/biz/ - Business & Finance

confirmation that swift etc are using ccip in production
if that happens then everything in this scam market will be completely irrelevant and look like a joke
it's taken a lot longer than i thought and sergey has made some big missteps along the way but this is what we were imagining back in 2018
but to see them actually on the verge of pulling it off and considering all that could have gone wrong is pretty exciting
the 2018 and 2019 fud was that a quiet corporate backed competitor would come along and silently takeover given how "obvious" is was that they had their hands on
that was true fud
turns out they were the backed project all along
we will be very rich if they get the last part of it over the line
>What about a timeline? When do Swift and Chainlink anticipate this will all be rolled out at scale?
>It’s hard to say, said Nazarov. “It’ll be a gradual increase over time. As more and more banks begin to interface with the private chains of other banks and those private chains connect to public chains, you’ll see a gradual increase over time. Now we’re in the mid stages.”
https://cointelegraph.com/news/top-banks-work-to-make-blockchains-interoperable

>>54746585
Middleware? What's that? Which one are they using?

>>54561302
If you showed pic related to anyone alive in '18, they'd immediately sell their house and wife to buy Link.
The price doesn't make any sense, it's ok to acknowledge that.

>>54486272
>doing nothing to support token price
uhhhhhh

>>53714584
>hurrr Sergey is incompetent

>>53171248
>'speculation'
Swift and Chainlink have been working with each other for five years. Jonathon Ehrenfeld Sole has appeared at two smartcons not to mention people from DTCC and BNY Mellon. Sergey has been regularly appearing at SIBOS. If you can't put two and two together then you're either dumb or being purposefully ignorant (i.e. fudding). Nobody here who has done their due diligence is falling for this shit.

>>53063806
Yeah hiding in plain sight

>>53034615
>>53034173
You're both fucking brainlets and here's why: normies don't care about the underlying technology of link or why it's so important when it comes to enabling all these different smartcontract usecases. Literally all they see is 'number go up' and then they fomo in. If number doesn't go up then it may as well not exist in the normie's eyes. Normies don't live on the internet all day like biz neets nor do they have the time to research chainlink or smartcontracts or defi, so it's very unlikely they will even hear about link until it moons 1000x. Not to mention that normies only buy what everyone else around them is buying or what their retarded charismatic celebrity figures tell them to, and link is about as far from mainstream as you can get. So the price only being $6 is the PERFECT way to ensure they don't get in and find out about it.

Also: smart money has much longer time preferences considering most of them are already wealthy. They aren't regular anons like you and me worrying about their rent or credit card bills. They don't need it to moon in months. They're playing the long game to shake out those who are impatient/need liquidity.

>>52556888
>Chainlink sitting on their hands for 6 years doing nothing for you in terms of positive price action
haha what?
Chainlink has had the absolute most positive news out of any crypto these past few years.
And it's not even close.