/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15899819
I hope we get a 12m or 15m starship eventually

>>15899853
As soon as the present iteration of Starship is flying Starlink around the clock and well on its way to the moon, Musk will begin work on the next version. I don't think present version of Starship will go beyond LEO often

>>15899869
>>15899853
Longer is the current upgrade path, not wider.

>>15899880
longer is a mistake. it means you need thicker tank walls for the same volume of propellant due to bending moments. That's why Starship has always been fatter than the super streched modern falcon 9

someone make a new thread
this one is dogshit

>>15899857
How is chlorophyll akin to blood? I don't understand?

>>15899862
Literally the same structure which carries oxygen.

>>15899851
>They aren't proteins, so we can't explain it with genetics/evolution.
Strange reasoning. Have you heard before of the saying: form follows function?

>>15899862
It's plant blood. I don't know how it works for carnivorous plants. I'm gonna look that up, actually. It would make sense for them to have some kind of component for both.

>>15899851
>They aren't proteins, so we can't explain it with genetics/evolution.
what?

My neighbor was a Rockwell engineer who worked on the Shuttle orbiter.
He says Shuttle and Starship are both concepts that should never have been seriously incorporated as part of our *national level* space program.
They're both incredibly heavy
And there are some serious engineering issues that SpaceX must tackle - things that Shuttle engineers never figured out.
If only SLS was cheaper...

Cause you look like an idiot I'm going to punish you. It's not what you did to me. It's how you look

>>15899751
He must've launched several rockets by now then. Where's his company which addresses all those shortcomings? Or did he go to Bezos with his plan?

>>15899812
Awww

lots of new evidence after 2010
fat,fat,fat instead of meat,meat,meat
https://youtu.be/iSCV_XFcVPU?t=16m

>>15899785
>listening to women talk
*yaaaaaaaawwwwwn*

>>15899816
ok monkey

>>15899824
butthurt trannie

why should they need to? do all animals need to be scary?

>>15899701
Yes. Yes they do.
Intimidating appearance is a naturally selected thing for the sake of intimidating potential prey and predators.

Cassowaries are scary.
Hell, even emus, ostriches and large raptors are intimidating.
Nature has this habit of making apex predators look intimidating for a reason.

Also had hominids not developed complex social institutions like language, cultures and civilisation, we too would eventually look like monstrous things.
Though frankly we still could look monstrous if you think about genetic modification and cybernetics.

That's right. CQG (correct quantum gravity) will not be a time symmetric theory.

>>15899668
You're trusting that the description of solid weight content on the bag is accurate.

Weigh the bag. Empty bag, weigh chips. Find the volume of the bag without chips. Calculate the mass of air/nitrogen in that volume. Then sum the weights to see if it is air or nitrogen.

>>15899822
Now you're still assuming that the weighting scale is correct and that the reference for the mass/volume of nitrogen is correct. Your definition of true/false is limited to this network of references. I'm not OP by the way and he may have used this example as a metaphor to depict black box systems like humans.

>>15899848
You can make your own weighting apparatus. It's easy. But since these are reference based, you can start by using your fav rock, without any dependence to metric system.

>>15899863
In other words: consistency is key. Things must relate consistently in the same manner. That leads to the replication crisis: how many times have you measured the mass/volume of nittrogen to be sure what that is? Now we get a bellcurve distribution of m/v nitrogen.

what....?

Until the 99th time.

space force 616
nsa 617
space force 617
nsa 617
Nooooooolooooooool noooooo no lol
mil what to milly

'hangon aren't you just a single electron?
(single electron theory)

>>15899742
I'm going to hell you today and have you spawn with nothing back in this moment, to wait with me until you're sacrificed to the sun

>>15899612
C

this basically a modulo question
the smallest rest wins

A: This is the latest time in a day.
B: If it is in 11AM-12AM-1PM rule, this would be the latest time in a day.
C: If it is in 11AM-12AM-1PM rule, this would be the earliest time in a day.
D: This is the earliest time in a day.

>>15899612
Wait, they do? lol, Americans

>>15899612
The hour of 12pm is in the post meridiem, the hour of 12am is in the ante. 12 is really 0 on the clock, but we hadn't invented 0 yet.

>>15899607
Whaddya mean? We're only a decade away from immortality! Nevermind that we can barely treat autoimmune, let alone paralysis, and that simple infections kill millions. You might be the first person to live to 1,000!

>>15899607
> modern
LMAO

>>15899607
But we've literally extended their lives by many many decades compared to the past where they just fucking died after a couple months.
Sure, it's still not where we want it to be, but it's certainly better than what it used to be.

People like Stephen Hawking would've died half a century earlier at least.

AI will fix it. Digits confirm.

>>15899591
read the samarillion

>>15899902
Yup. You sure did win. Horses just arnt useful was a brilliant post. Lmao.

>>15899906
the irony here is the one guy to come to defense of niggers just said "well they were too dumb to realize horses would be useful" lmaoooo

>>15899911
>Yup. You sure did win. Horses just arnt useful was a brilliant post. Lmao.
Universally* useful. Desperate lying continues.

It would be sad if it weren't so funny

>>15899913
>the irony here is the one guy to come to defense of niggers just said "well they were too dumb to realize horses would be useful" lmaoooo
You mean pointed out you're too retarded to understand they're not universally useful? >>15899852
>>So my argument is more that you're too stupid to understand how it wasn't beneficial. The usual. /pol/tards gonna /pol/tard
The desperate lying when there's a fucking text log lmao

>>15899915
lmao. oh right. you pointed out to me i couldnt ride a horse to the moon. i can see why niggers didnt want to bother. i mean why innovate and improve your entire civilization if it doesnt directly lead to space travel. just lay around in your own shit and wait til a white man does it. thats what i say

>>15899500
where can i buy this

>>15899500
You need to supply the actual burning the material (The rope)

“Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need, and the things you own, end up owning you. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaries, and movie gods, and rock stars, but we won't. We're slowly learning that fact.”

Learn Emacs and Elisp.

>>15899497
install [math] \mathrm \TeX[/math]live

>>15899497
Because despite many claims to the contrary, LaTeX and its ecosystem are a complete disaster. Overleaf is one of the ways to make it slightly bearable.

If only the jannies would ban them. Did they eventually ban the angular momentum schizo or did he kill himself while trying to prove the violation of angular momentum?

the true advantage a schizo possesses over others is an innate fluency with the nature of paradoxes
inevitably, when you reduce a truly hard problem down to its smallest kernel of dysfunction, you end up with a paradox
a paradox is in effect the de facto fundamental particle of the science of hard problems
therefor the intuitive understanding that schizos possess allows them to comfortably exist in a world where no true resolution of absolute objective fact is ever possible
they swim in contradictions like a fish swims in water

if you're a non-schizo join my server https://discord.gg/FYpW6hFR

>picrel
>OP

Not every weirdo on /sci/ obsessed with a topic is a schizo. Many are just regular retards.

>>15899485
What if I don't want to use magnetic extraction? I'm looking for a physical method that will be able to extract the metal from the organic compound.

>>15899490
Incineration.
The water will boil, the organic components will burn away leaving behind iron oxide.

>>15899518
This is what I was considering. My only problem then is seperating the iron from the remaining carbon. Afaik the carbon won't burn away but I could be mistaken. Would a weight separation work? What sort of weight separation.

>>15899538
At that stage, magnetic separation is probably the way to go.

>>15899538
Blow in some oxygen. This is basic metallurgy.