/sci/ - Science & Math

I suppose he means “waves” are more “real” than “particles”. Even if you look at particles, they’re not clearly defined “billiard balls” but rather they too are kind of smeared out. So the word “particle” itself confuses the reaity of the thing. Everything is waves.
>inb4 waves of what/fields of what
I’m pretty sure we’ll never know the answer to that, anymore than we will know why the big bang happened in the first place. All we have access to is everything that happened after. And everything that happened after can be best understood in terms of waves.

>>11210444
he ment life is shakey shakey shake shake. how hard is this to understand? you stoopid?

If I vibrate my penor long enough it will expel a white juice.

>>11210444
he ment everything on a material level vibrates unless it's at absolute zero which it can't be unless done in a lab. or that's what he should of meant anyway. lol.

>>11210449
>I’m pretty sure we’ll never know the answer to that, anymore than we will know why the big bang happened in the first place. All we have access to is everything that happened after. And everything that happened after can be best understood in terms of waves.
Exactly. Empiricism will die off soon.

>>11210446
doesn't this happen naturally every 7 years anyway?

>>11210435
that is a great question and im not sure how to answer that... if it did perfectly emulate a human then I would have to say it should be given human rites.

>>11210477
>human rites
As a slave

>>11210491
you don't make inorganic people to make them slaves.

>>11210495
Because the Chinese are cheaper?

>>11210418
Just tell her that her generation destroyed the economy and that is why jobs don't pay enough to live and everything is unaffordable.

>>11210418
>What the fuck is wrong with me?
You're an autistic retard who also can't tell the difference between /sci/ and /adv/.

Just go to therapy man

>>11210440
i just want to be programmer so i stay all day on computer solving leetcode-type puzzles till i bruteforce my way into junior position. She seems unable to understand that, she says i am sick because i have no friends, i dont go out of house, i am so fixed on this shit.
When it comes to theraphy - well maybe i would try if its some group one, but then i would be forced to attend this group theraphy every week and pay for that. After year they would say "year is too short! you need to attend theraphy longer", and then i am slave to theraphy. I would not be able to exit therapy, because it would again hurt my mother. I hate feeling like i am forced to do something, like i am enslaved by my mental illness. Even worse that mental state is such a invisible matter. I can go to therapy or take pills a year and still not feel like it helped me in any way, because its such a subtle matter, and you can never be objective in assessing your mental state.

i mean if you learn math or shit for a month then you can say "i can do this this and this. I have problem with this and i dont understand this concept. I need to work on that more!". With mental state its different, i dont feel happy or sad anymore i am just dead inside. I think thats why i am opposed to idea of wasting time and money on therapy. I dont give a fuck about how i feel, i just need a damn job

how does voltage and diameter of coil affect the magnetic field?*

>CS
>>>/g/

>>11210367
ThOsE wHo CaNnOt ThInK fOr ThEmSeLvEs WiLl InEvItAbLy Be ThOuGhT fOr By OtHeRs

Pray for a decent psychopath.
;-;

>>11210372
Interesting, let's say for the sake of the argument that UN decides to make critical thinking a must to have in basic education. They probably reach to a similar conclusion than me at some point in their lives, because it's not about apathy in the sense of "I guess if they aren't doing nothing to me I can safely not care", but rather in the fact that we're currently in a time where technology (such as nuclear power, internet, ai, etc.) can really pose a threat to ourselves by falling in the wrong hands. And while we could setup legal frameworks to avoid certain things, in the end, with enough work they can always be circumvented.

I ask this question because it deeply troubles me that it seems highly rational and pragmatic to just, vanish them from future generations.

>twitter drama
Absolute garbage. Go back, OP.

>>11210228
>look mom, I learned how to use the zoom function on my phone and it only took me one year!

>>11210228
Can I make my dick longer with it?

wtf is this fremen bullshit?

You know this is a meme right

>>11210416
sorry don't have the source. I just remember reading the article months ago.

>>11210420
it was in America and yes it worked.

>>11210423
the chemo is used to shut down the immune system so that you can reprogram it before your reprogram your dna. if you just reprogram your dna first your immune system will attack the new dna and slowly kill you. this is a far far worse scenario.

>>11210222
I want this shit to fix my psoriasis. I also want it to significantly extend my life span.

>>11210428
I see. there's no way around that besides chemo?

>>11210450
not that I know of no. tho if you were to study the your immune system you may be able to come up with a drug that could effect it but that's just a guess at best. chemo is a shit method I agree and need to be replaced with something that is less toxic. it also costs a lot.

>>11210214
50 years.

Robotic ones will probably come sooner.
And then bio-mechanical hybrids that blur the line between life and machine.

http://www2.technologyreview.com/news/412185/tr10-biological-machines/

>>11210251
Why is it unitless? Because it's based on a constant and describes the number of atoms?

>>11210261
i guess the word i'm looking for is "dimensionless". it just means "an avogadro's number of". it has no dimension, it's just a number. kilograms have the dimension of mass, seconds the dimension of time, meters the dimension of length. mol is dimensionless, it is just a number of something. you could for example have an avogadro's number of meters which would be equivalent to a mol of meters. or a mol of picoseconds would be 19,000 years. real units don't work like that. you can't have a kilogram of seconds

>>11210273
>>11210251
Yeah it's kind of an un-unit, but it is far more useful than most other units, at least for chemistry. I mean, the other units?
[math]\hbar=m_e=e=4\pi\varepsilon_0=1[/math], done.
However, the macroscopic dynamics of a process do not depend on the mass of the substance but on the amount.

>>11210205
SI is for industrial practicality primarily, and used in science incidentally. That's why you have pants-on-head retarded units like candela as a base unit, which is based on human psychosensory perception.

>>11210227 gives a good perspective on historical roots.

>>11210261
it's like making "dozen" a fundamental unit. We already have a unit for counting; it's called 1. btw, the new definition of mol breaks the traditional interpretation of the number of atoms in 1g of C12, as in this is no longer true with the new units

IMHO, base units should describe length, mass, time, and charge (in all its varieties like electric and color charge. mass is a type of gravitational charge, but since it is also inertial mass, it probably should be given it's own unit). Candela, mol, and kelvin are fucking imbecilic units.

>>11210339
>kelvin
>imbeciliic unit
bullshit. Of course the unit's scale is arbitrary as it is cancelled out by [math]k_b[/math], but similar things are true for other units as well. For example, energy and time can be chosen unitless, because they form fourier pairs. Does that mean they should be unitless? Similarly, it makes no sense for length and time to have different units, because they are converted into one another freely using lorenz boosts.

>>11210156
from the little i've seen online, it seems like it's either difficult or impossible to find an exact value for a general case, so instead of trying to find an integral, it would be better to use some constructive solid geometry library to find the solid of intersection, and find the volume like that.

>>11210177
Well Is there a general case solution for one torus and one cone?

who? I hope so, this gives me self confidence if so; maybe I do have the phenotype all along.