>>20473206
Jesus Christ I leave you fuckers alone for 8 hours to get some shuteye and you're already looping again.
Anyway, Round 2 Votes, as well as a couple additional matters:
Regarding thread management:
As I have not received any replies to >>20409001 regarding the voting system yet, I am setting it to vote again.
>What percentage of an answer should said answer have for it to take effect, ie >50%, >60%, >70% etc
>What happens if no answer passes the threshold? Revote with no Abstain option, vote fails, other suggestion?
>What happens in a two-way or three-way tie?
>What happens if the majority Abstains/is Undecided?
>Do we want a rep to be responsible for making posts like this one, where matters are voted on? Y/N
Summary: 3Y, 3N, 3U/A. Three-way tie, we either tiebreak or the vote does not pass.
The question to be voted on remains the same, but I am open to suggestions.
>As a matter of fact, what should the name of the planet be?
Summary: Multiple proposals but no convergence. Will require further examination. TBD
Current proposals include: Eavth, Planet - /vt/, Chubaearth, Vitalia, Vitria, Veetee, /vt/.
I personally believe this needs to be voted on for us to have some sort of consistency, though opinions differ.
Changing the question to:
>Should there be a unified name for the planet across all nations? Y/N
>Should /fbk/'s and /mion/'s locations be swapped? Y/N
Summary: 3Y, 6A. Vote does not pass. It seems most voters were not aware of the situation to vote.
This was a Sakuran proposal. I did think of including the details of the proposal in the question itself but I opted out of it in the end. I see now that was a mistake.
Therefore, this prompt will be revoted on. This time, I will be attaching the explanation Sakuran gave in their voting post:
>I have explained this before, but FBK interacts with the Stars in some degree, while Mio does not. This doesn't necessarily mean the threads themselves reflect this, but it would definitely make more sense if they were swapped. Additionally, FBK is an arctic fox, so being further north than Mio, who is I think a wolf in alpine forests, would make sense.
If the change were to be made, I would also suggest changing the size of the borders a bit, as /fbk/ is also represented in /bakatare/ and would get a bigger piece of land, while /mion/'s land would become smaller in the swap. /fbk/'s new land would be frozen however, so that should be accounted for
>Should /OKFAMS/ be also added on the map, perhaps around the area of /duck/, /mogu+/doog/, /fbk/, /mion/?
Y/N
Summary: 4Y, 2N, 3A. Results indecisive.
Sakuran retracts the proposal and puts it on hold until the end of March.
>Should /israel/ and [insert another new thread I forgot the name of] be added on the map? Y/N
Summary: 4Y, 3N, 2A for /aa/, 3Y, 3N, 3A for /israel/. Results indecisive, no clear majority.
Results could go either way depending on the Abstains. Reformulated:
>Should this be put on hold until the end of the
month to check again, or should /aa/ get a nation but /israel/ does not?
>What should happen at the poles?
Summary: Multiple proposals, converges on an ocean and a land mass.
On hold until >>20440107 returns with their proposals.
Regarding the Rushia situation:
>Regarding Jannies and the smiting that may or may not be incorporated into Rushia lore; what are they in
regards to our world/pantheon, and what effects and powers do they have? Specifically, assuming their existence
is acknowledged, what can be said for eg /meat/, that gets deleted on a regular basis?
Summary: Multiple suggestions, generally converge on jannies having mythical powers. Reformulated:
>Should we decide on further parameters, or reduce this to a discussion point and suggest lore when necessary?
>If the answer to the above is the former, what happens when the land the Chuubanite is on changes owner?
Summary: 2 for Qualities change accordingly, 2 for Qualities are lost when owner changes, 2 for Qualities remain
until exhausted/decayed, 2A, 1n/a. No real convergence, needs to be discussed further.
Results need to be clarified, therefore reformulated to:
>If/When a land changes owner, or when a piece of Chuubanite leaves the Area of Influence of its related deity, does the it lose it's powers and qualities (decaying slowly, as per /meat/, still counts as this) or does it keep them but no more of that type of Chuubanite is generated in the area?
1/2