/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

wah!

ohhh plans

Nobody took the challenge huh?

>>18457536

>>18457630
I was working on it but OP was too impatient to see himself be correct.
>>18457519

>>18457630
I think >>18457519 was planning on it but I saw "11" hit in the status bar and grugged the forced ABAYO.

>>18457645
>adjustment complaining hours

>>18457678
Never assume malice when incompetence is the most likely explanation.

>>18457678
Not Tampa, you had about twenty minutes from when the challenge was published, and that includes time when thread was on page 10. There was no reason for you not to post it.
And this illustrates the entire sentiment pretty well. Perhaps it truly is impossible to be the change you want to see... for you, specifically, since everyone else seems to be able to follow it just fine.

>>18457705
I was planning on it yes, but the pun title 'Rushia Hangs in the Balance edition' will have to wait.
>>18457725
Naruhodo and gomenasai.
>>18457771
I was too caught up with arguing and forgot, sorry. I honestly was working on it after posting >>18457519 but that wasn't fast enough to stop you from being a dick.

>>18457836
The only balance rushia is hanging on is my dick

>>18457519
>Does it actually take a significant amount of resources? I've never noticed (really)
And yes, it absolutely does. ~1 GB extra tacked onto your GPU process + ~400 MB for aggie itself.
>anonymity
The thread.
>profile pictures
Really?
>Easy to whisper/DM
NASFAQ has DMs
>gross to use in general
Why? You can pop the global chat out. I can't pop aggie chat out.

Why would I be smug about recycling OP?

>>18457836
How are you going to complain about thread quality when you were planning to use an OP that will drag the entire tourist, shitposter, dramanigger population into the thread?
too soon/poor taste
t. made a WEBM/soundpost out of that and dare not use it

Ya ya

>>18457911
>And yes, it absolutely does. ~1 GB extra tacked onto your GPU process + ~400 MB for aggie itself.
>he doesn't have a terminal aggie chat client

remember to check your autotraders

>>18458137

>>18457911
>filename
Could've used this

>>18457911
>1 GB extra tacked onto your GPU process + ~400 MB for aggie itself
Ok, I can't argue against that.
>The thread
Anonymous casual talk.
>Really?
Yes really, it's nice to see.
>NASFAQ has DMs
They're much more of a pain to use compared to those in the aggie. You cannot deny that.
>I can't pop aggie chat out
Just resize the chatbox and window. The aggie looks cleaner and is (I think) less laggy/buggy.

Because it proves your point about nobody on this 'side' making one.

I'll be honest, I didn't even consider that when I was trying to find an OP. I just wanted something relevant and not from the past few weeks. Sorry.

>>18458244
Haven't really got too many good bait images. And it didn't dawn on me until I saw their "choice" of recycled OP. Either they're dumb, or it was top shelf bait.
>>18458316
Oh, just a little dumb then.

Anyways, I can't really "argue" PFPs and DMs because that's a matter of taste and/or convenience. The lag every 15 minutes, fine. Popping out a window is >>>>>>>>>>UX vs anything I can do with an aggie chat not all of us have dual monitors. Compare aggie to nasfaq chat on a phone, for example, if you want a real example of the difference in resource utilization. Phoneposters still get the rope.

>Anonymous casual talk.
Now I am having a harder and harder time following your point here.
>Global chat = bad, because it will kill the thread
>Wants a platform to anonymously chat with users from the thread...
>Which would kill the thread
What exactly are you looking for? Don't say ERP I'll bloody choke you.

>>18458316
>They're much more of a pain to use compared to those in the aggie. You cannot deny that.
You cannot even dm people that aren't in the aggie. "Much more of a pain"? you still have type peoples username to actually dm them

My only problem with the global chat is that it's opened week long and that it has no images to easily tell people apart. Oh and you can't see who's online so you're kinda just talking to a void.

>>18458316
Should've broken the reply out to you separately so I could use this.
>>18458513
Stop. You can't fucking DM anonymous users on the aggie unless their nickname is no longer "Anonymous". It's either the best bait we've seen in weeks, or a really, really, really dumb anon.

>>18458560
>spoiler
That's a good feature though? Can't get unsolicited DMs if you stay anonymous

>>18458513
anon... You can just click their names

Hi-
Global chat will now be closed daily from 09:05 AM - 7:00 PM. Only an on-time HOUR NINETEEN post will unlock it. The aggie chat will be open 24/7, but it will be filled with 17 Anonymous dummy accounts that all have the blue bird profile picture.
floor id 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

>>18458560
>the anon talking about muh thread quality and muh global chat will kill the thread was just baiting
It was pretty obvious anon-chama

Jester I'm sorry, I gave my valentines to yonju because I knocked him down on the oshiboard
If I could give multiple I would reciprocate the love T-T

>>18458464
I am looking for ERP
Sorry, I didn't have much to >>>> with anonymous casual talk. I meant that you can talk casually AND anonymously in the aggie. Offtopic can go there without concern for identity, whereas in the global chat you cannot hide your username. Global chat (maybe?) subconsciously encourages game talk because it's on the website. In the aggie, there's considerably less game talk usually because it's separate, I can't really prove it, it just feels that way. Having lurked both, I have come to this conclusion. It's not based on bias, but experience. With regard to whispers, you really can just click their name and bam, you're whispering. If someone is 'anonymous' and wants to be whispered, they can just be told to change their name temporarily to something like 'anonnymous' and there wouldn't be a problem. They would still be anon, it's not like it's an automatic profile doxx.
>>18458560
>really, really, really dumb anon.
Maybe I am, and if I am, I'm sorry. I shouldn't have even made this argument because it's shit up the thread. I thought it was necessary, I felt strongly about it at the beginning. Now I just want to stop causing problems. Are you tired of this discussion? Would you like this to end?

