[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 506 KB, 955x984, yacht.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56833320 No.56833320 [Reply] [Original]

Nijipeak thanks to advent

>> No.56833355

>>56833320
>4view Finana
What sorcery is this?

>> No.56833478
File: 146 KB, 463x453, 1622146128084.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56833478

>bandage
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
oh no no no no no
HHAHGAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>> No.56833700

>>56833355
raids

>> No.56833772
File: 57 KB, 770x654, Ren-zotto.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56833772

>>56833320
>Ren Zotto
No, it's Risotto

>> No.56833903

>>56833355
What were the thresholds again for 1view, 2view, 3view and 4view?
Also does the viewer base really overlap so much with Holo that it might sink their numbers that much?

>> No.56834234

>generic numberthread
something happen to holo isn't it

>> No.56834315
File: 40 KB, 527x465, 1683417345009294.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56834315

>>56834234
t.seething esl nijifag

>> No.56834450

>>56833320
Is Pomu normally that low? Also seems more like a buff due to someone graduating.

>> No.56834547

>>56834234
if you consider rushias new(old?) identity to still be hololive then yes eslchama.

>> No.56834966

>>56833903
It is just the number of digits in their viewer count.
1~9 is 1view
10~99 is 2view
100~999 is 3 view
etc.

>> No.56835166

>>56833903
>does the viewer base really overlap so much with Holo that it might sink their numbers that much?
No, their numbers were this terrible before Advent.

>> No.56835211

>>56833320
Isnt this their buff numbers due to mysta graduating?

>> No.56835406

>>56834234
Where do you from?

>> No.56835577

>>56833903
There isn't really a huge overlap between Niji and Hololive. There are some crossovers given that some fans stating they are both in their name but it's pretty small.

>> No.56837433

>>56833478
Will they make better names after that? Probably not

>> No.56838760

>>56833478
whack ass name

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action