/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

The world is Full of pedos I guess

>>78395458
RRR
R R
RRR
R R
R R

>>78395458
100 mil for a japanese song is wild
there are only 120 million jp speakers. so the vast majority of the views:
- have no idea about what the song is saying (i'm EOP and personally still don't know if this is anti or pro loli)
- are from people looping this instead of playing it once for novelty

>>78395458
Me
Lolikami spends 281days 22 hours 45mins reaching 100M views!!!

>>78395523
Ui, Our beloved Loli lord

ナイスロリ

>>78395523

>>78395458

>>78395458
based pedophile anthem.
Antis are not welcome in our hobby.

>>78396818
We welcome everyone become one of us

https://x.com/tobun_sub/status/1797907743808077882

>>78396818
Who fucking care them?

>>78395523
Yeah? It's literally ran by them.

>>78397194
A large portion of people love loli. That's fact

>>78395458
Holy Fuck

>>78395523

>>78397957
Good proof

>>78397957
This graph is completely bullshit, just by the fact that 8 year old is at 0. There's no way low teens are where the peak is, those are basically hag lite.

>>78397957
graph is not just the same without kuro and illya holding it.

>>78398063
>>78398152
From this study:
https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80039-5

>>78398224
Thanks anon

not really beating the lolicon = pedo allegations

>>78398224
Nah has to be biased data, like 10 is the maximum acceptable age, everything beyond that is hag lite. There is no way everything below 9 is 0. Fuck off with your hag propaganda

>>78398213
Please prove it

>>78398443
>hag lite
WTF is this?

Shotacons... when will we get our win?

>>78395458
SUISEI LOST

>>78395675
>(i'm EOP and personally still don't know if this is anti or pro loli)
It's anti but in an in-jokey kinda way, like roasting your friends.

>>78395458
>100 millions
Free english lesson for ESL, you dont need to make that plural, I know it feels like you should because you are talking about more than one million but you dont.
Example: "There were millions of them"
"How many exactly?"
"100 million"

>>78395675
Imagine a hot woman in a lewd outfit shaking her ass and saying she will punish all the coomers and send them to hell
Its kinda like that

>>78399000
Do you Bibideba reach 50 million within 2 month?

>>78399154
Thanks for your teaching

>>78395458

>>78399256
Loli Kami vs Bibideba

>>78395458
Cunny rules

>>78395523
>>78397957
Nigger

Stop projecting

>>78398894
Homos will never have a hit song

>>78398894
If Bibideba can keep current pace, it will be simple to reach 100M earlier than Lolikami

>>78395523
And the sky is blue

>>78400336
>corpo vs indie
resources are not comparable, holotard honoring his name as always.

>>78400336
Linear growthchad.

UI really has it good. pretty much a holo without the corpo baggage

>>78402559
>Algo war
>indie vs corpo
You're retarded

>>78398894
she's gonna do it
surely

>>78397957
They should do this study more, I'm curious how true it is.

>>78403311
she's bigger than hololive and more talented than any holomem

>>78397194
Although you're correct, the grammatically correct phrasing would be "it's literally run by them".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKxyLmbOc0Q

still the biggest chubba winner

R

A

P

>>78398152
>>78398443
Memes aside this is what needs to be taken into context when viewing the chart, considering the demographic being sampled. If you were to test convicted sex offenders or men from politically powerful families, the result would obviously be quite different.

>>78410656
Namirin is by definition not a vtuber.

>>78412183
Technically she debuted as a vtuber but only like 3 years after the song.

>>78395458

>>78395458
Would the song have still been popular if:

- It didn't have a catchy dance.

>>78412183
Basically: do you really think real people in real life would feel safe replying "yeah, I'd totally fuck an 8 year old girl" out loud? That shit you keep in and never let ANYBODY know.

>>78415931
IIRC it wasn't a questionnaire, but an actual electrode attached to the body checking for a response. It eliminates some of the bullshit but isn't foolproof, since social conditioning can be applied deeply enough to condition even physiological responses, as seen in traumas and phobias.

>>78416353
Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know that. I guess it's not quite as I said but still something you keep buried deep inside since in that moment you know people will be able to judge you.

>>78416755
The body eventually abstracts that kind of thing into a direct fear or avoidance response after long enough. They won't even know they're hiding it.

>>78399043
That’s the exact opposite of anti. Do you know what friends are?

>>78410771
>>78411576
>>78411898
this aint a mori thread

>>78397194
Oh yeah, I remember it, you are not wrong lol.

>>78395523
It has to do with neoteny and general societal advantages but I'm not a biology schizo so I can't confirm anything beyond my initial suspicions about why even.

>>78399043
Yeah, like how this song was an anti.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_3_-UrhZH0

>>78395458
ACTUALLY this is an antilolicon song.
>but but but my mesugaki
antilolicon song

>>78395458
It's good, but I honestly think the Turbo eurobeat remix is even better. It's my preferred version.

>>78423339
Is nothing sacred to you?

>>78426436
lol retard

>>78426817
The what now?

>>78395458
100 million more!

>>78430797
Eurobeat remix by Turbo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLygLLe9a_E

>>78395458
Lolicons winning.

>>78395458
Suisei could never

>>78396870
What is she doing?

>>78423339
I look and sound like that

BASED
PedoGODs keep winning
kneel normies

>>78395523
yes

>>78395458

>>78443299
What does the R stand for?

>>78397957
Going to need some context for that graph. There is absolutely no way most men find 13 year olds the most attractive.