>>18459114
>Global chat (maybe?) subconsciously encourages game talk because it's on the website. In the aggie, there's considerably less game talk usually because it's separate
Part of this is also that global chat is in the game so everyone can see it, even the people that don't use the thread, whereas the aggie is just people from the thread that specifically want to use the aggie.
I like the global chat but I do prefer the aggie for this reason.

>>18459114
I think I know who you are now. Don't beat yourself up...
I imagine the other Anon actually arguing against the global chat would also be arguing against the aggie, in this case. I thought it was all "global chat will kill the thread" but you were "global chat is lame, I like the aggie" without any "kills the thread" subtext.
For what it's worth, I don't think the aggie is going anywhere. And yes, I would miss you, even if you do shit up the thread sometimes or even if I don't like ERP in the thread.

>>18459299
I've been spying the global chat and I'm considering just not making the aggies anymore. I don't see the point of it now that people use global chat like the aggie.

>>18457617
Even for slants that gun is bad

>>18459370
Then I guess I'll have to try to start making aggies instead. Aggie love.

>>18459370
I stand corrected.

I think >>18459114 would appreciate the aggie. I'd still draw sometimes too. Even when they're sparse, it's content that I love seeing. Some of you niggers are really talented.

>>18459114
Eh don't worry about it this thread saw worse, /nasfaq/, falseflagging trying to start ERP, chain of replies and what not. But I have to say this whole argument was retarded to begin with and the post that followed were just as retarded

>>18459327
If you know, you know. I didn't intend to be rude to anybody, I just think the aggie is a better alternative even if it is a bit more intensive. The global chat has problems, which I have listed. I don't want to bring those points up again. I like the aggie being up on weekends, it strikes a good balance between thread and off-thread that is entirely separated from the game. I don't want to see the aggie in its current form disappear at all. I will make no further arguments or dispute anything.
I don't erp, but thank you.
I think I need to go back to lying in bed. I'm sorry if I came off as angry or inconsiderate at any point here, I'm just very tired right now. Take care, /nasfaqg/. I love you all.
>>18459597
Looking back, I agree. It was retarded.

>>18456881
I do know that applies to me as well. A decent amount of features, fixes, and ideas have come from discussions where I/we tried to understand each others so the discussions would continue and mix their opinion with what I have in mind so we could understand each other more and for us to reach a conclusion that would be alright with us and be better for the game
I would say two of the people or avatarfags I remember being really great to talk to or have a discussion with are Konnui, and NenePro. They actually try to understand others' point while still giving their own idea unlike that one person, who I will not name who is the most egoistic person here, it's almost impossible to make your point across to that person, and it's still true till this day

The only difference back then is I know we're trying to have a proper discussion, my tone isn't like this, not mocking each others' post or point they're trying to make, with the exceptions of people shouting timeloop and armchair devs, people are more open to discussions, and is trying to reach something for the game, unlike now where it's just two sides of people defending something, for example, off-topic, and people wanting off-topic gone

>>18457275
I don't need to post any actual argument because all of the things I have said weren't even because of this current arguement. It's all from my experience of trying to discuss varying thread matters with you people
I'm mostly out of this topic anyway. I have already said what I think of this current matter in his first post, and I already know how this current matter will end. I merely cheered the "schizo" you people are calling after being in his position for a good amount of times

>>18460164
>unlike that one person, who I will not name who is the most egoistic person here, it's almost impossible to make your point across to that person, and it's still true till this day
You?

>>18459942
You don't owe me an apology.
Enough people like the aggie that I don't think it will disappear. DW about it.

>>18460334
Who knows? He's not named after all

>>18460433
>Voldemort is all the posters in /nasfaqg/

ohhhhhhhh dividends

>avatarniggers

>two of the main culprits behind shitting up the cosplay threads are nasfaq players
But why?

/nasfaq/

>>18460813
There were no women so I left.

>>18460813
he improved it, it's been downhill since then

>>18460897
No I mean, two different players admitted to being the ones who like to ruin those threads. The schizo ratio of the player base is too damn high.

>>18461052
Oh. I don't like ruining it, I like good cosplay.

/nasfaq/

>>18461078
Ah yes, the logic of "If I don't do it, somebody else will, so I might as well be the one who does it"
Very sound and very reasonable.

>>18461127
What?

>Ah yes I do exactly the thing that derails every cosplay thread, but I don't actually shit up the cosplay threads!
Disgraceful behaviour.

>>18461425

I miss avarice

>>18460164
"I have nothing to say about the current topic so I'll make a vapid, empty post vaguely relating to the topic without any concrete stance."
God, you really are the smartest, greatest player of all time. Consider this: if you don't have anything to say, maybe don't post.
You claim to be a thread veteran, but the way you're talking makes me feel like your only achievement in the game is your tenure, which is as good as that one janitor that gets a silver pen because he stayed with the company for 40 years.

