[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 101 KB, 380x214, iofihana.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24615033 No.24615033 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.24616658
File: 947 KB, 1158x898, 652169.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24616658

>>24615033
don't use my Oshi for your shit post, retard

>> No.24617361

>>24615033
Shut the fuck up, let me cope and seethe for a while

>> No.24617701

>>24615033
Hana brought this shit on herself, she got what she fucking wanted, to be cast aside as a niche. She literally was too hipster to go with starting to get liked broudly before HoloEN came and stole her nascent audience and blew her chance at rising with them instead of their rising at her expense.

>> No.24617979

>>24617701
>blew her entire branch's chance
ftfy

>> No.24618146

>>24615033
Iofi is the better singer you retard.

>> No.24618444
File: 21 KB, 685x447, images (3).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24618444

Anon....people aren't friendly when we touch on certain topics, so you should think twice before making this kind of post...

But if you did it with that intention, then I'll have to call you a retard too!

>> No.24620233

>>24618146
Iofi sounds like aqua

>> No.24620779

>>24615033
Atomized , obliterated

>> No.24620825

>>24615033
I'm a bit curious how was her peak numbers before HoloEn, even compared to risu and pikame?
I head these 3 was the main thing for EN audience for a while

>> No.24623589

>>24615033
Not here

>> No.24623853

>>24620825
sub 1k.
but that's because she didn't capitalize her growth.

>> No.24627219

>>24618444
You're right Ina. I will shun OP for this terrible decision.

>> No.24631867

>>24615033
if only Mika was around back then...

>> No.24633645

Nijibros?
I thought IDs were gonna incline once the branch gets axed merged with JPs???

>> No.24634594

>>24633645
No, that's KR. ID were fine on their own, I still don't understand why they decided to merge them.

>> No.24637193

>>24634594
because if they don't it'd look bad on their IPO

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action