/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>57953893
Why does youtube keep doing it?
Why did advent get spared?

>Advent had +100k pre-debut
>worst that they got was Biboo losing 2k
>Regloss is only around 50K
>lose around 35k across the board
???

>>57954841
Council lost over 200k subs each
Shit happens

>>57954374
We don't know, because even their main channel that upload a MV that longer than 30 sec teaser also got cull 2-3 times together with ReGloss.

>>57953893
KILL EVERY SINGLE NUMBERFAG WITH A DELI SLICER ONE SLICE AT A TIME FROM THE FEET UP

>people unsubbed dont resub
cope

>>57954374
ReGloss members have Chinese characters in their name, so Youtube thinks it's Chinese accounts being botted by Chinese subs

>>57953893
they were bots

>>57955495
so true sis
#cut4hex

Hololive got caught sub botting again just like how they sub bot council. Good thing youtube management caught council and removed 400k subs (yes they got sub culled twice 200k everytime)

here the evidence view botting

>>57953893
What I never got about this sub purge stuff is why can't those people just resub once they see they got unsubbed?
I've also never got unsubbed from any of the girls pre debut.

>>57953893
>interact with homo on twitter
>get shit number
every fucking time

>>57958850
god is an unicorn

>>57953893
stop botting the failures

If they are real followers, they will resub.
If they are bots, that's the point behind the purge.

>>57958579
It's kinda wild if you think about it enough.
One the one hand, people hold up subs as an important metric (team tribalism, social proof, more subs = my chuuba is objectively better than yours, etc) and cry and whine about muh subculls.
On the other hand, they pretty much admit that most of those subs are from such brainless retard tourists, instead of actually true committed fans, that they wouldn't notice when they're being unsubbed and would resub themselves. Basically the human equivalent of bots. Why jerk yourself off over a chuubas sub number when most of those unsubbed apparently don't care enough about the chuuba to resub?

>>57958579
retards lie and say youtube is actually keeping people subbed but not counting their subs as they slowly validate them. its a lie.

You'd THINK, after this happeneing MULTIPLE times already, Cover (or hell, any other corpo) would've figured this shit out by now.
Duh, an empty fresh channel gaining a massive influx of subs in a short time seemingly out of nowhere will get flagged as suspicious (because in most other cases, that are not rare exceptions like Hololive talent debuts, there actually is often foul play involved, and the algo doesn't make that fine distinction) and have a high chance of being culled.

The obvious solution is to not release an empty channel with no content, but to prepare some stuff beforehand like teasers, trailers, music, MV's, whatever, that they can put on their channel so the algo doesn't think "mmhm why would so many people sub to an empty channel? must be bots, let's cull them!" and instead just think "wow, those few short videos that channel released must've been really good, ok that's an understandable organic reason for their fast subgrowth, everything's a-ok here!".
Of course better preparation is still no guarantee that you won't get hit by a random subcull, but at least it lowers the risk massively. This should be basic 101 knowledge stuff for any company that basically makes their living off youtube, and they still fuck it up more often than not.

>>57959895
Are you repeating this brainless comment without even reading the thread? They had videos on there channel before they were announced. Even the main Dev_is channel was affected as well and that had more videos and a song on there. Don't try to act smart when clearly you didn't follow their channels at all. It seemed Advent was spared so it seemed like this conspiracy of having a video on a channel so subs don't get purged seemed true until Regloss happened.

>>57955464
You realize you wouldn’t get past the ankle before blood loss kills them, right anon?

>>57960200
1000 degree hot deli slicer that seals the wound as it slices

>>57954374
Purged by HoloGods for their sins; replied to Fucking Holostars tweets.
HoloGods giveth HoloGods taketh

>>57960103
I wonder if region of the YouTube accounts would affect this.
Would YouTube find it strange if a bunch of non JP accounts subbed to JP channels?

They should have used payed subs like Mumei does
It's a lot harder for the algorithm to pick up

>>57953893
Cry me a river. Council got culled 12 times before debuting

>>57958850
did the blue one also interact with homos?

>>57959895
>You'd THINK, after this happeneing MULTIPLE times already, Cover (or hell, any other corpo) would've figured this shit out by now.
You think YT has an official document on this?
They DID avoid this with HoloX, ID3, the newer homos, and Advent.
Why this happened to DEV_IS, nobody knows

>>57961585
Sana...

>>57958579
You don't get a "you have unsubbed from thsi and this account" notificaiton.

>>57961585
ohmygosh sistahs... council got 30k subs? they definitely didn't do as expected

>>57953893
only if they keep inflating their numbers with bots

>>57961585
Also had long wait before debut. Cover should've learned from HoloX

>>57953893
They just got one

>>57962211
it's bijouver

Subscribing to anyone before they've even debuted is weird practice in the first place

>>57953893
I sure hope so.

Even YouTube is an idolfag

>>57953893
Cover is retarded, what else is new?

>>57953893
we can hope so, but after two already i imagine youtube will have stepped in, which is a shame

>>57954872
no they didn't

>>57953893
This probably means those who subbed them and are now removed by Youtube are mostly hako-oshi fans. They dont watch all holomems but just sub all no matter what because of hako oshi enthusiasm. It meets the requirement of Youtubes cull. And the most notable thing is that casual holo jp fans, who love holomems but arent hako-oshi, didnt sub them at all. So ironically, they couldnt get any new audience the management wanted, not even casual holo jp fans.

I pity them but this branch will no longer get any new buff or momentum. They will just sink.

>>57965815
Whats this then >>57961585

>>57965815
Hello? Are you here? Can you answer >>57966294
Fled the thread like the little bitch that you are?

>>57961585
Holo X avoided the cull by debuting less than a day after being announced. How did Advent avoid it?

>>57953893
>Do you think they will get another sub purge before their debut?
Not as big as before