>>18461474
fat

>>18461487
I liked his post though. It held information that I felt was useful or at the very least pleasant for me to know
>>18461496
yes, and that's hot

>I'm watching the global chat but I'm a giant poos so I'm being confrontational about it in the thread and shitting it up

>>18461543
Useful information such as?

>>18461543
>yes, and that's hot

>>18461562
You outright admitted to being part of the problem which leads to you posting cosplays here instead of there, the only thing global chat is good for is identifying that you're a habitual schizo.
Also global chat should be deleted.

>>18461760
What exactly did I openly admit to? Who am I?

>>18461736
>this post
>polka
heh.

>>18461798
If you're just twa then I don't see why you're even replying to me.
If you're Tampa or the other asshole then you should fuck off.

>>18461998
>Posting cosplay in the cosplay thread
>part of the problem
>>18452209
>>18452837
>>18452951
>>18459760
>>18460105
Faggot.

god she is so fucking flat I'm gonna cooooooooooooooooom
oh global chat good and bad your arguments suck

>>18461611
>He does know that what he preaches applies to himself.
>A lot of features/fixes/ideas have come from having had reasonable discussion.
Meaning that reasonable and fruitful discussion can happen, and he is capable of taking part in that. I suspected this already but its further confirmation.
>Konnui and Nenep are good arguers according to him.
>There is a person he claims is egotistical who he refuses to name for obvious reasons.
These points tell more about the anon in question than the people mentioned or left unmentioned. Not really useful but still nice to know.

All stuff that sheds new light to previous discussion(s), specifically to his posts in the last thread.

>>18462002
SMILES LOOKS LIKE THIS???

Are we posting cosplays?

>>18462023
Ok so you're not the guy, I don't see why you're defending him though.

>>18462216
Literal open acknowledgement of ban baiting

>>18462263
And you can't say this is off topic... it's in the "game".

>>18462216
>>18462263
>>18462301
Sounds based. Better than the men they're posting in there right now.

>>18462216
>>18462263
>>18462301

>>18462301
look mom I'm in this screenshot

>>18462062
Him shedding light on his previous vapid posts, sharing his opinions on three unrelated people out him disliking a person based on his opinion and liking two other people out of his opinion, he, him, he, him, his.
All that stuff relates to him and his masturbatory post. It adds and added nothing, and is the rhetorical equivalent of ejaculating into one's mouth and calling it productive.

>>18462263

Futa is gay.

>>18462579

>>18462627
cringe

>>18462378
Understanding the other is an integral part of having a fruitful argument, thus anything that sheds light on the other person, especially to the reasons behind their actions and why they hold the opinions they do is useful.
Without the willingness and effort to understand the context one the other persons opinions all argumentation devolves into what is essentially just two or more people shouting their opinions while refusing to hear what anyone else is saying, while getting frustrated over no one agreeing with them. That is madness. I do not like madness. I like conversation.

>>18462627
exquisite bush miss

>>18462579
tampa...

>bush is disgusting
low test

Why are you like this...

>>18462671
While what you say is reasonable on the surface, consider the context: that poster had no arguments. There was no discussion to be had. He literally stated outright that he no longer has to read or discuss anything because he 'knows better'. He basically blocked himself from any 'conversation' from the very start.
Also, I'm sorry that you have to try to pitifully defend yourself while trying to pose as another anon, it's very pathetic. Typing style is a dead giveaway here.

Hello. Mr Aggie schizo here, I approve the global chat.

>>18462378
Just read the posts and I don't get where you're getting at desu isn't the point of his post just telling us/(You) that he knows well what always happens when arguments happens here? I think that's why he's really way over his head and he knows it fully well that he's being high and mighty about it

>>18462827
Knowing that you're being arrogant while making five arrogant posts about effectively nothing doesn't make it have any more substance.

>>18462216
>>18462263
>>18462301
>>18462579

We're even getting global chat raids now. This community is truly eating itself.

Hello. Mrs Aggie schizo here, I don't approve the global chat.

>>18462963
I'm asking the judge for a divorce

>>18462963
>Mrs Aggie schizo
>Mrs
You do not exist

>>18462898
i don't really disagree with him since some of what he said held some truth but fair point about it being effectively nothing at the end

>>18462961

>>18462788
I believe the argument was something along the lines of "I do not like people dismissing arguments simply by calling the other person a schizo or any other similar catchall term." which is a reasonable argument to make.

Also, I'm sorry anon, but I'm not him. However, I am pleased to hear that my attempt at obfuscating my natural typing style has been a success.

so can we get a minecraft server now

>>18463108
He tries to argument this while saying that "it is futile to argument because the other side (not enlightened myself with LOTS of thread experience, hmhmhmmm) has underdeveloped brains and I already know that they will say nothing of value, so why bother".
Do you see, maybe, what undermines the point that you think he's trying to make, and why his posts are effectively about nothing but praise for himself?

>>18463196
Right after we make a Dota clan

>>18463206
He praised two other players and the anon who went to lie down, what do you mean?

>>18463196
No.
>>18463206
NTA, but I fear you're trying to force a square peg through a round hole. It was pretty obvious to most of us how far they had their head up their own ass from their very first post in the previous thread.

>>18463302
Fair. I won't post more on the matter if it were to serve no purpose. Sorry for making multiple posts about it, one would suffice.

