[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 38 KB, 399x345, guuuu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42708484 No.42708484 [Reply] [Original]

How many members do you think Gura has?

>> No.42708514

>>42708484
Like, at least 12

>> No.42708588

Hang on, let me install TempleOS rq

>> No.42708647

>>42708484
Used to have about 30000.

>> No.42708695

>>42708484
I'll member her when she comes back.

>> No.42708706

More than she deserves

>> No.42708722

>>42708484
I'll refund a gifted sub for this lazy shitter

>> No.42708758

>>42708484
Probably around 11k-12k

>> No.42709270

her last member poster has 7.6k likes which she posted mid break. i’d guess around 15k at least

>> No.42709461

1 and that's me

>> No.42709499

>>42708484
More than anynother Holo

>> No.42709998

>>42708484
In her prime, how many members did she have?

>> No.42714784

There's a community of cunny connoisseurs socialising in there. I think they turned it into their own wacky forum board and will never leave.

>> No.42714851

>>42708484
40k accounts and it's all me

>> No.42718569

>>42708484
Atleast from what I’ve seen ALOT, number that actually show up changes depending on the stream

>> No.42722293

>>42708484
I scrolled back for like a year and a half, the 7.7k one is the most likes by far, so probably around 10k max. For comparison, most of Fauna's are 600-1.5k and IRyS like 900-2.5k.

>> No.42722309

At least 1

>> No.42722347

Yeah me

>> No.42723353
File: 121 KB, 1080x1349, 1675993635655.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42723353

>>42722293
An important poll would show better
Since not everyone press like, especially the japanese

>> No.42724824

>>42708484
Well she has two arms, two legs and a tail so I'd say 5

>> No.42725231

>>42723353
13,000*5 per month.
yea.. she's doing alright without streaming

>> No.42726244
File: 233 KB, 750x750, Rat what.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42726244

>>42725231
>65,000 dollars a month
Jesus fucking christ.

Shark is living life on easy mode. Even with the cut YouTube takes, that's a shit ton of money. She found the secret.

>> No.42727377

>>42708484
More than 10k

>> No.42727552

>>42726244
Don't forget Yagoo's cut. She's still making really good money, but not even close to $65k/mo. I'm thinking more like $30k

>> No.42727651

>>42726244
>>42727552
not all of them are in USD

>> No.42727727

>>42727651
Oh true, there's a lot of foreigners membered to her. So I'll drop my estimate to more like $20k/mo.

>> No.42727791

>>42708484
Probably 20k-30k (before her break)

>> No.42729244

>>42725231
This is nothing
Top JPs, who habitually put member-only after every 3D lives have like 30k members

>> No.42732844

At the height of her popularity, probably over 30k. She had 21.5k by the end of 2022. My guess is probably around 18k atm.

>> No.42732930

>>42708484
me

>> No.42734058

>>42708484

According to playboard, she gets about 12.3% viewership, so that's roughly 525k viewers on each video. As others have said, her average members only post gets between 4-8k likes, we'll take the middle of those two which is about 1.1% of her average video views or 0.014% of her total membership. I think it's a safe bet to assume not every single person responds, so let's be extremely gracious and say she has 5x that amount (Which would mean only 20% of her memberships interact with her by liking her posts). Doing all that, we can relatively guess she's got potentially 30k members, but probably a bit less than that.

If their income divide is the same as their SC split, they get 35% of each membership. If that were true and she had 30k members, she'd be getting $52,500/mo.

If we take the highest number of likes mentioned here of 7.6k as the absolute least amount she has, with the same divide, she's still getting $13,300 / mo.

She's raking it in doing absolutely nothing.

>> No.42739122

+1 I will rejoin when she starts streaming again. My trident is waiting for me.

>> No.42739186

>>42708484
>How many members
How many cucks you mean

>> No.42739203

>>42732844
this is only determined by members with activity, right? Likes/chats etc?

>> No.42739332

>>42739186
Not cucks but retards.
Willing to pay monthly for no streams

>> No.42739691
File: 28 KB, 716x320, Mem.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42739691

>>42727727
There are some that pay above her basic membership. Even though to no benefit.

>> No.42740006

>>42739691
True, but those are very much in the minority. Though it might offset some of the ARS memberships

>> No.42740275
File: 106 KB, 1112x660, 1675310585089558.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42740275

>>42734058
She's still raking in views without streaming.

But the real money is still the merch. YouTube is a small percentage in comparison. Not counting Dino Gura Plushie records, Gura's Pop Up Parade instantly hit number one in the charts...again, while she was not streaming.

TBF, she is putting much of that money back into her projects, increasing her mindshare and becoming the Ambassador of today.

>> No.42740443

>>42734058
I just compare it to Tyler1, he gets around the same amount of viewers as Gura had the same split Youtube gives before Twitch changed it and he loves spamming 2 to 3 minute ads. He made around 1.2 to 1.4 million in donations and subs over 2 years. You take off whatever cut you think Cover takes she is still prob making walking away with 300k a year from JUST SC,Subs, and Ad revenue.

>> No.42741232

>>42740275
This, her merch sales are so ridiculously popular most YouTube revenue hardly even matters even if she’s making a shit ton from that too.

I am curious though how well a consistent and motivated Gura’s stats would look like if she put in pekora or koyori hours.

I’m overall glad she got a break though, faggots /here/ are always quick to call her out for taking time off but HoloJP do it all the time with no explanation at all.

>> No.42744320

>>42727552
What you think hololives only taking 15%? More like 80.

>> No.42744368

>>42708484
20k is the low estimate

>> No.42744414

>>42708647
That chart was calculated based on the *total* amount of members posted in her chat over a year. Since people might not keep their membership forever and there might be silent members who don't chat, it is neither really accurate nor meaningful.

>> No.42746693

>>42708484
over 5k

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action