/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

I hate people who say 'guess' and then actually expect me to guess

Big if true

>>69222817
mine? again?

>>69222817
Don't worry Pomu will cover for her- oops she's not around anymore!

>>69222817
Mine? PLEASE I need those bad dragons

embezzlement doko?

monetized the drama streams for nothing baka

>>69222817
Source: I'm Jewish

yeah and I just got a blowjob from Henya

>>69222817
Proof doko

stick your gyurrat out for elirbezzler

>>69225793
kek

Why the fuck does the bank charge me for being overdrawn? If I don't have $5 then I damn sure don't have $55.

>>69222817
Post prooj

>>69226308
Punishment for being poor.
I'm sure the excuse is
>if we punish you for it, you won't do it again
but it's really just because you're poor and they hate you.

>>69226352
Good. Fuck poorfags.

>>69223193
It keeps happening because you keep over-drawing to buy figurines and donating to vtubers

>>69222817
(You)rs?

>>69226308
because they want you to take a loan and own them even more money

>>69226977
>>69226308
Banks give loans. They use the savings and checkings accounts of other customers to do this - take a little from persons A, B, C, D etc to give to person J. Person J pays his loan back and the others get theirs eventually
Normally this wouldn't be a problem UNLESS there's overdrawn accounts or everybody suddenly wants to withdraw everything
Banks also take out loans from other banks and use your money as collateral, which again is not a problem UNLESS you have no money or you and your pals withdraw it all

>>69226308
It's a poverty tax. It keeps poor people poor by ensuring they spend more. You can't be rich without others being poor, so keeping the masses poor is beneficial to the rich. For further reading, consider the Sam Vimes 'Boots' theory, brought forth by Sir Terry Pratchett:
>The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.
>Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
>But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
>This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.

>>69227388
Nobody is stopping the poorfag from making his own boots.
What you wrote is a good example of 'Sklavenmoral'.

>slaves respond to master morality with their slave morality. Unlike master morality, which is sentiment, slave morality is based on ressentiment—devaluing what the master values and what the slave does not have. As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it vilifies its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality. As such, it is characterized by pessimism and cynicism. Slave morality is created in opposition to what master morality values as good.

>>69227977
I'm pretty sure it's actually more expensive to make your own boots. Just considering the reduced costs from mass production and all. The rest of what you posted just sounds like it's glorifying the notion of oppressing others. Which is pretty shit behavior in all honesty.

>>69227388
If he was wearing nothing before any boots, he clearly should just tolerate wearing nothing for one more month to save enough for the good boots.
Your example sounds more like a caution against being a stingy cunt.

>>69228442
People have expenses aside from boots anon. You can't just not spend any money for two whole months to save for boots. Don't be silly.

>>69228314
>The rest of what you posted just sounds like it's glorifying the notion of oppressing others.
Glorifying the opression of slaves, which is a natural thing. Water hydrates, food sustains, slaves slave, masters lord.

>Which is pretty shit behavior in all honesty.
According to what objective reasoning (human based reasoning is subjective)?

>>69228509
>You can't just not spend any money for two whole months to save for boots
Yes, you really can.
Diogenes lived in a barrel until he was 80 years old (then he died).

>>69228522
There is no debating this because you have already declared your own reasoning objective.
>>69228584
He also begged. The man didn't live in a barrel for 80 years without eating.

OP needs to deliver or GTFO. Her bank account being frozen is something she would never confide in anyone but her closest friends about, and those same close friends are the exact people that wouldn't leak the info.

Proof or GTFO

>>69228522
>This user is underage.

>>69228614
>The man didn't live in a barrel for 80 years without eating.
He did live for 80 years without boots though.
He threw away his only possession, a wooden bowl, when he saw a child drinking with his hands.

>>69228614
>There is no debating this because you have already declared your own reasoning objective
Objective reasoning is beyond human capability, was my point. I'm am closer to non-human, simply.
See:

'Judgements are based on what is, with reference to what should be - the kingdom of heaven, eternal concepts, or moral imperatives. But what should be does not exist: and this world cannot be judged in the name of nothing. '"The advantages of our times; nothing is true, everything is permitted".
- L'Homme révolté

>>69228782

>>69228869
>Australia
>OI YA CHEEKY CAHNT

>>69227259
This is old banking system, new banking system they just print money to match the national debt.