>>18463206
If you think of his arguments from that point of view, yes. I try to give him the benefit of the doubt and try to read the posts as being from the perspective of someone who has already or is close to giving up precisely because people have refused to attempt to understand other people's, and his, arguments.
Less head up his own ass, more defeatism and hopelessness turned into frustration.

the e-cunt discord is laughing at you guys desu

>>18463431
who?

I want the gameplay discussion back... BBB... Triangle... Fandead... onegai...

>>18463431

the mitatsuko discord is laughing at you guys desu

>>18463446
no you will enjoy your endless circle of bickering that serves no purpose

>>18463468
You mean, the Miyazaki Discord?

the matsunomo discord is laughing at you guys desu

>>18463493
>>18463497
The Matsutake discord is not real.

Avarice fears this.

>>18463446
>Relying on specific users to generate gameplay-related discussion
This is exactly what I was talking about earlier. If you want gameplay to be discussed, bring something of value to the table to provoke the discussion.
If you want something, go take it. Don't wait for it to show up.

>>18463399
nt(hose)a but looking at it like that with his post here suddenly being a recollection of the past. it makes more sense and gives it a new light

>avarice left at the calm before the storm
how did he know i kneel

>>18463531
yes but what about the Mikasa discord?

With >>18463196 now I'm beginning to think someone is ina posting to try to put words into my mouth. I haven't ina posted since >>18455664 and barely posted anything about this topic.
t. priestess

>>18463654
We know.

>>18463654
It's most likey not just one person even

>haven't been selling Ayame since adjustment
I fucked up I bought her yesterday for this

>>18463729
NGMI

Hello, it is I, priestess, and as the one and only genuine article I want to announce my great passion for fishing. It is as a matter of fact so great that I decided to take a break from /nasfaqg/ so I can finally fish in peace in the cold North.
Thank you for your understanding and please stop trying to impersonate me.

>>18463764
If I just 10x sell for a bit, it's like I never even missed it

>>18463782
le fishe

This isn't even fun shitposting anymore, it's just sad.
>x killed the thread
The thread killed the thread.

THE THREAD IS DEAD
LONG LIVE THE THREAD

Imagine if honk also added niji coins

And to no one's surprise, the thread was fine until some lone retard decided he knows better than everyone and has to derail it with his complaints. Fucking despicable narcissistic behavior.

Who fucking cares. Just stop engaging.

>>18464085
Good idea, time to stop engaging with the thread and let it die

>>18464085
but I broke his shield come help instead we can win this

>>18464181
>Visual Noise Legends
I'm good. Maggie is fun though.

>>18464181
>hits the enemy once
>dies/gets downed
>"HES ONE HES ONE GOGOGOGOGOGO HES SO WEAK"
>almost full health enemy staring you down when you tried to rush a "weak" opponent
every single game, doesn't even matter which one.

the only thing you have to do is to say nigger and move on

>>18464135
I have been campaigning for that for a month now. If there is nothing to discuss let the thread die and don't bump it. Just make a new thread when adjustment happens.

>>18464334
nigger

>>18464334
nigger

>>18464334
nigger

>>18464334
yeah, I think I'm on your side now

NIGGER

After seeing threads like this I'm a bit upset that now that I have your attention, "Aroma" aroma is the word for the NYTimes wordle....

>>18464779
I'm going to murder you.

>>18464779
Love you

>>18464779
damn you

>>18464779
wordle?

>>18464809
>>18464886
These recent threads just seemed like the perfect time to slip in a bait post like that... Don't expect any in the future... Maybe...

>>18464921
There is no second chance.

After seeing threads like this I'm a bit upset that Good. You opened this message. This isn't actually Asari military command. They're busy tending to what's left of their planet. So you survived our fight on Thessia. You're not as weak as I thought. But never forget that your best wasn't good enough to stop me. Now an entire planet is dying because you lacked the strength to win. The legend of Shepard needs to be re-written. I hope I'm there for the last chapter. It ends with your death.-KL

8 minutes left

>>18461487
>>18463206
You are free to view my "argument" however you like, after all, I didn't deny anything in the last thread except at taking part in the discussion last thread.
But thank you for providing the thinking of "whoever disagrees with me are all just one schizo" here >>18462788. It should be already enough to provide the kind of people I was talking about last thread

>>18463108
Well, that was one way of viewing it, more so after being proven above.

>>18463399
I'm honestly surprised you came to that conclusion since I was trying not to give that kind of image. Though, it's Half-Half.
I'm still proud of my own experiences after trying varying discussions with the people in here but at the same time, I'm sad that the people that wanted the thread to be only about the game or the others that were pushing for it are gone or already have given up, and that it's almost impossible to get good discussions nowadays since the problem most of the time now are always either about circlejerk or having extreme case of off-topic posts here that aren't fun to read or is simply about them replying about trivia of themselves or what they did today and such, most of the time in spoilered texts, which you couldn't or shouldn't really complain about because of them guaranteed to back each other up and why you are a schizo for not wanting it or joining it.
I'm just waiting to see if our new influx of newfags will stay or will they die after a while.

>>18463654
Don't worry about that, that wasn't my intention at all, you could say I have just taken a liking to Ina the most after trying various ways to post or avatars to use

>>18463990
I wasn't the one that tried to push that I'm a narcissistic person that acts like I'm better than everyone in this thread, I already confirmed that I am one last thread

>>18465154
Why did you put this much effort into this instead of actually stating your concerns? There is no shortage of replies to you where you were asked what they were, in earnest, sarcastically, or both. A reply that was half or even a quarter of the length of this one, stating those concerns, would've made for discussion, opinion, whatever you want to call it, had you chosen to articulate it. Instead, you gave us more of this...

