>>1608498
>>1608449
Sorry, I should have been more clear. Learning about someone's preferences for music, games, art I think is fine. That's something you can't make up. But stuff like zodiac, blood type, MBTI stuff, wouldn't that increase the likelihood of knowing the person in real life? ...is at least what I had in mind. Even if the zodiac and blood type do not, I think I would be against MBTI since those tests are designed with inputting accurate info about yourself to determine XYZ, right?