YouTube new Updates

[Anonymous No.]

Antis BTFO!!

[Anonymous No.]

Dislikes were always a retarded and easily abusable system anyways.

[Anonymous No.]

oy vey

[Anonymous No.]

The whole "like" system has been flawed ever since facebook popularized it.

[Anonymous No.]

>all the replies going waaaaaaaaaaaah I can't raid stuff anymore waaaaaaaaah
Eat shit fucking cunts.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>can’t downvote Jewish propaganda anymore

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
She's saved

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042996
>why yes I'm giving money to jewgle but at least I dislike some random videos, sure showed them now

[Anonymous No.]

Does YT offer some built-in feature for spam protection, or is it just moderator bots?

[Anonymous No.]

Suzan doesn't want her vids to be down-voted.

[Anonymous No.]

Oh no, no more ghostbusters 2016 dislikes ratio.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042996
Always has been

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
wtf are these replies? i can't believe anyone actually gives a shit about dislikes and just want to be mad at youtube. nikocado consistently maintains a <1 like ratio and gets millions of views, it never mattered to begin with

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>can't dislike their propaganda but hey at least now vtubers wont get 10 dislikes !

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042877
This, we all know that the star system was the better option

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>make plugin for youtube that allows dislikes anyways
>make money off it via donations

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043046
if i'm not mistaken all chats have a built in anti spam thing
but it clearly doesn't work that well

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042996
On the other hand, sane people can't downvote your hysterical alt right bullshit anymore either.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
How does it fix anything? The option to disable like and dislike count have been implemented like years ago and nothing has changed

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
Hey moshe

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043189
because now actishit or whatever fucking company can come along, show "Look how critically acclaimed our trailer was!" with 50k likes, hiding the 580k dislikes

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043080
the few times that i pay attention to likes/dislikes ratio is when it's used for meme like that thanos "perfectly balanced" thing

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
Now disliking boost video in engagement. With this feature people will just move on and all sjw, alt right bullshit and much more attention whoring will drown in irrelevancy

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
They will just resort to harassing them on twitter or the comments.

[Anonymous No.]

Public doesn't need access to this information anyway. People will watch what algorithm decides to recommend for them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
Holy shit just fuck off with the boogeyman crap already.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Look at all the fucking idiots thinking this is a good thing and not realization that the most disliked video ever on YouTube is their own 2018 rewind shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
I don't really understand how this addresses the problem. I thought they spammed dislikes to screw with YouTube's algorithm. They'll still do it, content creators just won't be able to see they're doing it now, and their videos will be recommended less. If anything this makes the problem worse. All this does is make it more difficult to back your claims that YouTube is negligent against not activity with hard numbers.

[Anonymous No.]

So now what? Will they start spamming negative comments and upvote eachother to increase their notability? Relentlessly target the victim twitter? It's not like you got rid of them, they'll just find another way to harass

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
They are still bothered by that even to this today. I'm surprised they don't just outright remove dislikes altogether.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043234
should just go back to star system >>2043099

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
kek

[Anonymous No.]

Remember when you could see the dislikes in the video thumbnail? Made it much easier to avoid shit videos. Obviously youtube removed it so more people would watch videos.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043334
i actually agree with that yeah
much more elegant rating system

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042984
>having opinions is considered "raiding" now
/vt/fags really are fucking snowflakes, jesus. And yet they'll throw a dislike at every doxx video in a heartbeat. No self-awareness whatsoever

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
>alt right

[Anonymous No.]

>tfw don't ever like or dislike videos

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Then why show the upvotes either?
This whole thing is just a case of google wanting to obfuscate what people actually want to watch so they can upcharge for ads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
It's great isn't it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043234
Would be nice if they'd hide the like count too. Let people judge a video themselves.

[Anonymous No.]

>can't tell if a video is clickbait/trolling/a screamer or not unless I watch the whole thing
So, what's the actual advantage to the user on removing dislikes besides "waaah there's a tiny red bar on my screen next to the massive green one make it go away"?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
The fragility of people lol

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043468
they'd never do that, specifically so they, and their corporate partners can take advantage of it
>>2043487
thats the thing, to a regular youtube user there is no advantage at all, its a disadvantage at worst and an inconvenience at best

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043487
people have to click to see dislikes, which 99.99 percent of people are too lazy to do

and for those who do click, it makes it much easier to just straight up delete dislikes without being caught

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043374
Seeth and dilate boomer

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043461
Glorious. And now they're going to hide it. Google also advertised some dogshit videos on the homepage of their search engine, and that quickly racked up dislikes. This is just removal of criticism in the same way news outlets have removed comments.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043487
Ending racism, sexism etc

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043487
The only one who benefit from this are Miko, Coco, and corporate bullshit. Good for Hololive not so great for the others

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043487
Advertisers can't get easily criticized through the like/dislike bar anymore when they push retarded messages. I mean, advantage for Google's bottom line.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
honestly was not prepared for that
these retard's entire worldview is based on fake anime girls

[Anonymous No.]

it's not like they lately made any difference...
chinks literally lost to fujos, fags and earlier to jannies

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
This. Along with the illegitimate president's like/dislike ratios ever time he shows his face on a video.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043600
Hololive doesn't benefit, if anything it will very slightly harm them because it's less visible for white-knights. Chat-spam is the only anti activity they actually care about.