>>18465334
Well, because I have no concerns to state other than 3rd quote, which is like the everyday now, it isn't even my concern anymore honestly speaking.

what the fuck is everyone arguing about? I just woke up and now the thread is burning

>>18465444
>I'm sad that the people that wanted the thread to be only about the game or the others that were pushing for it are gone or already have given up,
This? I'm always sad when a longtime layer leaves. (You) can't govern 4chan.
>and that it's almost impossible to get good discussions nowadays
It isn't. >We had a good one going last thread about the game.
>since the problem most of the time now are always either about circlejerk or having extreme case of off-topic posts here that aren't fun to read or is simply about them replying about trivia of themselves or what they did today and such, most of the time in spoilered texts, which you couldn't or shouldn't really complain about because of them guaranteed to back each other up and why you are a schizo for not wanting it or joining it.
Look inward ;_;

>18465154
hello, please kill yourself, it will improve the thread a lot

>>18465689
how about YOU kill yourself, the ina poster is being super polite

>>18465739
being polite while shitting up the thread is still shitting up the thread

>>18465769
But it's politely shitting up the thread.

>>18465769
You fucks replaying to him with niggers and bait contribute WAY more to shitting up the thread than he ever did.
Fantastic that "disagreeing with the clique" is now considered shitting up the place

>>18465834

>>18465834
disagreeing on what? learn to fucking read, he doesn't even make a point other than 'me good, you bad' while killing off a fucking actual gameplay discussion last thread

>>18465834
>>18465911

Wow, the global chat is even more of a circlejerk than the aggie was.

>>18466071

>>18465582
We all do get sad when a longtime player leaves, but is it really just them we should be sad at? I will remember the players who left during the time we slowly turned into an ERP thread, and the players who I used to talk in-game ideas with.
I know I can't govern 4chan, it's this thread I'm trying to stay on-topic, or was trying.
I do agree with the good discussion we had at the last thread, which is why I was behaved until I felt the needed not to.

Sorry, but, I will consider other people's opinions or ideas, but circlejerk is something I wouldn't. Entering one also requires you to lose your own opinions to meld into the circle. I came here for the 4chan thread and game and only that.

>>18465689
Don't worry, endure for one more month and wait for the fes happening next month.

>>18463446
I'm with the other anon in this! I can't simply conjure gameplay discussions and posts out of thin air, last time it was thanks to Shikemura and his MIKO$ FUD.
If something else pops up I may replay, not like current thread is good for it anyways...

>>18466166
I stopped posting during ERPmania too.
The conversation was still ongoing. If you can't see that you derailed it, pretty effectively at that, becoming exactly what you claim to dislike, then I cannot help you.
>>18453582
>as always, be the change you want to see.

>>18466166
>endure for one more month
Don't actually kill yourself anon, fuck them and their circlejerk, they're as responsible as everyone else for the thread's quality but they won't accept responsibility. Even now they're just jerking each other off in the global chat as if it was a raid base instead of talking to you like a normal human being. They refuse to see any other world view than their own as having merit.

imma kill myself

>complains about off-topic posting
>Zhonk makes an actual in-game chat in an effort to divert all off-topic discussions out from the thread
>niggers are now complaining about the chat
like pottery.

>>18466166
>>18466318
This is all they do. Laugh and ignore. You don't jerk me off? then you're a schizo and a clown!

>>18465582
NTA but c'mon now, there was one good discussion going on surrounded by a colossal amount of shit
Not saying that it invalidates the good discussion but when everything else besides that is a hot piece of garbage it feels downright bad

>>18466505
Anon, who's going to help Sui-chan carry this watamelon without you around?

>>18466212
Hmm, alright then. I suppose I will try with something - from your posts, I gather that you have looked at the historical market data. I am unsure how far back you have looked, or whether you were here during it, but recently there seems to be less days where a 'Susan' happens, to one coin or most of the market. It used to be a semi-common occurrence, especially for some coins (Mori), but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. Rarely does a coin get 0 views based purely off API input, and the data between POI and Nasfaq seems to be fairly consistent lately.

Is it purely due to changes on Youtube's end? How do does that the lack of 'purely red' days affects the market and player mentality?

>offtopic le bad when it isn't our our clique shitting up the thread

>>18466310
I derail thread with the purpose of making you people stop going off-topic, which would sound ironic or hypocritical, but I can proudly say that it does work and it stops everyone from posting until one tries to re-rail it, which I do stop posting.

>>18466318
It's okay, anon. I won't actually kill myself. I'll just simply quit for good and for the thread quality to be forever better, well, according to them, and what can I say, that's what entering to a circlejerk does. You and your group can't be wrong, it's the others' or in this case, the schizo's fault. They most likely think the off-topic in here is the norm now, which is honestly hard to deny now.

>>18466570
waaah everyone i disagree with is (((them)))! (((they))) are one clique!! my group (not them) is good they baad!!!

>>18466535

>>18466566
Fine!

>>18466568
Who cares. But what are your thoughts on futa?

>>18466666
Quints stolen on a falseflag about futa... I'm about to cry.

