[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vr/ - Retro Games


View post   

File: 17 KB, 267x373, Etvideogamecover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8882998 No.8882998 [Reply] [Original]

It's not even that bad.

>> No.8883004

No u

>> No.8883013

It's really just that floating back out of pits gets old
Just need to change that part

>> No.8883016
File: 42 KB, 589x450, 00Y0Y_55XgyTDPhVx_0BX0t2_600x450.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8883016

>>8882998
its not that it was "bad"
it just was absolutely not what people were expecting or wanted


a simple barnstorming copycat title with a flying bike and basket would have been more than enough - atari got fucked over by corporate bigwigs during its entire lifespan

>> No.8883017

>>8882998
its isnt, its just bad for an atari game.

>> No.8883027

>>8882998
>hi dev, you have 3 weeks to write a game based on a massive license, get the fuck to it!
how times have changed

>> No.8883145

The whole "WORST VIDYA EVAR" reputation is pretty ridiculous, but then some people with contrarianitis will say that it's secretly a really good game. The reality is that if it wasn't for bugs, it would be a 5 out of 10 game, not excellent, but nothing to get up in arms over.

>> No.8883190

>>8883145

I wouldn't say "really good" except by the low standards set by other Atari 2600 games, but it's not a secret and doesn't rely on contrarianism. It's just a solid, interesting game (by console standards). The only bug that matters much to most players is the one that makes you fall into pits at certain times when you wouldn't intuitively expect to, and that is easily worked around by anybody not too retarded to learn the simple rules the bug follows.

>> No.8884862

>>8882998
Yeah, it's your regular atari 2600 game. Why it made people go apeshit? I can name 50 worse Atari 2600 games on the go.

>> No.8884870

>>8883013
This. There's a patched rom that fixes most of the gameplay flaws, and then it's kinda decent.

>> No.8884886
File: 243 KB, 800x1092, golf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8884886

>>8882998
I think Golf is worse. But I do love Miniature Golf on the VCS.

>> No.8884916

he's gonna take you back to the past...

>> No.8884926

Considering that there's a not insignificant number of games on the Atari 2600 where you can't even be sure if you're even playing the game or not, E.T. easily ranks above average for the console's library.

>> No.8884928

>>8883145
it's part of the gen-x myth

>> No.8884938

>>8882998
Who could tell in the atari days? Atari had some bangers but even when I was a young ass kid most of the games were boring or you couldn't tell wtf you were supposed to be doing.

>> No.8885241 [DELETED] 

>>8882998
Fucking kek! Insane crashcope. Still. Just how deep are those scars?

>> No.8885248 [DELETED] 

>>8885241
In english, doc

>> No.8885273 [DELETED] 
File: 42 KB, 626x417, You. Coping. Forever..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8885273

>>8885248
>crashcope
>b-but I don't understand..?
Yes. Yes, you do.

>> No.8885571 [DELETED] 

>>8885273
There’s only a handful of posters on this board that were old enough to experience Atari in its prime.

>> No.8885661 [DELETED] 
File: 32 KB, 500x500, 5681bd111d7e7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8885661

>>8885273
>2022
>Average /vr/ user being pic related
>Anon thinks we are still pre-date shift
There is a good chance the other guy genuinely has no idea about the crash, you dunce

>> No.8885668

>>8883027
Movie-based games are not possible now unless it's a game developed from an older movie from years ago.

>> No.8886650 [DELETED] 

>>8885661
>everyone I don't like is a zoomer or millennial
Such irony, as that's precisely the kind of thing a zoomer would vomit.
Cry more, arrested development faggot.

>> No.8886816

>>8885668
Why?

>> No.8886896 [DELETED] 
File: 90 KB, 500x501, 317.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8886896

>>8886650
You overdid it

>> No.8887045

E.T. was the first open world video game.

>> No.8887110

>>8887045
Link the youtube video that lied to you.

>> No.8887226
File: 8 KB, 266x190, download.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8887226

>when there's a perfectly decent ET game on Atari computers but nobody ever mentions it

>> No.8887261

>>8887045
>E.T. was the first rogue-like.
ftfy

>> No.8887271

>>8887261
Part of me wants to laugh, part of me wants to reach through the internet and throttle you. Is that what you were going for?