[Anonymous No.]

>H-heh, antis have no power. They're not worth acknowledging
>W-wah... is that... red pixels?!?! Next to the green ones!?!? AAAAAAAAHHH MY OISHI WILL BREAK FROM THIS SUSAN WONIGSKI HELP ME

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Oh boy I sure hope youtube doesnt create 10 new bugs with this added feature now...

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>can't skip a clickbaiting pajeet with his fake tutorial

[Anonymous No.]

AAAAAARGH! WE CANNOT DISLIKE VIDEOS ANYMORE

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043676
Chat spam is only on Coco chat and her mods actually pretty brutal against spam while membership only chat can prevent it.
Miko on the other hand just got bomb dislikes while her chat still save, so yeah It's a benefit for Hololive especially with the timing. Also the Oni from niji who got bombed

[Anonymous No.]

this is completely stupid. likes and dislikes are useful in many ways.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043659
Exactly. Sure, you may get bombarded with dislikes if you're in the thick of a spergout. But it fixes itself over time because the spergs will leave.
Nobody actually has a consistently large sized group of monkeys just camping their YouTube page to dislike videos. Just look at any controversial YouTube account and the likes/dislikes is mostly very favorable. The safety angle is horseshit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043804
I have done nothing but dislike videos all day.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043805
>Chat spam is only on Coco chat
Coco's collab partners also get spammed

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043600
Why does Miko get disproportionate dislikes?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043805
Dislike bombs do absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043676
>It's less visible for white knight.
Pretty sure western audience had been trained to give likes even without some harmful events.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043865
She has dedicated antis ever since she debuted. Mostly nijiniggers who bring up her JAV work

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043092
Yes, I very welcome this. Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043805
>Also the Oni from niji who got bombed
reminded me that those are also fujoshits bombing Rindou.. I think im starting to see a pattern here

[Anonymous No.]

Good for Hololive because it's a corporation.
Bad for us because the whole youtube is not cute chuubas

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043849
Yeah and membership only chat can prevent it and it looks like Hololive have been using some moderator, especially their main channel. I remember chink spam got instantly deleted at the 4girls collab yesterday.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043871
It actually help for the engagement afaik for pushing on YouTube algorithm.
There's so many controversial channel exploit the dislikes, mainly YouTube drama channel like Keemstar.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043889
Excuse me?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043978
and now they'll get the full advantage of being able to lie that their like ratio is massive, while still maintaining that engagement bonus from the now invisible dislikes
and then if people get fed up with dislikes not being visible, the shitbags can just turn it back on to show "see look im not lying take your meds schizos"

[Anonymous No.]

>mfw didn't participate in any like/dislike garbage nonsense
I'm surprised any of you actually spent the time to create a Youtube account or even bothering to log in just to make a like.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044019
Well, if you like being considered to be a nonfactor by your oshi...

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044019
You're not special because you choose to make watching videos more complicated, you're just a retarded faggot.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>amerisharts whining that they can't downvote their subversive propaganda vids anymore and actually have to leave their dungeons to go march for their beliefs instead of downvoting an internet video and thinking they actually did anything meaningful
>plus bugs, antis, fujos, and nijiniggers on suicide watch
Who else /feelingfuckingamazing/ here?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043334
>>2043099
should just go back to the old website completely. all they added over the years is cancer.

[Anonymous No.]

I'm genuinely blown away by people thinking this is a good (or even unimportant) thing
you can't tell me you've never clicked on a tutorial for something only to see it had 90% dislikes and realized "well that's not gonna work" or something that claims to be a song upload (before companies were doing that themselves or things like spotify were the norm) and seen the massive dislikes as proof it's either got dogshit audio quality or is a bait and switch to give you a jumpscare or whatever.

dislikes serve a very basic, useful purpose to a viewer and they shouldn't be removed just because you're afraid of your oshi having a meltdown over getting 12 dislikes compared to their 12k likes.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
dude no but my vtuber got 30 dislikes one time

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
I rather reading guides

[Anonymous No.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdGbOT8NXnE

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
b-but 90% of youtube is full with my oshi's vods and the antis are spamming the dislike button

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
If likes/dislikes or comments are disabled for unknown content creator, it will automatically make people question the content.
I doubt it will be much different with this system

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
Usually it's not hard to see people leave their thoughts in the comments, or to leave if the likes/comments are disabled

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
No, I never had any of those. I've seen useless videos, but those are just that, useless, not harmful bad. Also, my oshi's videos have some dislikes so fuck people, I vote for getting rid of the downvote button in general. Or make it affecting your account, like taking away privileges when you downvote too much.

[Anonymous No.]

