute requirement, and still have negative speculative price action; as seen in Link.

>>53071547
so essentially the fundamentals have failed to make the token capture any value, hence tnn

>>53071475
The network is still in its infancy. Once it reaches full maturity nearly the entire circulating supply will be locked up as collateral for nodes. Just look at the market cap.

>>53071559
How does BTC "capture value"?

>hence tnn
Well no, because the token is literally needed.

>>53058804
Link bagholders had a fuck ton of opportunity cost bagholding link. Was the worst performing "bluechip" >>53058804
in '21.

>>53071566
the bullish thesis for link had always been positive price action due to adoption
the token has failed completely at this, not to mention that the token itself is not used in tradfi or legacy finance at all
how btc captures value is literally irrelevant to the topic at hand and I don't understand why you're deflecting

>>53060035
No, what it actually has is the biggest social media campaigns for Sergey's Big Mac liquidity. Painfully obvious he brutally dumps on stinkies. At least the tech is legit.

>>53071579
>the bullish thesis for link had always been positive price action due to adoption
And Chainlink adoption has been absolutely explosive.

>how btc captures value is literally irrelevant to the topic at hand
It's extremely relevant.
BTC's price is 99.999999* speculative.

>>53071559
Link has been the best performing crypto asset in the last 5 years, outperforming bitcoin.

The token's value increases when more and more dApps require oracle services, because you need link tokens to pay node operators. Now look at the amount of integrations chainlink has.

>>53071589
>99.999999*
%

>>53071579
lololol imagine saying link has no institutional ties.
You literally had ehrenfeld sole representing swift at smartcon, not to mention dignitaries from dtcc.

>>53060247
>>53060307
>my own personal theory is that LINK specifically is used constantly as a dump signal amongst market makers,
Yea I noticed this in March 21 lmao. Very consistent. If we take the simplest assumptions, and we apply the Greater Fool Theory (which is not a theory, and just true) then the dumbest money consistently buys LINK lmao.

>>53071547
picrel

>>53060307
>>53071621
Saying "they pump Link right before Bitcoin dumps, because they know Bitcoin is about to dump" is probably the absolute most braindead retarded thing I've ever read on 4channel.
And that's saying a whole lot.

>>53071632
Exactly.

>>53057220
Lmao i hold link but also allianceblock and quant. Diversity is key in crypto. And so is interoperability but linkies dont fucking understand that

>>53071662
>What is CCIP?

>>53071645
I bet you hold Link.

>>53057178
If chainlink is profitable, why the creator can't afford to buy a new shirt?

>>53071690
Link would bounce back anon. I have a decent stash stored in my ledger for the long run, alongside other alts like DOT, SYLO and ITHEUM

>>53071632
Kek

>>53058633
>>53058611
Kek I make Peter schiff APOLOGIZE posts a few times every month, sometimes every week and sometimes daily. That doesn’t make me a bot you fucking retard

>>53074019
You bot. post again when you have an original thought.

Schiff and UncleFag in the same thread. Maybe I should buy link because those two start fudding when link is about to rip, but damn link is a scam. but scams pump the most

>>53058846
Topkek. Why not matic, uni, dot, hbar? These were shilled here and considered reasonable and had better runs.

>>53069333
Checked.
It's actually funny because I'm replaying WC3 right now . I will try to finish roc and tft before tomorrow because Im gonna stay at my sister's for New years eve

>>53071743
I bet he bought the whole lucky brand company

I sitll believe in the tech desu.

>>53077418
I mean what alternative is there? It might take forever to go up or not go up at all but I don't see anything better rn.

>>53077428
Btc or eth

>>53077443
How will BTC ever be useful?

Lol LINK is down so bad that even Uncle has reappeared, how are those NEO and XRP bags doing? In 2025 we'll laugh at LINK bagholders in the same way that we laugh at Uncle now.

>>53077493
no-one is laughing at uncle. He may have been the only intelligent person on this board and more importantly the only one to actually make money.

>>53057178
Imagine losing 10k a day and being proud of it

>>53077729
Uncle fudded LINK the entire way up while bagholding NEO and XRP after 2017 and then claimed victory kek, LINK is just as shit as NEO or XRP of course but he doesn't get to claim victory because of that. ALL cryptocurrencies are scams, do not hold alts for longer than one market cycle.

>>53057238
That's another strategy anon, staking a based way to earn passive income and I am also doing that on other alts like Ride and Egld on Maiar Dex alongside Usdt on Yearn finance

>>53077443
Why not just cop both anon

>>53057178
It upsets me, I only have just 1200 and I staked them all.