>>69222817
? Proof? Like, that'd be hilarious

>>69228814
>I'm am closer to non-human
Yeah I'll agree with you on that. Did you perhaps replace the human part with cringe?
>He did live for 80 years without boots though.
The boots were an example. But I suppose your non-human self is above the concept, so I'll explain it simply. Step by step.
Expensive items are often of higher quality, and therefore last longer.
Expensive items often cost less in the long run than repeatedly buying cheap, disposable, items.
However, the poor cannot afford said expensive items because they require an unreasonably large upfront cost relative to their income.
Therefore they are forced into cheap, inferior, goods that cost more over time.
Is that a simple enough explanation for you?

>>69229213
>Did you perhaps replace the human part with cringe
'Luke 18:14 Improved.—He that humbleth himself wisheth to be exalted'.
- Menschliches, Allzumenschliches

>the boots were an example...
I understood from the beginning.
The true question is: why should I care about him? You dodged the question.

>>69229516
Yeah okay. This is my fault. I should have dropped this a while ago. You are clearly a child trying to pretend to be ever so cool and above it all. It's my bad for ignoring the signs. The other guy was right. You are underage.

>>69229631
You can't answer the question.
I accept your concession.

You are clearly a woman.

>>69229719
You should have at least denied it.

>>69229631
To add: I'm quite literally just repeating what Nietzsche and Camus have said.
Oh, but of course, you are somehow better than them.

>>69229773
To what avail? When did you listen to the truth?

>>69226405
faggot

>>69229867
Stay off 4chan summerfag, we don't want you here. Better go before your mom sees you looking at anime feet pics

>>69226308
Why the fuck do people even overdraw? Just don't spend more than you have in your bank account. If you must, do it with a credit card.

>>69230240
I've been here since 2012, homo.
Internet had much less poorfags back then, especially of the foreign variety, seeing as smartphones were barely a thing and poorfags couldn't justify purchasing a computer. Poorfags have made 4chan, and the internet as a whole, less pleasurable.
There is no merit to poorfags, except as slaves.

You can't even refute this. I haven't even seen an attempt at refuting this.

>>69222817
That's what you get for voting for Justin T.

>>69228522
>>69228869
You again? Go back to /pol/, kid.

>>69230240
vivi is the stinkiest little femcel in Nji and i love her for it

>>69230423
>2012
lmao newfag redditor

>>69230423
>I've been here since 2012

We know you've been on 4chan since elementary school you fucking summerfag. Your retard level knowledge of lolbertarianism is glaringly obvious. Come back when you learn actual economics that doesn't come from Atlas Shrugged.

And besides that, you just outed yourself as a fucking Eurocuck >>69228869
Eat shit this is an American board.

>>69230631
HOLY FUCKING SHIT HOW DID I MISS THAT

>>69230671
>Friedrich Nietzcshe and Albert Camus are Libertarians
Read a damn book, homo.

>>69230423
Back to >>>/uhg/ nijitranny

>>69230671
Still couldn't refute that poorfags are only good as slaves, I see.

>American board
This 'board' is in the 'Japanese culture' section. You fuck off to plebbit.
Also, do Americans just like to admit that they aren't European (White)? Fucking hilarious.

>>69230702
2012 really was the end world as we knew it

>>69230732
>Nietzsche
>Camus

It's even worse than I thought. You're one of those teens. Go back to R*ddit

What are you retards even arguing about, nobody cares about this shit.

>>69230423
NTA but all of those vacuous 'philosophy' quotes you repeated said literally nothing of value and the people who said them were fucking retards justifying their own asinine preconceived notions.
You're the kind of unintelligent midwit who thinks that just because some old dead faggot with a fancy name said something that's quoted in a book somewhere it's automatically profound and meaningful and not just the prattling of some retard.
>Masters are inherently mastery and do master things, slaves are inherently slavey and do slave things, slaves don't like being oppressed, poorfags are sad about being poorfags, masters are selfish assholes and this is good just because that's how it is or something
what a whole load of nothing for a philosophy.
Just talking in circles to feel smug and superior about yourself when really if you actually were some kind of ubermensch you wouldn't be wasting away /here/ arguing with total nobodies on a mongolian basket weaving forum like an autistic faggot that just likes waffling about his autistic little special interest.

Kys pretentious pseud.
>>69230732
Nietzcshe and Camus were both also miserable pretentious cocksuckers that get quoted and repeated by midwits across the entire political spectrum.