>>18466666
wew

futafags kys

>>18466166
...I just wrote two paragraphs about why you shouldn't commit suicide. Holy fuck, I'm glad I didn't post that. If you do go, just know I'll miss you.

Stop engaging the thread. Leave it alone. They will tire out soon.

Patience exhausted, limiters removed.
>>18466592
>which would sound ironic or hypocritical
Because it fucking is you bombastically egotistical nudnik.
>but I can proudly say that it does work
This is working? This looks like a fucking on-topic thread to you? This is what you want the general to be?
>stops everyone from posting until one tries to re-rail it, which I do stop posting.
"My way or the highway" - so the thread has to bend to YOUR whim, or exhaust itself at dealing with your derailment? Fuck you, you arrogant prick.
>I'll just simply quit for good and for the thread quality to be forever better, well, according to them
It will. Do you know what's worse than a circlejerk? A deluded, one man, circlejerk.

>>18466799
>A deluded, one man, circlejerk.
a masturbatorium, if you will

>>18466832

The inaposter is literally mentally ill, stop replying to him retards

This is what we call taste of your own medicine.

>>18466592
Don't leave at least, don't leave just because of them This is 4chan, they have do deal with you just like you have to deal with them and it's the beauty of it. If everyone dissenting to the circlejerk leaves, this thread will truly be dead. If they're not happy with this not being a hugbox, then they can go make their own hugbox elsewhere.
I don't even fully agree with you for the record, but I think they're being the worst person right now.

a network, im surprised that the script is still working

>>18466936
that guy 10xing Ame

>>18466936
When the thread needed him the most, he returned.

>>18466936
Our saviour! I sold! I have no regrets!!! Sleghardt you fucking madman, I kneel

A deadbeat just posted an on topic post but everyone is just ignoring it and not replying. You all retards would rather argue over each other than get back on topic. "be the change you want to be" my ass.

>>18467040
gonna cry? shut the fuck up pissbaby

>>18467040
Here's the bitter truth: it never was about the thread. These people do not care about it, or the game. Those posts exist to complain about a 'clique' (read: people I do not like) that exists in their minds, that they view as the source of all that is evil, while the real culprit were themselves all along.

the only problem I have in the thread is the faggot who constantly posts vshojoshit. Whoever you are, kill yourself

>>18466712
Thanks anon, it makes me really happy

>>18466799
I know it is hypocritical. The only reason why this isn't working right now is because I'm actually trying to respond to you people, which is something I don't do normally when trying to derail it with the purpose of trying to re-rail it.
I'm not saying it shouldn't bend MY way. I'm saying it should have on-topic posts. But if you consider me the only one that wants on-topic posts here, then it might as well be my way

I'm glad that me leaving will make the thread better, then. If so, it will make the thing I've been trying to do for months come true. Nothing more better than I could ask for honestly

>>18466930
Sorry, but this is really becoming tiring, it should be the same for them, they're most likely also tired of trying to prove why I'm wrong and why off-topic is allowed. Like I said, I came here for both the game and the thread, if I'm leaving one, I'll leave both. Besides, it had been a pretty fun time already and would be close at being one year here at nasfaq.
Don't worry, I'm used to it, that's just their attitude most of the time someone does mention the usual circlejerk. One of them is the non named person I have mentioned on my very first post, so I'm used to not making any sense to them.

>>18467155
forgot your ina image faggot

>>18466936
Thanks for this, have a nice day. I'll stop now.

I don't know what circlejerk you're talking about

>>18467183
>One of them is the non named person I have mentioned on my very first post, so I'm used to not making any sense to them.
Don't tiptoe around it, tell us.

>>18467234
You leaving the thread now and never coming back would make the thread much better, you can do it now in fact. Nothing's stopping you, I won't hugbox you into thinking I want you here.

>>18466592
as someone who spent a lot of effort trying to understand you and mediate the argument while also being someone that is arguably a part of the "circlejerk" as you call it, it saddens me that despite claiming that you realize that >>18456456 applies to you as well, you still continue to demonize the "circlejerk" just like the "circlejerk" demonizes you. Here your use of "circlejerk" or "clique" is no different from the other anons use of "schizo", just another way to dismiss an argument or a point.

This is the last post I'll be making on this topic. I hope you find some sort of happiness in life, even if it isn't here in this thread with >us.

>>18467337
My bet is on tampa, he's been an egotistical nuisance since the day he joined, and right now is the one shitposting the most

>>18467450

heya im clocking in for my schizoshift

>>18467482
I know, you're the only one to use that image

arguments like these would only leave a sour taste on everyone. I wouldn't be surprised if it kills both the thread and the chat because everyone's going to be scared in using both mediums. Why does someone have to be such a sperg about it? I'm actually considering not posting anymore because it might ruin someone's mood and I won't be surprised if others would think the same thing, especially the newfriends

>>18467512
>>18467482
also, >had to show it's him
Thanks for proving my point

>>18466568
I should've not made that post while I'm in the middle of cooking my dinner/tomorrow's lunch ;-;
Out of the magical sands in my head I'd say that, whether they are doing it consciously or not, it makes people value dips more and creates a sense of missing out if you don't buy in early, for a recent example of this you have NOEL$ yesterday, who was a good deal at market opening event at x5! Yet was bought up to a price where you could sell x2 and make good money, all that in a just a single day!
Sadly I do not keep prints of historical data in my kitchen so I'll have to get to you back later with actual numbers.

