/3/ - 3DCG

Yes you need to use substance designer or substance alchemist.
Or you have quixel.

I hope this is satire

>>778037
Just showing what Outerra is capable of

I tend to distrust any creator that is clearly monetizing (or hoping to) only through YouTube.

>>778011
My favorite part is how they call themselves "VFX Artists" while not working a day in the industry.
That fact alone makes their credibility effectively zero, and their opinion on anything worth even less.

>>778011
Meh, despite their shit being total cringefest. They still inspire people to learn vfx. I don't see any issues with this. However, I really hope they bring more actual industry people on their react series.

>>778013
This
And here's a great course about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JSFcSxsaTs

>>778006
>Why is rigging a nightmare?
because it is effectively programming and most artists brains are wired for creativity not for logic and math.
>How do I gitgud?
By properly learning everything you need to know about it and using the right tool for the job.
Maya is the best for rigging and animation - everything else pretty much sucks for various reasons.
>>778013
>Blender
>Rigify
Lmao indeed.

>>778006
I'm not sure if it's true but many people say blender's rig tools are horrible compared to maya's. Honestly, rigify does the most things fine, but when you have a complex character you may need to fix the weight maps.

>>778006
it's really not that hard, mostly just time consuming.

>>778072
It is true. I have attempted to build rigs in many mayor DCC's. Max, Maya, Blender, C4d and Maya is the queen and nobody comes close.
There is a lot of stuff missing in all other DCCs when compared to Maya, but the killer argument is performance.
A Rig that runs with 20fps in C4d, with 15fps in Blender runs with 120+ fps in Maya. Even with SubD applied it still runs faster than the other ones.
I personally can't animate a character if it doesn't run in realtime - and even if you use a proxy mesh for animation chances are high that Maya runs faster with the real mesh than your other DCC with proxy mesh.
Maya is the gold standard every other DCC gets compared to, and the only software that has a chance in the near future to step up is Houdini.

bump

>>778051
This is great. Looks totally real until you zoom in. I wonder how it could be improved. Perhaps peach hair? Maybe the lips could use a better transition of skin types. I dunno but it looks real.

>>778051
fuck. I couldn't tell it was cg until you mentioned. legit thought you were using a real picture to demonstrate a point to op or something

>>778052
eye bags give it away imo. maybe if they were a bit plumper, even if that doesn't exactly match with the actual actor's traits

bump

learn to bait better

>>777892
it appears that noone cares(Also rick and Morty are not valid 3d-form objects, they're just 2d. There isn;t enough perspective)

Any format as long as you can interpret it. Three.js supports .obj and glTF files out of the box I believe.
glTF is the preferred format for the Web since it's open, modern and also supports a lot of features.
Browsers have been able to display 3D stuff for a while now thanks to WebGL

See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebGL
https://www.khronos.org/gltf/
https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_loader_gltf_extensions

>>777991
So you are a fan of "realism"(not really since even that mecha would literally never be used in a war), but dont say as if "unrealistic designs" on mech is not common, there is nothing wrong with OPs MODEL

>>777995
>So you are a fan of "realism"
not really, i'm a fan of good design.

>>777991
>>777968

>and im here trying to...

act like you're intelligent and failing miserably

>>777997

>>777996
That is a opinion, i myself have room for both kinds of mecha, those "realistic mechas" are nice, but i usually prefer the cool over logic design.

>>777779
git gud at advertising or just gtfo

>>777779
Unless you're catering to degenerates with money....no. Digital "art" for money laundering seems to be on the rise so you might want to look into that.

Make coomer art and start a patreon.

reminder to report advertising like this

>>777890
I wonder, why would somebody advertise CG Crapper so hard?

>anon wants to make low effort high ad revenue bullshit for youtube

>>777756
sure

>>777811
YES what else can I do even lower effoet than this?

>>777811
Idk doesn't seem like its low effort.
Like the people who made it had to make the grass, leaves and everything.

>>777756
All these Indian animation sweatshops use pirated versions of Maya

I used v1 way back before getting into proper 3d. It was simple to use but very basic rendering wise (no cast shadows, fake videogame AO). Seems to have come a long way since.

I don't know very many, but I can start. The screenshot is from a video by Sage Suede:
https://youtu.be/tK6Zw56cz0Y

J Balvin definitely has a few on colors too. Who else?
https://youtu.be/IcBmnstOR64

>>777702
Been working on one for a musician for the past few months. Posted it a few times in the wip thread.
Doing the final 4k renders for it now, release date is November 4th.

It was originally just a lyric video, but its kind of taken on its own thing and turned into more of a dedicated music video. Though the lyrics are part of it.

Ooh, that sounds cool. I'm definitely curious to see it.

>>777696
If your condom looks like this sword's blade, you are doing something wrong.
But yea, I get what you are trying to say. Anyway, I just want to explore Blender right now and if necessary I pick tutorials for what I need. I don't want to create another donut right now. I want to go more like the "learning by doing" way.
Just looked up how to set up a better smoothing and found out about Auto Smooth by the way. It really looks better now.

>>777706
Of course. Skill comes with practice.

>>777732
Yea, I thought about that too, but I didn't want it to be crooked or something like that, like any disproportional features or anything like that. I wanted it to look like freshly "out of the forge". But noise texture is a very good idea to make it look more realistic. Thanks.

>>777663

realistically depending on what style you're going for like 3 out of 10 but very good for where you're at.

post topology/wireframe

It's getting better :)
But I am not happy with the handle yet. Especially the shape of the upper part, the part which is supposed to protect your hand, looks too clumsy

>>777951
delete this handle

It's not possible, and with a 770 there's really no point anyway.

The reasons for this are RIGHT in their post but you choose to meme up shit like middleschoolers.
So much for the industry professionals on /3/

>>777695
lmao you really suck multibillion dollar company's dicks?

>>777821
>>777880
blendlets starting to gather

>>777631
Over there it says Blender was just confered the right to take part in working groups ALBEIT WITHOUT VOTING RIGHTS
Why retarded zoomers can't even read?

>>777880
Nah, I just think it's funny that they could only spring for $3k, with all the grants and shit they're getting from Epic and shit, you'd think they'd be able to do the $18k and be able to actually do something with the membership.

Fuck, a middle income family probably has $3k on hand for vacation. But I'm not running a company so who knows. Still seems like there's all of 3 dudes working at Blender though.

Ultimately though, the membership doesn't seem like it's all that important. Sure it's neat, but Blender won't contribute much in the grand scheme of things. I hope it does, but it probably won't

>>777623
You can ghost the model directly, but this is rarely done. You usuaully either use motion path to track your controllers, or a transparent sheet over you screen to manually mark your spacing

>ghost
What? Do you mean onion skinning?

>>777985
>Why not just
Literally in the OP:
>I can open .obj easy in notepad and look up the numbers, but shit like .fbx is mostly encoded.

>>778059
https://www.autodesk.com/developer-network/platform-technologies/fbx-sdk-2020-0

>>778059
Sorry dude, I'm just simple maya user - my comprehension is limited!

I'm curious, what rabbit hole does one head down to discover one need to edit specifically fbx files in a text editor?

>>778068
blendlet detected

>>777699
Yes, he is. lmao

I don't think you want the OG model. It has a giant PeePee from what I heard.
The closest I could find is this one
https://gumroad.com/l/gross_steve

>>777664
that actually doesn't look as soulless as the one OP posted

>>777753
>Grotesque Steve HD
fucking hell lmfao

>>777753
i actually did find the original, and it does have the huge peepee. absolutely disgusting