>> No.8887478

I enjoyed it. But being 10 at the time and subject to whatever mom bought you so you made the best of it probably played a factor. I do recall lying in the backseat of the car on the way home from Sears trying to make sense of the manual.

If I "discovered" it today where I have the money to (and do) own *all the games* I don't know if I'd have as much patience for it when i can just move on to another game the moment I meet up with some annoyance.

>> No.8887537

>>8882998
But YouTube pretend nerd man tell me alien game bad.

>> No.8887558

>>8887537
Well it was bad, but it wasn't especially bad. It was, however, a colossal flop on a scale never seen before.

>> No.8887573

>>8887045
Yes.

>>8887261
No.

>> No.8887581

>>8884916
I want to go back...

>> No.8887709

I always disliked the film, it's one of Spielberg's worst if you ask me. The visual design for E.T. makes him repellent, his head looks like a scrotum with eyes, and his neck looks like the dick. The child protagnist is no better, he's fucking annoying. No wonder the game is shit when this is the source material.

>> No.8887752

>>8887709
>noooo aliens have to be hot girls!

>> No.8887759
File: 240 KB, 680x709, 1650205556827.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8887759

>>8887752

>> No.8887789

>>8886816
Because the lead time on an A game is longer than a lot of films are in production, and studios wouldn't accept a licensed indie title (unless it was clearly a sideshow like an old tie in flash game or something).

Can you imagine Avengers The Game Of The Film being a VN made with semiofficial art by two students in a month?

>> No.8887870

>>8887709
>No wonder the game is shit when this is the source material.
they could have just made some simple "fly around on a bike with ET in the basket and dodge obstacles" bullshit but Howard Scott Warshaw thought he was some kind of renaissance artist

>> No.8887875

>>8883145
This. Platformers with bad movement are easily worse.

>> No.8887883

>>8882998
I think you had to have a guide telling you wtf to do and any Atari game that wasn't straightforward and playable would be a huge disappointment.

>> No.8887969

>>8887883
There's plenty of atari games that don't make sense at first but do when you read the instructions. Mountain King is a great example.

>> No.8888684

>>8882998
>>8883145
It's not the worst game. But it's the biggest flop. They expected a huge success, printed a lot of copies, and then didn't know what to do with them.

>> No.8888934

>>8887969
Mountain King is so damn good. Ported to most everything, too.

>> No.8889073

People say they had high expectations for this game. What did people expect out of an Atari game honestly?

It's still funny to think that Atari produced more copies of this game than there were 2600 systems though. No idea what they were thinking there.
inb4
>Atari
>Thinking

>> No.8889130

>>8889073
>What did people expect out of an Atari game honestly?
Something fun, not dull and frustrating? People are talking shit about the really horrifically bad games for the 2600, but those are third-party carts from no-name publishers basically ripping people off.
In-house Atari games had a higher standard, and E.T. is down among the worst games that Atari released, alongside the gimmick-based Sword Quest. Pac-Man was a terrible conversion, but it was at least fun to play.

>> No.8889142 [DELETED] 

>>8885273
nice selfie but you should probably work out if you want to lose those tits

>> No.8889201

>>8886816
Too expensive and too much time investment.

>> No.8889209

>>8882998
I genuinely believe the game only failed because ET was green
I mean what the fuck were they thinking? There was a perfect brown color in the Atari's palette that they could've used, and visibility probably isn't the reason because half the screens are green

>> No.8889664 [DELETED] 

>>8886896
Truth hurts, hm? Keep crying. Keep coping. It is the gaping wound that can never heal - such was your baffling incompetence. It is something the rest of us can hold over your head until the end of time. Best thing about it? You have no reply. Nor will you ever have one, because no one else is capable of such profound stupidity.
You may now seethe.
>>8889142
Imagine actually believing that this qualified as anything other than desperation. Pathetic. Another arrested development faggot with a laughably weightless retort.