They really need to defend star wars and biden don't they? Scrubbing the dislikes wasn't enough I guess they have to just completely remove them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
How the fuck am I suppose to look up mechanical and technical guide videos for the shit I do and find if its actually worth watching now?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
>you can't tell me you've never clicked on a tutorial
never done this
>something that claims to be a song upload (before companies were doing that themselves or things like spotify were the norm)
this only happens for the most popular shit that you shouldn't be using youtube to find anyway. i've never had this happen to me and i search for the most obscure shit

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
>huh, let me check the comments to make sure this isn't bogus
>comments are disabled = nope
>comments are enabled, but talking shit = nope
Trusting an arbitrary bar metric is room temp IQ shit, anon.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044240
>>2044205
you know the uploader can leave comments on just remove negative ones, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043889
spotted the nijinigger

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044240
you really think having to skim comments and parse the truth from the nonsense instead of having a "this video's bullshit" bar front and center is more convenient for the average person?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044182
Get a better oshi than that twich whore Miko or that reddit bitch Coco

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044286
I don't think I've ever seen anyone that dedicated on tutorial videos.
>>2044316
The average person is a fucking moron, then.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044240
what a shock, of course the KFP is in favor of removing anything that could be critical of the creator

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044410
>I don't think I've ever seen anyone that dedicated on tutorial videos
yeah, you're a fucking retard, stop having opinions.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043889
imagine hating porn...what a concept

[Anonymous No.]

>negative feedback is wrong
The absolute state of 4reddit

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
shut the fuck up, bergstien

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044685
if anything, defending hivemind is the more reddit position

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044135
I can tell if a video is going to be quality content within the first 5 seconds. If you can't you have low IQ.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>Disabling dislikes
If that doesn't scream please hate me I don't know what will

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044746
what the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044784
the people defending dislikes are the ones bringing up the youtube rewind video or other famously hated youtube videos. i can't imagine being butthurt about not being able to circlejerk how much you dislike a youtube video

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044826
>defending dislikes
they're defending a RATING SYSTEM you absolute fucking retard

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043374
Being a fucking faggot who dislike bombs channels for no reason is raiding, cry more anti.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044872
how are you this triggered over pedantry? do you have anything interesting to say or are you just gonna wet your diapy wipey

[Anonymous No.]

They should remove like/dislike count entirely including the comment section so I don't have see those comments for thousand times
>like this comment if you watching this video in [insert current year]
>No one: [insert unfunny joke]
>x: say something different y: am I joke to you?
>*literally quote in the video*
>Doc: you have [length of video] to live Me:
>Let's be honest, you didn't search for this

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044895
>that post
christ, i miss when reddit at least tried to fit in

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
This will be applied to all the corporate accounts (I guarantee Disney is the one who demanded it) and never get rolled out for regular users like chuubas.

[Anonymous No.]

Just make the likes and dislikes one number like >reddit does

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044895
>This user is underage

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044965
Seeing how comments have had a useless dislike button for a while I think their endgame has always been to remove dislikes enterely and they are just moving to the phase 2 of the change

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044960
>muh reddit
stay mad bitch boy

[Anonymous No.]

Looking forward to not having to see another "uhhh guys X has a ton of dislikes whats goin on?!" post

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044872
There's nothing rating in putting a negative on a video without any explanation.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044826
It has nothing to do with any particular video, it's a matter of principle. This is a means to restrain the viewer's ability to express a negative opinion. It's a typical "hurr durr cyberbullying" horseshit excuse.

That someone would advocate for that on 4chan of all places is mind boggling, but then again you are clearly reddit trash.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043675
didn't know what you were talking about so I looked into it
>It's real
but why? Is /pol/ just raiding every Biden news video?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043278
>>2043387
>>2043193
>boogeyman
Nigga's straight posting anti jew shit, go back you dont care about vtubers

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044895
Go back

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045162
>it's a matter of principle.
>holy fuck they removed dislikes from youtube, what an injustice
get a job bro

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
I know that the like and dislike buttons are both the same in the background. It's just a visual difference. So with this change what's the point of having a dislike button at all if you can't see the count for it? If they're not going to show the number for dislikes from a user's point of view, they might as well do the same for Likes and have both counts only visible to the owner of the channel.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045244
you go first and take your weak shit with you

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044925
Yikes yeah. People farming likes for some odd reason. I'd like likes from actual meaningful points.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045180
It isn't /pol/, there's barely any threads about a Biden video. Probably some overlap though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043487
Looking at the like to comment ratio might help

[Anonymous No.]

Just remove likes as a whole, if you enjoyed it then you watched the whole thing and that should get counted in some way.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045162
You are on a board about an indsutry that uses youtube as its main platform where dislike brigading, including people using bots and throwaway accounts to inflate it, is a common and constant issue for many of the creators from the small indies all the way up to the biggest. I don't really think its surprising that many people here would be in support of this.

[Anonymous No.]

