>>15754166
>A layering of shirts is not totally ridiculous in that way, and it has the same context as grunge fashion that is popular now.
but the issue is: long sleeve under short sleeve is part of 2000s fashion, and many lower class and out of fashion people still dress like this (see Karen for example, they still sport what is basically a 2000s haircut). this creates negative context. same happened with mullet, we had a huge 80s resurgence but no one wore it because of the rednecks. typically, people who are out of fashion will dress like past decades, even if they are unaware of it. and you risk looking like one, with a questionable trend too. you risk looking like a blink-182 fan who lived under the rock or clueless boomer who still listens to his now uncool bands.
remember that for its good qualities, grunge still went away and never came back until nostalgia came.
also, one more example: fringe. technically its not bad, but emo killed it. it left such a huge negative context that we'll probably have to wait a long time before people forget emo.