>> No.8890802
File: 32 KB, 267x373, k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8890802

you should have seen the original design for the cover

>> No.8890813

It's an attempt to arcade-ify the genre of adventure games, the problem with this being that the moment to moment gameplay of adventure games isn't that fun.

That said, it got a worse reception than it deserved because kids couldn't read the manual

>> No.8890828

>>8890802
>ET: Extra Toked
>Time to really get lifted out of those pits

>> No.8890892

>>8890828
lol

>> No.8890972

>>8889073
>What did people expect out of an Atari game honestly?
People were literally deranged over E.T. when it came out. Think about the soíboí obsession with nuStar Wars but expand that to all of society and multiply it a few fold. Any merch that came out was immediately bought up by people who otherwise had no interest in whatever that merch was. So when they released a game, you had people who barely even knew what a video game was buying Ataris just so they could play the E.T. game. You ended up with a bunch of people who weren't used to how bad the average Atari title was having their first exposure to the console through a game that embodied some of the worst game designs of the era.

>> No.8890990
File: 73 KB, 630x611, 1630529672208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8890990

>meanwhile in the other timeline
>ET was just a low effort Pac-Man clone
>the market was satisfied
>Atari never collapsed, no opening was ever created for Nintendo or Sega or Sony or Microsoft to enter the console market
>everyone is happily playing their Atari 64000s right now

>> No.8891015

>>8890990
Could have happened if Nolan Bushnell had just not answered the phone when Warner Bros called that one time. Atari doesn't get bought out by captains of stupid, Nolan hires his own marketing guy, and is never replaced by dumb corporate suits who know nothing about video games. They were the source of almost every single stupid decision that wrecked Atari.
>>8890972
>a bunch of people who weren't used to how bad the average Atari title was
Atari games weren't bad.

>> No.8891016

>>8891015
>Atari games weren't bad.
Delusional retard

>> No.8891017

>>8891016
Look at first-party titles, there's stuff I'm not into, but they are virtually all at least decent 1st gen games. The bad shit was third-party jank sold at minor retailers by no-name companies.

>> No.8891023

>>8891017
literally nobody back then cared about 1st party, 3rd party, or any studios by name, they bought games because the cover art looked cool or it was a port of some arcade game they liked

>> No.8891028

>>8891023
Then why did the market not crash until Atari published a shitty title, huh? Nah, you're wrong on that. People (my dad and I included) trusted the Atari name to provide good quality games. We knew Activision and Imagic were solid as well, and any title from them was worth a look.

>> No.8891029

>>8891028
cool anecdote my dad said that your dad was a faggot

>> No.8891037

>>8883145
all atari 2600 games are shit

>> No.8891041

>>8891029
Does your dad also go around claiming that everyone born before him is some kind of idiot who couldn't possibly understand advanced concepts like "recognizable brand name product" versus "shoddy knockoff"?

>> No.8891057

>>8891028
>>8891041
As far as the vast majority of the market was concerned, if it was an Atari 2600 game then it was an Atari game.

>> No.8891064

>>8891057
kek it was worse than that most people thought games were like vhs tapes and didn't understand why their coleco couldn't play atari games

>> No.8891068
File: 147 KB, 500x290, 1645906457863.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8891068

>>8891064
>didn't understand why their coleco couldn't play atari games
*blocks your path*

>> No.8891260

>>8891064
just tell them Coleco plays Beta

>> No.8891265

Test

>> No.8891313

>>8891265
Failed.

>> No.8892226

>>8891057
>>8891064
Yes, the shitty knockoff vendors preyed upon unsuspecting grandmas who didn't know any better, but the people who owned the consoles weren't morons. This feels like some kind of modern campfire story version of shit I actually lived through.
I guess every generation gets people who think everyone from "prehistoric times" was somehow a moron and just "not smart like we are now." But no, people have been smart and dumb in about the same measure since we came down out of the trees. The crash didn't happen because everyone was too dumb to understand what brand names are, it happened because people stopped trusting the brand names.

>> No.8893969

na

>> No.8894175

>>8887709
I always thought the same.
ET was a massive success and The Thing was massively panned.
Funny how things turned out and nobody gives a fuck about ET anymore.