/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

[Anonymous No.]

>Actually partaking in a severe breach of contract

She deserved it, didn't she?

[Anonymous No.]

Do we have more info now?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765113
yakuza affiliation

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765113
Anally raped gyari in front of gyari, which is a severe breach of contract

[Anonymous No.]

Alright, give me your best rrats for why she got shit-canned. Bullshit replies only.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765130
>>1765178
I'll take that as a 'no'

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765106
Who knows.

[Anonymous No.]

She obviously left because her 1-year anniversary costume looked terrible and needed a way out so she didn't have to premiere in it.

[Anonymous No.]

Gyari would probably give her a meme costume like a literal magnet or something. Also yes she did deserve it no matter how much you liked her

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765188
She violated the geneva conventions.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765266
>Her new model was so horrible she killed herself
>Suicide is a severe breach of contract

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765188
She and gyari got into an argument over WW2 and she said the bombings of Hiroshima and Nakasaki were completely justified and legal acts of war. Gyari is an Imperial Japan apologist. You do the math.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765113
the most accepted rrat is that she was a government employee and its illegal for employees of the goverment in Japan to have secondary sources of revenue

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765106
No one deserves anything

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765266
After seeing the 2 other costumes. I wouldn't be surprised if gyari rage fired her after she looked at her new costume and called it an unholy abomination that is an affront to creation and should never have been made.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766601
t.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765666
We need more drama than that anon.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766601
Based and egopilled

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766690
i mean if you want drama you can go with the rrat of her meeting and fucking her tier3 subs irl.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765666
trips confirm I guess

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765106
Yes

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766762
you would trust the actual devil?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766814
more than you

[Anonymous No.]

>>1766814
You can always trust Lawful Evil individuals to keep their word. You can't trust them to not exploit you for personal gain or kill you when you're no longer useful. But they will keep their word.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1765106
Yes. She broke her contract, and therefore is responsible for her mistakes and must face the consequences. Fagnets cannot process this in their smooth and juvenile brains.