>>78445848
>13
it's 14

>>78445848
>>78398224

>>78395458
do incels still think that the song is pro-loli?

>>78395458
pachi pachi pachi

>>78398224
Ok so study involved 80 men and there doesnt seem to be any pre screening mentioned and some of the volunteers got super aroused by everything. So, what are the chances that actual pedophiles or porn obsessed coomers volunteered just to see some pictures of naked kids as part of a study?

>>78446933
many people seem to agree with the results though

>>78395523
always have been

>>78445848
Literally just put a picture of a 14yo and a 24yo next to each other and dont reveal the age

>>78448006
If you read the paper they did a bit more than that. Both clothed and fully nude pictures of all ages, with an audio playing a narration of either: consensual sex with an adult woman, """consensual""" sex with a child, violent sadistic rape of a child, or just general violence to a child.

>>78448415
14yo can consent in my country

>>78446933
Ok, but where's the people aroused by 8 year olds? Why did only hebephiles volunteer for the study?

>>78445848
>>78448006
Interesting you mention that. In ads for adult friend finder and similar sites they used pictures that 12-16 year olds, in various states of undress, had put up on sites like Lunarstorm

>>78446933
>>78448618
They weren't told the exact nature of the study beyond "sexual preferences" until they actually responded to the ad, at which point multiple men dropped out.

>>78448618
Pedo are in jail or browsing their super secret club.

>>78448898
>browsing their super secret club.
Not so much in 1995.

>>78448987
Why do you think internet evolved this fast ?

>>78398224
Nothing in that study says anything about specific ages though, they only tested adult and child with clothed, nude, rape and consensual depictions. They didnt test for specific ages.

>>78449443
So a boner test?

>>78395458

>>78449982
Yeah, that is what the study did. So, I still dont know where the graph came from because it doesnt seem to have come from the study the other anon posted.

>>78450384
Seems like a bad study when guys can get boners for no reason, let alone from stress.

>>78450291
oh god she even got the moves down

>>78397194
No no those ones target REAL lolis. Those don't matter we need to protect the DRAWN FAKE Lolis!

>>78451427
Its also pretty old at this point, almost 30 years. The study only says that some of the men got hard on pedophilic stimuli, not that they preferred pedohilic images to adult ones so either anon linked the wrong study or he just made up the graph and is talking out his ass.

>>78450384
how fucking new are you, everyone here knows the graph is made up (did you really think this kind of graph would be made?). Everyone is just pretending this graph is real for the sake of discuss

>>78453790
More like anon makes up bullship graph and bunch of anons eat it up because it confirms their worldviews or some other bullshit beliefs and they continue posting it.

>>78454034
Nta, this graph has been posted on 4chan in one form or another for well over a decade. I think that's what the anon you're replying to is saying.

>>78454034
Why would this graph reaffirm my world view? This graph is hag lite propaganda, girls are best before 10

>>78454697
yeah and I dont think many anons post it or comment about it ironically

>>78395523
Now you see our power

>>78395458
Congratualtion Ui-chan, I'l creampie you again as a reward

>>78395458
Can't wait to see Ui's reaction. Maybe that will bring 9yo Ui back for another stream

>>78397957
If they do the research again they'll see the atrractive age have reduced a bit

>>78395458
And now Ui is forever known as lolikami

>>78395523
The west has fallen...

>new MV is just her sticking her tongue out and shaking her ass
So it’s pretty much confirmed now that she’s not only aware of the RAPE meme, but also leaning into rapebait, yes?

Shigure Ui, my beloved queen of trash. <3

>>78399154
Funnily enough, this is actually a modern change; in ye olden times (to the 1800s, at least), the plural millions was proper, leading to the even more awkward phrasings of money as (for example) "twenty millions of dollars".

>>78452599
>almost 30 years
Unfortunately, under the former law (obscenity) scientific purpose is allowed, while the current law (starting about 2000) looked specifically at cyberpunk and doesn't have a specific exception for anything (including scientific etc. uses.)

>>78395523
>>78397957
>>78398152
>>78398224
>>78448618
>>78448807
>>78449443
>>78454034

Ok fags, let's settle this right now.
https://poal.me/m5conk

>>78460817
Yeah, it have gone full circle again. In medieval time, research against god's teaching is prohibited. This time against your government's teaching is not allowed. Good job hindering progress of humanity

>>78461759
>t. least obvious honeypot

>>78463325
You can't be arrested for thoughts yet, it's getting there but not quite yet.

>>78395458
all me

>>78395523
oh no lines on a paper lead real animals!!!
ack!

>>78395523
kek

>>78395458
She should just be a loli all the time

>>78445848
tits or gtfo

>>78450291
aaaaaAAAAAA

>>78446933
> Only 80 people, biased sample!
>He doesn't know about the longitudinal studies or the demographic studies, but acts like he's not just a lost midwit
It's settled science, sorry.

>>78397957
>>78398224
>ohio
>Examined among 80 men drawn from a community sample of volunteers
>Their mean age was 38.3 years (SD =10.74, range = 19-66)
>Fifty-two subjects were Caucasian, 25 were African American, 2 were Hispanic, and 1 was Asian American
lmao

Using studies is fine but please scrutinize all parts of it before you come to some retarded conclusion

>>78484649
You could literally run a test in California of 100 men, and when it turns out 50-75% identify as gay or bi or something other than straight are you going to claim that sample size is indicative of all men everywhere?
Come on now
The only thing that studied proved was people in the area at that age were pedos
That's it