[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 109 KB, 1024x1024, external-content.duckduckgo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
694669 No.694669 [Reply] [Original]

Has there been anymore word on this rrat? If you didn't know, he's apparently been taking this almost year long break from art to independently design 6-8 Vtubers for a new Agency. Is there any more validity to this?

>> No.694742 [DELETED] 

If you actually think any individual, let alone an agency, would pay for a vtuber designed by him then you're even more of a schizo than Kiara antis. His art is only notable because it's porn.

>> No.694761

>>694669
He'd join gen 2 as Ina 2.0

>> No.697132

>>694669
No idea, but maybe.

Shadman can be very unpredictable really.

>> No.697324

>>694669
where did this rrat even come from?

>> No.697347

>>694669
shadman is trying to find a country that will let him use minors for lewdtubing.

>> No.697352

>>697324
His discord members and I think it was posted in /trashwvt/ months ago

>> No.697425

>>694669
Any vtuber he might design, he'd have to do it with another name. His shadman brand is infamous online and outside of shock value free marketing for the first week no serious company would willingly associate with shadbase dot com.

>> No.697427

>>694669
Why the fuck would anyone even want his shitty art?

>> No.697484

>>697427
Whether it be his own group he's starting or some company hired him is unknown. Again it's a rrat, but it makes sense. Seeing the time when he disappeared, then came back to tell everyone he's "working on something huge". Making and rigging 6 vtubers isn't easy whatsoever alone.
>>697425
True, unless it's his own.

>> No.697491

>>697427
Western Porn company getting into vtubers

>> No.697562

>>694669
>shadman

>> No.697567

>>694669
It's easy to recognise his art style and he is pretty infamouse SO I am not sure what kind of mad company would want Vtubers based on that.
Unless maybe some Porn Vtuber.

>> No.697571

>>694669
>Shadman

>> No.697608

>>697567
>Porn Vtuber(s)
Seeing as how Vshojo exists and are very popular, I don't doubt a porn vtuber company wouldn't be successful as well.

>> No.697611

>vShadman

>> No.697647

tasty rrat

>> No.697684

>>697608
>I don't doubt a porn vtuber company wouldn't be successful as well.
Unfortunately. Coomers would put them in the millions in no time.

>> No.697744

No way
He is going to get cancelled immediatly
No one is going to take that risk

>> No.697774

>>697744
>He is going to get cancelled immediatly
Do you think he gives a fuck? He's been cancelled a million times already lmao. Issue is finding a group of girls who don't care if they get cancelled and doxxed to hell

>> No.697827

>>697744
If there's one thing the >man of shad thrives on it's public outrage

>> No.697830

>>694669
>cute
>autistic
>rampant pedophile
Shadman should become a vtuber himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2PZSHU3qRQ

>> No.697948

>>697744
>No one is going to take that risk
Chaturbate, Pornhub or whatever porn companies might take that risk. Shad might even get Belle Delphine or Sasha Grey to play stream as one.

>> No.698032

>>697948
This. Ultimately coomers don't give a fuck. And Twitterfags who'll get angry won't fans before anyways. If Melody became popular and if this rrat is true then they'll be big. Vsh*j* will probably die too, since this new agency is even more degenerate

>> No.698762

>>698032
It's not a rrat. See for yourself:
https://twitter.com/HLive_En/status/1349792599373205507
They are the real deal and they want to penetrate the western market's virgin ass big time.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIAfu0RQ3L3wx9T90KsvVmg/channels?view=49&shelf_id=5
Vshojo are babies compared to them.

>> No.698818
File: 1.10 MB, 340x436, 66546.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
698818

>>694669

>> No.698872

>>694669
I hope he gets the most vile disgusting women to stream as them. I dont think shads art would be very good for vtubers so I dont believe this rrat but if it's true I'll be a happy man

>> No.698928

>>694669
I can't believe >man of shad will compete with vwhores now. This series is getting really good.

>> No.699061

>>697324
He says he has been working on some big project for a while now

>> No.699083

>>699061
What's hinting at porntubers?

>> No.699128
File: 1.32 MB, 512x384, shadman.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
699128

>>699083
Nothing really, its entirely speculation

>> No.699391
File: 973 KB, 718x720, 1541514403245.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
699391

>>694669

>> No.699545

>>697427
i don't think his normal art style would be very good for vtubing, but maybe shad has greater range than assumed.

>> No.699549

>blue rrat walking away

>> No.699650
File: 1.54 MB, 280x182, winslow.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
699650

>>699549
Surprised it hasn't been posted yet.

>> No.699721

>>699545
If anything Shad concept and a better artist finalizes the art

>> No.700748
File: 48 KB, 563x843, Dqb7t33VsAITvLp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
700748

>>694669
I honestly would like to see it happen.

>> No.700772

>>694669
Hopefully not, his art style is fucking ugly. No idea how the hell this guy became popular besides for "muh cool and edgy porn artist".

>> No.700831

>>698762
Jesus the fuck is this shit. But I will say, he's been "missing" for a while longer before this tweet was made. But I don't doubt it could still be the m or another company

>> No.700838

>>700772
cunny

>> No.701073
File: 1.99 MB, 1000x1079, 87739faaf282543813373d307de71aab.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
701073

>>699545
Shad has some range, but not towards the artstyle that would typically fit vtubers

>> No.701078
File: 410 KB, 1200x973, 1550629435416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
701078

>>700772
>besides for "muh cool and edgy porn artist".
His brap stuff is pretty good too

>> No.701239 [DELETED] 

>>701073
Would this >701078 style work for vtubers?

>> No.701260

>>701239
Only if they were brapping like in that picture.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action