/lit/ - Literature

The one I'm currently writing. It's also counter-Evolian in a way, but not in a hostile sense. I respect Evola.

>>13002875
nearly, surely did explain it to the plebs and engage in his own work for as much truth as possible. I just know through reading all his works their was much more he discovered on his lonesome that he aspires others to seek just as he himself did

he went back to the beginning, which boils down to the same thing

>>13002745
>what gave it away
the fact that you dont exist for a start

looks like a fat shitlib Evola

*Diddles kids*

>>13002728
what's the deal with Wolffs that makes them so salty about capital?

>>13002765
fair enough

>>13002744
How so? According to SEP he works in a post-Kantian framework in D&R. Now I haven't read D&R, but in C&S he seems to have reverted to some kind of Spinozan panpsychic materialism and I can't figure out how that's compatible with Kant's central problematic.

>>13002809
Read his lecture series on Kant, available online. His entire system derives from transcendental empiricism, his inversion of Kant's schematic

Deleuze's virtual is a transcendental category empty of forms but still containing difference (probably partially derived from Leibniz, probably even Trinitarian theology in how an unindividuated virtual can still be characterised by multiplicity, and if Deleuze is to have his way Bergson), a elegant 'organic' solution to not falling into the trap he sees with Kant for one. Key to this solution is that individuation is a process which occurs after something has emerged into our everyday empirical realm, probably cribbed from Simondon and a redirect from the waning fashionability of Existentialism's essence-existence etc.

Deleuze is one of the top "I've already considered that and here's my workaround" philosophers of all time. A huge part of his philosophy just comes about trying to avoid falling into so many pitfalls which others before him have. I think that more than anything is why his language is so ephemeral, he doesn't want to say too much but has to account for a lot.

You know he wrote an entire book on Kant, right?

I hate this fucking board.

Now this is a a level of based previously unknown to mankind. I think this can be known as based and londfrogpilled!

>>13002678
Not enough about Stacies and trust fund Chads for me to give you a based and redpilled on this one.

>>13002637
A Midsummer Night's Dream
The Communist Manifesto
Mcdonaldization

>>13002637
read Saki and turgenev's sketches from a hunter's album

>>13002616

>>13002616
Finnegan's Wake

phenomenology of spirit

>>13002616
Joke's on you, I just finished this the other day and it was pretty good

>>13002565

He parses myriad ethical quandaries.

I hope this book convinces you to kill yourself.

1. Clean your room
2. Wash your penis
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11.
12.

>>13002846
It's doing the opposite. It's turning my life around.

doesn't make sense retard

id like to weigh the ontological being of those tiddies against the dialectic of my hands if you nawmsayin

breastfeed me mama

>How does one weigh the ontological commodification
By abusing jargon. Now show milkers.

Thanks op, I planned to skip gym today but I'll go for this milk truck

>>13002545
In other words epic poems are big hard, prose much easy for to read

>>13002718
to be fair the iliad & odyssey aren't supposed to be difficult

>>13002690

I’m not an English speaker. I read the translation of Federico Lourenço published by Editora Cotovia (I liked Homer better than Dante)

>>13002545
*to everyone with a brain

>>13002734
mfw

>>13002492
never gets old
this ones pretty feels:
>this must be how the-the um-um failure starts, an incompetence in mastering the common tasks of everyday life

>>13002492
i like that film. the main character's a pretty boring self-insert i think but nick is a great character & it has a nice novelistic story

Bleak house

Just read Pickwick Papers, which is just about perfect. Dickens perfected his thing with his first novel, and never quite managed to better it.

>No pickwick

Cmon lad

go away

>>13002393
logged in just to downvote this, yikes sweaty

>>13002398
it's actually a lulzworthy idea, but phrases op listed are usually used in comments, not the post itself.
thus, it's only correct to write a book REVIEW using them.
should make a new thread

Listen! I recently found this gem of an an awefuckingsome band called Hello Kitty Suicide Club that y'all folks need to just shut up and listen to. Yes... I'm okay... yes *yes* and *no*. Many tears were shead on the night I realized they were utterly super duper after years of not being able to endure more than a few minutes, thinking "this is just me". Could the same thing have happened to you, good sir? Ditto that? Let that sink in. Your flawed human brain automagically nailed it to the metaphorical wall of "this is why we can't have nice things" level dipshittery. You ought to tell your brain -
brain, you had one job!" Kudos to you for going back and listening to HJSK. After, you will be able to respect yourself, and, why yes, maybe even like yourself. Yay for you. Nope, wait, is it actually shit? Literally no. Duh. Just thought I'd throw a little curveball in there to leave your mind=blown. What? You're mad at me disrespecting Hello Kitty Suicide Club? That escalated quickly, you magnificent bastard. Looks like I nailed it. Faith in humanity restored? Uhm... no sweetie... There is not one mississippi, two mississippi, or even five. The time I have left to write this is in the red, and to go on any other website now, well that's a risky click. Let that sink in. I'm definitely doing this to fuck around, but I have to go to work. Kudos to you for taking the time to listen to me whine, my good sir. It's caled being a decent human being, and I hope you have a super duper day.

no

Interesting