Who the fuck actually defends this shit and why? Are people in the U.S really that much of little bitches?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045273
shut up faggot.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045322
Yikes yeah. People farming (You)s for some odd reason. I'd like (You)s from actual meaningful points.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045285
This. Having just a like count visible only encourages people to press it, which works great for pushing videos into the algorithm to make them go viral. But if the real point of the buttons is for them to be a rating system, then just hide both numbers and have it only visible to the creator. Then people will more often than not press what they want, rather than feel encouraged. Why do normal viewers even need to see the counts at all?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045399
>mad

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043080
>>2042834
>>2042877
>>2042900
>>2042984

The critical voices may or may not be rooted in this video of EmpLemon.
He's relatively influential.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdGbOT8NXnE

There should be a rating system. Dislikes are okay, stars are better.
In what way does Youtube profit, when they remove the dislike?
Cui bono?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045180
>check the white house's channel
LMFAO it's not even a rrat, is it? YT's literally doing it for biden

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043675
the angry cheeto lost. he's not president anymore, so he can't be an illegitimate president anymore either. also go back to /pol/ with your retardation. your containment board exists for a reason.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043099
I miss old Youtube

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044105
>muh subversive propaganda
>>>/pol/
you do a terrible job trying to pretend you're anything but a crossie lookingy to stir shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043234
Oh no!

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045398
>muh rating system
I really can't tell who's baiting you anymore in this thread.
Though I fear that those retards are actually serious.

[Anonymous No.]

>there are still people that think the like/dislike buttons actually do different things
Kek. They're basically pic related but backwards. It all goes to the same place. Visual candy.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045398
The only people who would benefit are people who upload corpo videos which everyone hates. That way people won't immediately see how shit the video's message is.
And then of course everyone will complain while this feature is in testing, it'll go away, and then eventually be rolled out sitewide without any way to get rid of it. The YouTube cycle continues

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045180
Blame Youtube suggesting videos to people who don't want to see them, which mostly affects normies who keep autoplay on and just watch whatever Youtube sends to them. Most people don't want to watch some dry political shit when they're binging, so they just toss it a dislike and click away.
pol is an easy boogeyman to point the blame at, but as with most "hate mobs" the majority of people are just normies that got the video in their recommended feed.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
wow who cares. it's not even a true rating system. they might as well label them green and red because all they do is filter videos into youtubes algorithm.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045627
Organised dislike bombing is a commonly used to tactic to harass and bully vtubers. vtubers would probably benefit from this and this is a board about vtubers.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044232
Like/view ratio

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045391
Then they should scrap the entire like/dislike system altogether. Giving visibility to positive feedback only obviously generates a bias.

The whole "dislike brigading" argument is clearly just an excuse. Even when there's a swarm of bugmen with a hateboner, it amounts to a thousand dislikes at most, among tens of thousands of likes.
Most people just don't bother disliking videos, even if they don't like them, and even if they don't like the person making them. The few autists motivated enough to increase the pixel size of a red bar are insignificant.

The L/D ratio only becomes significant when something is bad enough to make the average person click the dislike button. Stuff like Rewind, the Gilette video, corporate trannyshit etc. Curiously enough, that's the only kind of content this change would really protect, as the average content creator, vtubers included, rarely gets over 1% of dislikes on any given video.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045788
I think in the case of vtubers it specifically feeds into and grows hate/harrasment to an even wider extent outside of the dislike bar though. People see someone got slightly higher dislikes than usual and go find out what the drama is then join in the hate.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045788
>it amounts to a thousand dislikes at most, among tens of thousands of likes.
That's the point. The people complaining about dislikes are just genuinely autistic. They can't stand the fact that some retards out them hate them, even if it's at a merely 1/100 ratio. Which is why they'd just rather see the whole thing down.

[Anonymous No.]

>why yes I dislike every single video that has any kind of political discussion on it's title or thumbnail regardless of it's orientation and relevancy what gave it away

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Clearly some YouTube hotshot is a Miko fan and was distraught to see all those dislikes on her vids. Pretty based.....

[Anonymous No.]

Goddammit, why are you retards stupider than usual? Even Bezos, Mr. Big Corp, knew that negative reviews have a function, even if they're trolled.
This is just another idiot move from the small india tech company.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2046049
>join in the hate
Only autists do this, normalfags just want to be "in the know" but don't care besides that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>>2043234
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afaithTQSaI

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045193
If you are provtuber you are antijew, simple as. The primordial vtubers will it so.

[Anonymous No.]

The Youtube rating system is an absolute joke and does not give any feedback or information whatsoever. Hardly and Youtuber if any has ever legitimately been harmed by dislikes, they only boost their videos in the algorithm and get them more views and attention in the long run. The only people ever harmed by dislikes are corporations trying to advertise a product or msm outlets who are trying to worm their way into Youtube to escape their dying cable platforms after talking down to Youtubers and Youtube culture in general for many years prior.

The only way IMO for ratings to serve an actual purpose on Youtube is to tie it to comments by allowing people who post a comment to rate a video from 1 to 5 stars and have said rating appear next to their comment. Only allow people to rate if they've watched a significant portion of the video (Youtube already tracks watchtime so this shouldn't be hard at all to implement) to avoid people blindly rating a video without even watching it.

This way you no longer have videos that get 10K likes in the first 5 minutes with 50 or so random dislikes, in which nobody will ever have any idea why they were left in the first place, meaning the creator gets absolutely no feedback whatsoever, which is the entire point of a rating system to begin with.