>>18467566
The chatschizo has been almost exclusively screenshotting me deliberately giving them bait for that shit for this entire thread. I'd argue you've proven mine.

>>18467647
the chatschizo you were talking about wasnt even being serious probably just making fun of those pointing why its bad

>>18467795
even better

>>18467795
I was perfectly serious

>>18467824
Then you're not very bright.

>>18466568
I hadn't actually noticed this before you mentioned it, but yeah, what you are saying seems to be true.
I'm a retard when it comes to tech so any guess is better than mine on your first question.
As for your second question, I do feel like the lack of purely red days does affect the general market mentality, especially among the richer players. Unless the richer players are willing to give up on trading, the lack of red days forces them to buy worse Divs ROI% coins, sometimes even those that are at or above their average prices. This likely explains why a lot of the richer players were buying Holocoin last week. Despite the coin being up, it was still one of the best Divs ROI% coins available. I recall a Rushia poster was wondering about this back then.
This likely also drives coin prices up, contributing to the coin value inflation, and dividend ROI% deflation.

I'm very interested in hearing your and other folks' opinions on this.

>>18466985
He has sovl, he is just like the kenzokus

>>18466568
>>18467897
Hasn't it been weeks since the last Susan day? The only time coins end up with "huge" downwards adjustments that would be anything even close to a Susan day is when the "average" skews so hard in one direction that it skews enough away from them to make a -100k dip seem gigantic gigantic. or VOD deletion

>>18467897
I've always been saying that we need harsher red days but Zhonk never delivers for some reason and some people are lobbying against it (probably the richfags themselves). We literally need 500% drops to fuck over the bagholders and force everyone to trade

>>18468063
Sure lemme just trade my 30k coin stack real quick. How would that work?

>>18468180
>what is shorting

>>18468200
My body is ready.

>>18468035
I'm pretty sure he's talking more about the improper counting of views that happens with channels like Mori, as for a period of time, she wasn't participating in the Brap cycle and was surprisingly stable without any of those true Susan days. My rrat on this has long been the fact it's due to how CCV tracking was done, as during the huge fiesta about CCV, I'm pretty sure (might be wrong) that Mori wasn't fluctuating as hard, but since they've started to fix that CCV bug (or at least attempt to), Mori's braps have returned.
The general disappearance of Susaning across the board is likely API changes and honk's supposed new scraper, so I do agree with your general point though.

>>18465154
>Don't worry about that, that wasn't my intention at all, you could say I have just taken a liking to Ina the most after trying various ways to post or avatars to use
ok no problem then, my quoted post must have been someone trying to flame then. Ina is indeed very nice!

>>18468290
CCV has nothing at all to do with the views counted after a stream ends. Unless there was an independent change to how "views" are counted on VODs. Mori hasn't had a "real" brap cycle since the scraper change months ago. These are minibraps. Little toots.

>>18468063
All a harsher red day does is help dividend players since then they can accumulate more and for cheaper. I fail to see how this would negatively affect any of the richhags over since a majority of them rely ~60-90% on dividend income.

If you want the game to be more competitive, you'd need to either nerf the dividends or let the coin value inflation continue onwards until the Divs ROI% falls even lower. This would make a trading heavy playstyle more viable in the higher ranks, which I'm biased towards for obvious reasons.

Consider heavier green days instead.

>>18468063
The last time we had this conversation to any serious degree, Susanings were more common, and the daily trading cap was much lower and more punishing.

>>18468180
You can move 1440 shares per coin per day. It adds up.

>>18468376
No, I'm not saying that CCV changes the view counts on videos, I'm saying that during that fiasco with CCV being misinterpreted and showing significantly lower numbers than actuality, there was a backend change that helped fixed Mori's braps temporarily, but as they've tried to fix it, they've returned (but I haven't done numbers to prove this). The old school multi day 0 view days for Mori are long gone which I'm assuming you're talking about being "real", which can likely be attributed to just API changes and scraping changes on nasfaq and YT's end, but even recently there's been significant braps, I remember it even dropping to 11k recently, but nothing on the level of old school braps of multiple 0 days.

Sigh. I guess I'll never be able to join the discord
or minecraft clique despite being here for so long...

>>18468601
Yeah, the multiple 0 days being fixed was the scraper-side changes (all NASFAQ, not YouTube related). That was the "original" brap cycle. Wasn't 11k the views from Q falling off? or a subtick or something?

Grug not smart enough know how other YouTube CCV changes work.

>>18468672
I'm starting to think there isn't a minecraft clique at all...

>>18468672
ayo lemme suck dem toes

>>18468672
There is no discord.
There is no minecraft clique.
It's all in your head.

>>18468445
Is there a better way to account for dividends? I think the volume of coins should matter since it's supposed to be excesses distributed to all players. Higher volume should negatively affect divvies

>>18468778
Dead man walking.

>>18468672

>>18468687
Q was released on the 3rd, and the 11k was on the 11th (funny). That day at least on nasfaq just has an 80k viewish day, with no daily subscribers or weekly subscribers changed from the previous and weekly views were even up on that day. There is an 0 view day saved in the history as well which was down to 12k on the 6th
It was more of a rrat that I've long thought of since Mori started fluctuating like this again, CCV is funny magic numbers in the first place.

