/biz/ - Business & Finance

Bitcoin will never go under 30k.
t. /biz/

>>52308521
god i'm going all in if we hit 10k

>>52308540
If you didn't learn not to listen to /biz, you don't belong to /biz kek

>>52308521
It's never gonna be like Do Kwon heist. CZ is in charge now.

>>52308551
Same thing you said before we hit 20k, be patient you will be buying the top just like you did the last time.

>>52308824
mmm no, 10-13k was my target since i sold around 60k last year

>>52308521
>We are below 20k again and it seems like we could be heading to 10k -14k judging by the rate FTT dumped. Do you guys think this could be like the LUNA crash or are we done with it?

There's the Solana crash coming soon, isn't there?

That should push everything lower.

>>52308786
Jokes on you anon, wait till CZ says he is no more acquiring FTX and watch the whole crypto market sink right before your eyes.

>>52308881
>i sold around 60k last year

Stop shitting around pajeet, you didn't sell at 60k

>>52308540
Is this an info from the inside.? Shitty larper gtf outta here. Where is BTC now?

>>52309145
The jew got bigger plans than your wisdom and got enough funds to throw into Twitter and FTx.

>>52309930
Rumor has it FTX has a loophole of about $3-6bn which makes me wonder why CZ would want to take such risk, asides from the fact that regulations would hit him hard after.

>>52308940
Google news helped Solana, I believe they won't suffer for now. But being as bad as they are, it's inevitable.

>>52310130
Rumor has it being keyword. Cz isn't a retard, he wont put himself in a mess without purpose

>>52308551
that's a man

>>52310938
But the agreement came after a huge liquidity crunch. FTX asked for help from Binance.

>>52311007
And what, anon. You think two exchange giants who were basically competitors would join forces without thinking of the consequences
Kek
There's definitely some hidden agenda there or CZ is trying to monopolize his position as an exchange giant. Either way, he wont jump onto a sinking boat blindly

>>52311041
What benefits, jeet. Tokens are all crashing because of the uncertainty of the deal

>>52308521
>losing hope for the first time since the beginning of this year.
The signs have always been there. You've probably just been living on hopium. Smart peeps have been fully into risk management strategies since the signs popped up.

>>52311067
You newfags act like this is unexpected. The crypto market is and always has been fucking volatile. As long as your assets are safe and your risk strategies are on point, why the fuck do you care
Buy the dip and STFU

>>52308551
Most definitely! it's definitely not gonna stay there for long if it gets there. Your stables better be ready to be deployed at the go signal. If you're staking currently, you're better off staking on platforms with no lock time.

>>52310130
Rumor also has it that FTX token will go to 0, lmao

>>52308521
>Do you guys think this could be like the LUNA crash or are we done with it
We're way over the LUNA crash effect. This is just market volatility playing out at its best.

>>52311124
This anon gets it. Safe assets with less risk. Stables are a safe bet

>>52311220
If it does, it does. No one should have had more FTT than they could afford to lose or so much that it risks their portfolio

>>52311262
be careful with what stables you suggest to newfags

>>52311259
Precisely. Good to see smart jeets out here. Biz is full of fags who have no idea what they're talking about. Volatility because of the uncertainty. Especially because there's still rumours about the purchase not actually happening, since the entire Terms of deal is a secret

>>52311311
I'm not a fucking financial advisor. They can do their own research. I only personally stake 1:1 backed stables.

>>52311363
kek 1 to 1 backed reminds me of the absolute shitshow that was Binance no longer supporting USDC

>>52308786
So we'll be having a CZ heist next?

>>52308881
>i sold around 60k last year
Even though I know you probably didn't sell at 60k, hope you've been wise enough to put the stables to good use. Probably staking?

>>52311393
Look, i see the pov in terms of BUSD, but i never staked USDC on Binance. APYs were shit anyways.

>>52311456
We're not going to see a heist, we're going to see a take over.

>>52311041
>CZ is trying to monopolize his position as an exchange giant.
CZ acts like the savior of the market now to put Binance as the top CEFI platform out there. That's gonna be too much power for 1 person and the more reason why I'll be avoiding it like wild fire. Sticking with Defi all day everyday to keep full control of my assets.

>>52308824
>be patient you will be buying the top
So what can someone do in the meantime? You know how it i when you have funds to deploy but can't do that for some obvious reasons.

>>52310340
Solana is so shitty. I wouldn't ever buy any projects launched on its chain. It's either Ethereum or Binance or Polygon or nothing. For those complaining about ETH gas fees, there are ways around it and smart devs have devised some means to reduce the gas fee burden on their users.

>>52310130
Rumor never fact. The short cut to being a whale is killing your competitor. Crypto whales are smarter than even physics elites.

This is a golden time for Binance US to prove their smartness

>>52311067
This is why you will forever remain poor. Very risky period differentiates you and Elon musk. Your blindness is the vision of the genius.

>>52311762
Too much power for one person sounds like something out of a dystopian movie, anon. Be realistic

>>52311262
Stables are owned by thesame people. The solution is to hide under your mom's basement.
Crash knows no bounds between stables and unstables .

>>52312408
Anon stables are less volatile than the rest of crypto because of their backings

And if you use middlewares like SpoolFi or bEarn Fi as compared to yield generators like Aave or Harvest, it's even less risky

>>52310938
You sound like a retard now, didn't CZ himself include in his announcement tweet that he can pull out anytime.

>>52312153
There's never a smoke without fire, for FTX to agree to the terms of acquisition from Binance, that should tell you all you need to know.

>>52312952
What are the terms though,
Aren't those still pretty fucking lowkey

Binance already backed out of FTX.
thanks for playing guys

>>52311762
He established that way back. Who's the giant in this industry? Binance today is valued >$117

But that doesn't change the fact that DAOs are the best.

>>52313482
they did not. there are rumors but thats it.

>>52312444
>it's even less risky
What about the APYs . We count zeros not risk retard especially if it's possible to access the generators from a single entry point....

>>52312596
You must be living in caves of the mesopotamian empire where news is in the hands of fakers ...

>>52313810
You do know that APYs that are too high on stables aren't sustainable right, desu

Around 10% on a lower risk spool for USDC , varies. But you should dyor honestly. Comparatively higher than Binance's shitty 4%

Reminder to SOL shorters that $1B worth of SOL is currently being unstaked and will hit users wallets in about 17-18 hours. This is just the beginning

>>52311991
>>52312153
>>52312241
>>52312952
>>52313420

Stop plundering on another man's life. Can't you be useful to the uterus that begets you whether on stables or alts.

When will Biz frens mind their own Biz.

>>52313970
STFU ignorant retard. We ask questions so we can get answers, not for assholes like you to tell us to mind our business. This is our business. It affects us