[Anonymous No.]

Stupid idea from a company who keeps running one of its biggest sites into the ground. Google as a country would be a place that didn't have any signs warning of hazards because they don't want to make anyone feel unsafe, they'll just let everyone discover the dangers themselves.
You figure with the new monopoly they have for video sharing and streaming they would know what they are doing but is keeps getting showb they are seeminglt intent on ruining the platform all in the name of serving a few big companies.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2046928
Die phoneposting scum

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043286
Comedian Rabbit Bad

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Even before a view and a dislike was better than no view and a like so the system was always broken by design

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045193
where do you think you are?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2046913
>Only allow people to rate if they've watched a significant portion of the video
I really wonder why they haven't done this. Wouldn't it be simple? If it's a short, the entirety of the video, otherwise at least 10% of the video or 2 minutes, whatever is less.
It even allows big corps to keep shilling themselves, so nobody should have anything to complain.

[Anonymous No.]

>all these niggers agreeing with youtube's decision
/vt/ truly is the twitter of 4chan

[Anonymous No.]

>>2046984
Too long didn't read.
Moon Rabbit Bad

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045193
>Not being antijew
Good fucking goy.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047019
>i want people to be mad at a decision that won't have any actual impact
?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047019
>/vt/
>not youtube running damage control
>not tourists
You really think the autists care enough to leave their threads?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044111
>added
More like removed literally fucking everything

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>>5 star system
>oy vey they're 1 starring all our propaganda
>>like/dislike system
>oy vey they're disliking our propaganda
>>Likes only system
inb4 site wide comment curation

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
What a retarded idea that's going to lead to shittons of scammers pretending to be other channels. Ratings aren't just for differences in opinion, they're also a rating if the video is worth your time if it's a objective/factual type video.
What kind of shithead makes decisions for Youtube? Every year, it gets worse and worse.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047042
who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047085
Nah, that's for later
>oy very they're not liking our video enough
>>Views hidden by default

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047128
>being this new

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043099
Stars were great and it's fucking retarded that they removed them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044111
Ever since Google bought them out, they've become increasingly unconcerned with user satisfaction, and increasingly concerned with social engineering.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047121
The 2018 rewind video was the point where even normalfags noticed Youtube was retarded. So I think they just want to kill it but have become too big to fail.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047121
but muh antis

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047019
As usual, not even twitter like this decision. The comment that this was posted under on their youtube page is basically flooded with comments about how this is going to just result in scammers grabbing people's videos and stealing them, with no downvote system to let people know something is wrong (because this isn't the first time they tried to remove downvotes)

The people agreeing with it here are the usual shitposters trying to bait who should be ignored because they're retards.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043099
GIVE IT BACK
IT WAS OURS

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047121
UH OH
KFP cucks cant deny this truth

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047150
>>being this new
tell me more, newfag

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047019
Has anyone ever on any platform agreed with any of Youtube's recent decisions

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047227
Also I don't know if people remember but at one time, ratings were gone completely (just after they axed the 5 star system) and it was just a little bar under the video with no numeric indication of like/dislike and it was a free for all of indian and china channels taking popular videos, copying them word for word, and re-uploading them under a thousand different accounts.
The current like/dislike system was made to counter that. Picture if a Chinese scammer made a Hololive channel tomorrow and just started uploading all of Haato or Mori's videos, all of the links leading to their personal scam pages in teh comment section and robots boosting it with replies to overtake Mori's. Sound fictional? That's what they were doing before they made the current like/dislike system with gigantic channels before.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Hollywood likes this.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047338
They're going to be pissing their pants when all of the stuff they post gets re-uploaded to a thousand different accounts.
as usual, they only live in the moment, never considering the future.

[Anonymous No.]

What really brought this about is all the people down voting all mainstream media vids and anything to do with the current US president. Those get dislike bombed to to hell and back.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047309
No, they don't. The problem is that Youtube's president is so incompetent that she only makes decisions based on what a tiny circle of twitter tells her to do.
When she started her own youtube account, she required almost five different interns to record a video of her sitting behind her desk and talking into a phone camera because she was so fucking stupid she didn't know how to operate her iphone. This is the person in charge of the livelihood of all our Oshis.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044877
are you retarded? Just because some zhangs disliked your oshi's video doesnt mean the concept of dislike is flawed

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
The only way for antis to harass coco now is to pay for memberships
>no refunds zhang, sorry that’s the way it is now. Pay up or shut up piggy.

[Anonymous No.]

I liked seeing that my oshi had no dislikes on some of her videos...

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047019
>4chan
4channel. The website has evolved, and so should you. Being edgy is not relevant anymore.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047450
She's the menace who destroyed yahoo by the way. What do you expect with this jewish box wine lady?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
Fuck off shill

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
kys faggot, hiroshimas marketing split doesn't change anything

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
nigger

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
nigger faggot

[Anonymous No.]