>>69230860
>European
>White

What's next? Is Argentina white?

>>69230924
Oh, this retarded talking point again.
Come up with your own, original talking points.

this fucking thread made me log into my bank account just in case

>>69231170
retard

>>69231170
???????

>>69230924
>is good just because that's how it is or something
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman

>is good just because that's how it is or something
Ironic.
You've been saying: 'hurting the poor is bad because it just is or something'.

>>69231170
Not the person you’re responding to, but Nietzsche made that same type of argument lol

Also: Sartre > Camus

>>69230423
you were still in your dad's nutsack in 2012, stop lying on the internet or you'll get on the naughty list

>>69231235
See, he does this shit on /pol/ no doubt, and has therefore seen people pick apart his philosophical foundation numerous times.

That or he's trying to act like some edgy retard.

>>69231235
Either I've argued with you before or all you poors somehow magically have the same retarded arguing style.

>>69230941
It's always lovely to see Americans pretending they are white.

>>69231235
Every time someone points out to him that he just copypastes empty platitudes of old philosophers he responds with:
>hurr how about YOU come up with your own ideas???

>>69231336
No, he also does this shit /here/. I recognise the same 3 reaction images he always uses.

*sigh*
vtubers?

>>69231291
>Satre > Camus
lmao.
Yes, Satre, the super leftist that hated religion, who died believing in God 'just in case'. And was quite literally a cuck (his partner had multiple partners).

'To me, Sartre's excessively rabid stand against god is an ontological proof of his deep-down faith in some creator. The man (Sartre) is a closet believer who'll die not as an atheist but as a believer.'
- Albert Camus

>>69227388
Holy fucking reddit

>>69231451
>empty platitudes
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity
'Because you found something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, you made out like it's probably not true'.

>>69231451
God now that you mention it, why the fuck do I hear him with one of those fucking neckbeard lisps/speech impediments
>>69231531
No, no...Reddit is Liberal/center leaning outside of the Tanky communities. 4chan is where most of the anarchists come from.

Okay faggots, enough /pol/ retardation. Whose fucking bank account got put on the freezer?

>>69231552
Jesus christ dude this is high school tier shit. Go get a job. Go touch grass. Go kys

>>69226308
Two reasons:
Charges make them money, which collectively helps them cover the costs for various loss leaders they operate (such as free current accounts for non-poorfags).
They don't want you as a customer because you can't be monetized in other ways. You won't save, will be rejected for loans or take out any other fee paying services.

>>69231276
how is it a strawman? You laid out your descriptive worldview of masters and slaves and presented it as if it's self-evidently good without explaining why.
>You've been saying: 'hurting the poor is bad because it just is or something'.
I never said that, I said that your philosophy is simplistic and retarded. You're the one that now ironically actually has just set up a strawman.

I never said anything about the ethics or morality of your midwit worldview, it's just not even factually an acurrate description of the world or how anything works. Society isn't arranged in the form of slaves and masters and there isn't a clear delineation between the moralities of 'slave' type people and 'master' type people (whatever the fuck that arbitrary distinction even means in your autistic little head).

Your stated worldview is also contradictory because you claim the world is arranged in slaves and masters - and you seem to equate poorfags with these slaves - but then, despite the fact that by definition a slave has the value and function of providing for a master - you claim that poorfags have no merit. This is self-defeating your own argument and I don't think you even realize this, probably because you haven't actually thought it through like every midwit psued that just spouts their own little niche autistic worldview to feel superior about themselves.

>>69231774
>without explaining why.
You could have read it yourself, lazy cunt.
It's a strawman because you literally made shit up, instead of either asking for what it meant or staying silent on the matter.

>The essence of master morality is nobility. Other qualities that are often valued in master morality are open-mindedness, courage, truthfulness, trustworthiness, and an accurate sense of one's self-worth. Master morality begins in the "noble man"

>>69231738
>Saving
>Making money
Saving money hurts the economy.
Source: Post-Austerity economic ruin in Eurolandistan

>>69231774
>I never said anything about the ethics or morality of your midwit worldview
>>69228314
>Which is pretty shit behavior in all honesty.

>>69231774
>you claim that poorfags have no merit
'Except as slaves', I have literally said. So no, not self-defeating. Somehow you either didn't read properly or your brain omitted information detrimental to your sanity.

all this could've been avoided if OP just said whose account got frozen