>youtube changes rules to protect disney and will smith from investors and hurt feelings
>this is a win to tumblrites on /vt/

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
See, the tube likes to see dislikes as engagement

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
retarded autistic nigger faggot snowflake

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043562
Go cry other way bootlicker holonigger and stop with the sucking off a company balls.
Like you niggerfaggots think this company is the only company because is popular shit for retards.
Watch other vtubers.
You sound like many so y boys that like to consume only something because is popular.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
>this is why women should stay away from forums in general
being edgy is great

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048061

[Anonymous No.]

It's to prevent people from disliking political propaganda. You'll see MSNBC or CNN clips with more dislikes than likes, it probably gets under their skin.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048098
Yes.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048061
Stop being a retard

I agree about the dislike button though, you'd have to be an absolute retard to actually support removing this

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048160
No.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048113
>political propaganda
>not >>2047886
/pol/ is not the entire world, touristchama. Though the Biden dislikes probably also play a part, but only that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047492
couldnt give a fuck about the concept of a dislike being flawed or not, or how it effects youtube overall, but in the context of vtubers disliking is only ever really used to any noticeable extent for the sake of targeted harassment by antis regardless of being hololive or not, so yeah kind of happy if it gets turned off

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
Retardchama...

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047513

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
>Nooo you're not allowed to express negative feedback for my horrible content.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
you're fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
You have to be 18 to post on 4channel

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048221
ehh? It's definitely a mix of both. These media companies pay youtube to boost them afterall.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043286
Kek

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
Pic related.

>>2048317
That's what I was implying, though?

[Anonymous No.]

Can Biden please just sign an executive order to 5150 all chuds.

I am so fucking tired of every board i lurk being infested with you schizo faggots.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048221
It's the same reason everyone has almost universally disabled comment sections.

[Anonymous No.]

>Trannies are fuming that they can't dislike bomb anymore
>screaming about twitter and tumblr when they get made fun of
You know dislikes never mattered, right? Likes barely matter either.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048221
Disney shit has hardly been apolitical recently.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
>>couldnt give a fuck about the concept of a dislike being flawed or not
>but it's totally flawed because my oishi got a few hundred downvotes out of 10K upvotes
Hope you like running into clickbait and screamer videos without any warning, because that's what'll happen when people can't see dislikes

[Anonymous No.]

Imagine being a japanese anti that has subscribed and set all notifications up just so they can't miss a dislike and then this happens.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048228
Who cares? If Coco gets 2k dislikes to 30k likes or Miko even the relatively large number of 7k to 35k what does that actually do? Show that some people were mad at that point? Big fucking deal.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048395
I forgot to mention that they aren't really against with any of this even when they dont get paid as lonv as there's an incentive like an influence inside Washington DC. It also gives them some leverage to avoid any future liabilities. Their parent company has close ties to CIA afterall. Dont frame this as some kind of "it cant be helped" decision. They definitely like what they're doing

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048455
>oishi
Every time that mispelling comes up it's with a retarded take.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048455
i wouldn't even be using youtube if it wasn't for vtubers

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048448
>The Mandalorian shit, anon. Also, Star Wars is owned by Disney.
Was what I was about to say before realizing I was being retarded. That's just them pandering, but actual political stuff probably didn't get involved until >>2045658, which caused >>2045470

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
this is made to save your amerimutt mega corps like disney which constantly gets lots of dislikes. literally 99% of vtuber videos dont get any dislikes.

fuck mutts though. big tech and mega corps really collude with each other.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
Who cares, People will just switch to comment bombing it. Either way. Any videos who lacks comments and likes dislikes is now a read flag to advertisers for being shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>people here unironically consider a few hundred downvotes a "raid"
Fucking hell, Vsimps are insecure. The average popular Youtuber gets 1K dislikes out of 10K likes, and they literally could not give a shit. Yet you think these girls are gonna mentally crumble just like they do if they have a 1:20 dislike ratio. Quit being weak.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048643
didnt ask

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048643
But nobody has been talking about dislikes for a while? Fuck off, retard.

[Anonymous No.]

Imagine defending the concept of an upvote system and crying about not having it around to tell you what you should think about a video instead of forming your own thoughts. Reeks of reddit. Might as well demand that you get to upvote and downvote comments here too while you're at it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043249
Thanks for your optimistic post, anon

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048709
Stop being a retard, ever heard of tutorials? You know stuff you don't know much about and are looking for help?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048643
This board is full of literal children, anon, don't waste your time.

[Anonymous No.]

videos like this are gonna be absolutely protected by sjwtube. literally its what commies do. they cant take any criticism despite dominating the industry.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PCWUCv1rnU

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048643
>Yet you think these girls are gonna mentally crumble
you don't know girls do you?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048764
/co/ please go and stay go. And take your mutt trash with you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048764
>they actually fucking greenlit a character called "Safespace"

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048818
thats true. the "victims" are mostly /co/ trash

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042999
Was that your first time seeing someone get dislike bombed or something?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045788
>>2046090
I think the dislike-antis are just projecting. They're mentally weak and can't handle negative thoughts without breaking down into tears, so they assume the girls are just as weak as they are. If they got a hundred dislikes on a video they made, they'd crying in their bed for the entire day, so they assume the girls would do the same.

Unlike them, however, the girls have hundreds of thousands of likes to cushion them from the dislikes, so they really don't give a shit. And considering how the girls talk about disliking certain videos they've seen, I'd doubt they'd want it removed, either.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048848
Comics are safe now! The CCA would be proud of what they're accomplishing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048508
i'm just saying there is nothing but a positive impact for vtubers in getting rid of it, most of the concern in this thread seems to be about completely unrelated off topic shit like not being able to downvote things they don't agree with politically

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048848
There's one called Snowflake too.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042877
You realize youtube only did this so that they would no longer be embarrassed by the amount of dislikes they received on their own content like rewinds right? As well as hide dislikes received by companies that use the service. Like Blizzard for example. I liked the rating system more but sanitizing the internet further isn't helping anything.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048910
Anon, you're only seeing the sole drop of pure water in the Cleveland river. Not even Bezos argued in favour of removing the negative reviews.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048910
Just when I thought it was impossible for you to be any more retarded you prove me otherwise, bravo.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043804
>>2043850
I wish I had the voice to be a Soldier vtuber.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048910
I mean, I guess. A very nominal benefit to an almost nonexistent problem. On the list of things that keep vtubers up at night having dislikes on their videos is probably just slightly below Twitter giving their thumbnails weird alignment sometimes.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048764
>sjwtube
You're thinking too narrowly. Youtube will not allow a company, celebrity or government to be embarrassed in this way on their platform again.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043141
Funny, those videos never had a negative ratio

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048910
>most of the concern in this thread seems to be about completely unrelated off topic shit like not being able to downvote things they don't agree with politically
This entire thread is off-topic, anon. Might as well think about the bigger picture instead of trying to pretend V-tubers are the only thing on Youtube.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049162
>This entire thread is off-topic, anon.
Since a good chunk of vtubers use Youtube, especially the japanese ones, it IS on topic.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049200
But V-tubers don't care about dislikes, at all. They've never mentioned dislike "raids" of any sort in their streams, so there's no reason to believe they give a single shit about whether or not people like their content. And if they don't care about dislikes, then dislikes aren't V-tuber related, and are thus off-topic.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049314
The vtubers themselves probably don't, but who knows about their companies and the ones those companies pander to. Though I'm grasping at straws, so you're probably right.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
this is just going to push people to more extreme measures

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049314
funny how you gaslight about this discussion beinh offtopic when the opinions aren't on your favour anymore. Do a better job next time, youtube shill

[Anonymous No.]

NND chads keep winning

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049314
how a change to the platform vtubers use effects vtubers is an on topic discussion, using the thread as an excuse to complain about youtube more generally trying to protect companies or push some political agenda doesn't really have anything to do with vtubers though

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049390
You forgot to take your meds again, sheepchaama

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044111
>>2047071
Video responses should really make a comeback as well, such a good feature removed for no reason

[Anonymous No.]

So, just to be clear, while a like/dislike system is stupid and there are better alternatives, dislikes being AWAY'd is retarded, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043310
>and not realization that the most disliked video ever on YouTube is their own 2018 rewind shit.
The teams at YouTube implementing this and the one that produced that video are entirely different.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049530
newfags don't remember video response channels taking over reccs like vtubers do now

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049080
most videos that get many dislikes are the ones from mega corps that go way too far in an sjw way or are actually dishonest as fuck like a blatant lie/scam. idk about that shit but dablo is also mega corp garbage that doesnt need to be protected.

why would anyone want to defend dishonest mega corp trash.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049508
muh meds

[Anonymous No.]

A reminder that CC being AWAY'd killed that one video.
>EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM IS A WHORE
>>INCLUDING YOU

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049631
You found them? Good! Now take them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049456
>using the thread as an excuse to complain about youtube more generally trying to protect companies or push some political agenda doesn't really have anything to do with vtubers though
But all of those are valid reasons to be against this system, while the only "pro" is apparently "my waifu won't break down and cry when she gets a few hundred dislikes". Except she never did that, because she's mentally stable, so in reality this change does nothing positive.

There are literally too many negatives to this to ignore, and not enough positives to counteract them. No positives at all really, at least for individuals.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049424
If only NND worked decently outside Japan. It's a buffering low quality mess.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
More and more we drift to the abyss.
Hail the Technocrats

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044872
>they're defending a RATING SYSTEM
And the current rating system is fucking garbage and should've revamped
As it stands it only works with two extremes with absolutely, there's no way to gauge an actual critical response from a like/dislike bar
And more often then not large dislike ratios are results from hate circlejerks, or raids that target the creator themselves rather than the actual content

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049737
the shill shouts "take meds" as he strikes you

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049770
they don't have anything to do with vtubers

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
bring back stars cowards
you won't

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042877
It doesn't matter if it was abusable. With this change it filters out negative reception and that's fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049805
Hopefully you will be an actual human being in your next time life, this one looks fucked, I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049826
>bring back stars
Stars would bury the shit out of videos like >>2049080, >>2047886 and >>2045470, so never.

[Anonymous No.]

A reminder that Susan's team is running dammage control everywhere, and the plan for this hellhole is to make it "off-topic", so it's not discussed since, it doesn't affect you, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049566
Watch time already does a good job at measuring how good a video is for a user compared to the other videos they are watching.
>>2049828
It's not good for people to obsess over negative things. People should focus on things they like as opposed to things they hate.

[Anonymous No.]

fuck youtube

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047580
Nigger fuck off

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049965
>Watch time
Where can I, a retarded normalfag, see this?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049809
They're still a part of this change, whether you want them to be or not. You can't discuss the idea of removing dislikes, and pretend it only affects Vtubers just because the thread's on the Vtuber board. At least, you can't do that and still expect your argument to be taken seriously. Because you're literally ignoring evidence just because it doesn't suit your narrative.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049885
shills like you arent human though

[Anonymous No.]

Thanks for the damage control, Susan. I was THIS close to questioning you and your team's excellent decisions. Have this pic. You can save it. It's all yours.

[Anonymous No.]

This place is reddit tier now

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050004
You can't see it not can you even see your own watch time. It influences your recommendations though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050100
Just a friendly advice for your future trolling attempts - switch it up, don't repeat the same insult in every post, that's lazy and kills any motivation to shitpost.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050259
If that would make you shut up, good. Now fuck off youtube shill

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050199
>a thread about a company filled with shills, tourists and trolls
whatdidyouexpect.mp3

[Anonymous No.]

>>2049080

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050294
What kind of world surrounds you, anon? What made you into a retarded husk of a man you are now? Let your example be a warning.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050336
stop projecting

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050354
If only someone could project some light into your life, I'll pray for that to happen, anon, stay safe.

[Anonymous No.]

i wonder why this is happening

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050336
I wonder if Share or Act didn't pay enough, so you moved to Youtube.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
whats the point of likes without dislikes?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050397
See >>2045658.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050404
If only you would act instead of doing nothing, maybe everything would not be lost. At least share some of that dandruff, you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050397
graduation soon

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050471
>dandruff
Anon, I think your thesaurus failed you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050527
It's the jews

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050563

[Anonymous No.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ussCHoQttyQ

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050618
Niggerfaggot.

[Anonymous No.]

I will protect every JP anime girl

[Anonymous No.]

>>2050416
they literally want to protect mega corps and commies like chinks. alt-rights were already all banned so now they are trying to protect corporate sjws and commies

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048996
I myself am very tempted to do an engineer gaming vtubing job but that's already being done by somebody. Maybe I'll go for BLU engie?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045193
I passively dislike jews and actively like vtubers. Maybe you should go back?

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045450
1. Prevent outside influence such as "Like Mobs" from giving creators a false sense of creating good content.
2. Likes lead to better performance in the YouTube algorithm, allowing hive minds and bots to censor opposing ideas by making them seem less valid (we already see this with bugmen).
3. Comments are a worse means of receiving feedback on your videos since there is no guarantee they're actually about the video, see comments for uploaded songs referencing the current year for a song from the 60s.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048441
(you)'re the schizo, anon

[Anonymous No.]

>>2042834
I guess Disney finally decided to call YT

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048887
Not as big as that. Not even chinks dislike bombed Coco that hard. Fujos are a force of nature.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2054627
Yeah so you only watch Hololive.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047039
yfw a jew posted this

[Anonymous No.]

>>2047028
reisen is pure you nigger tourist

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045538
>crossie
back 2 reddit nigger.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2044286
this. youtube as a platform has no reason not to hyperjew as a government agency. theres not a deranged bulldog in the government making them shit their pants anymore. they will do what they always wanted to do.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2045658
pol is a bombed out shill infested dump and only a few retards are dumb enough to spend all their time in a literal concentration camp. like boot camp i would recommend everyone go through it and expose themselves to authentic ideas and information amidst the trolling, turmoils, and lies, but after iotbw the mods have made it clear they wont allow any more organized anything. The idea that the board could raid or accomplish anything big like disliking shit is hilariously wrong. most nazi likes come from funny junk. Still, I dont mind a bunch of fucking retarded shills trying to larp like we're yeug! What a bunch of morons, it never gets old desu.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2048441
>oh no, every board is filled with *reddit buzzwords*, why can't daddy government get rid of the *reddit buzzword* who hurt my feefees?
Go back nigger.

[Anonymous No.]

>>2043080
it was pretty useful back when youtube would show you the like ratio in the search results. but they realized that hiding that information from users would lead to increased viewtime on videos most people would have otherwise skipped altogether. same shit with netflix removing their rating system since people wouldn't bother with low rated movies for the most part.

[Anonymous No.]

>b-but precious feedback!
THEY DON'T ACTUALLY REMOVE THE DISLIKES RETARDS, THE CREATOR WILL BE ABLE TO SEE THEM JUST FINE

[Anonymous No.]

>>2061268
it's only to protect corporate youtube channels, just look at the list of most disliked videos on youtube. anyways, this is a ripe opportunity to start up a few scam channels since users won't question why the likes are disabled anymore.