>>18468927
>the fed is evolving

>>18468709
>>18468765
>>18468927
It's okay! I've already started writing down names of every potential discord/clique fags ruining everything

>>18469141
It's all so tiresome.

I love fucking money, bros.

>>18468778
>Higher volume should negatively affect divvies
Nice try, Devchama. Don't think I forgot last time that was suggested.

>>18469300
I fucking love money bros

Damn. I just woke up and missed all the fun stuff

>>18469308
nacho!!!!?????!?!?!!!?!?!?!

>>18469374
You missed nothing.

>>18469374
I just woke up and there's no game discussion. I want to discuss how to groom my wallet, not how to groom the thread.

>>18469468
post wallet

>>18469552

>>18469141
cool! I hope I end up in that list, schizochama

I get the guy concerns about the global chat killing the thread/aggie because convenience, but at the same time, as a guy who uses the GC, my thread opened too. Honk will never shut down the global chat though so it's a moot point in the beginning. We need it for options cuz it's p2p

>>18469628
My whole beef with the argument is that the core seems to be
>I can't run 2 tabs at once
>I can't have 2 conversations at once
Which means whoever is suggesting it either doesn't understand the game or doesn't have enough of a developed brain to be playing this game effectively anyway. In both cases, the argument is pointless and should be ignored. The thread and the GC aren't going away.

>>18469141
>it was the fucking guranigger who's being schizophrenic all this time

>>18469628
invite to the Group Chat when?

>>18469628
Inaposter and the guy concerning the globalchat are two diff people I think. i don't think the one posting ina minds it since he mentioned wanting to see newfags stay or leave and the offtopic posts tho i might be wrong

>>18469799

>>18469790
You are trivializing this greatly, please consider shutting the fuck up before you ignite the argument again.

>>18469790
based

>>18469790
How the FUCK does your two quotes have anything with his ability to play the game?

Can you guys talk about your group chat stuff in your own private chat? Thx

>>18469790
Well let me just presuppose my point of view first by stating that I don't care about the thread for thread sake, I only see this as a medium of communication with other players, as long as players still plays the game even though the thread completely dies off then it's cool for me.

But at the same time, that guys got some truth in him, he should have mention it desu, for example, every time the Aggie re-awakens, thread is dead 100%. Nobody can deny that so I can see the fear of the same thing happening here now that GC is here.

Also fuck the discordniggers laughing at the debacle. I rather have this kind of convo than have a safespace in discord where every dissents are just banned. Friends argue, strangers just stay silent and leave.

/nasfaqg/

>>18470124
Aggie opens at the point of the week where there's nothing to discuss anyway. Friday is the most boring day of the week because nobody sells and everyone's just hanging around waiting for dividends. One of the points of the aggie was arguably to GIVE something to do when the thread would be dead anyway. This association of "Aggie opened = Dead thread" is a presumption ignoring the rest of the scenario's details.
The fact that the thread and the GC have both had no problem staying active since the GC was opened should tell you that this argument is incredibly flawed on its premise, and is missing (or ignoring) key information that influences the situation.

>>18470124
>Nobody can deny that
Nobody can, or has been ever able to prove that. And more than one Anon has proven the opposite - that it has no effect.
The thread's died with the aggie opened and the aggie closed. The global chat has been open for days now and the thread is fine. The "conversation" is proof positive that the drama is self-manufactured, a self-fulfilling prophecy, intentional shitposting, or all of the above.

I'm going to groom Applause.

>>18471340
oi

>>18467618
Good luck, I'm back from cooking reps myself, spoilered for people who don't wish to read about that.
I suppose it might impact the dip FOMO a bit, but consider another angle of this: back in the day, you were never really confident in how much liquid you 'should' have to zero yourself before dividends. There were genuine liquidity crises from 2 red days back-to-back, or a strong Susan at the end of the week. These events made the market less predictable, and now people have gotten a bit more comfortable with spending money more steadily rather than anticipating the unexpected.
With the current multicoin update (with a hidden volatility update I think, but I have not tested it, just by observing the market movement), the dips/spikes actually disappear over the course of the day. In the December-January period, the volatility was low enough for a dip to last the entire day, usually, which made a lot of people complacent and made the task of trying to estimate how much you have to spend per day trivial.
>>18468035
You are correct. It's been a very long time since a proper Susan, it's almost always VOD deletions/privates, or some more exotic events involving view rolloffs or returns from hiatuses. These, however, can be predicted. Susans were completely random.
>>18467897
About the effects of this on the market - I have a suspicion that adjustments are in some way, shape, or form based around the previous day's closing price (which would make sense, since mechanics like Oversold/Overbought would take the closing price into consideration), which would mean that events such as a Susan would be able to perhaps affect the price of coins in the longer term. I know I have jinxed it before, but Mori's price was primarily driven down by the OG brap cycle from which she usually didn't recover in full. Susans effectively injected unpredictability and variation to the market, and I think that they just made the game a bit more fun, strange as it may be.
>>18468063
Red days benefit those who can buy into them in full, i.e. the people you would wish to target. It's the green days (as >>18468445 said) that you need to buff in order to encourage trading.
A person who buys a coin on a red day will 'profit' off its return to the average price.
A person who doesn't sell on a green day will not turn a profit at all, since the value of the coin will return back down in time.
This is why "Ain't selling" was and is the most devastating FUD this thread has created.
>>18468290
I was talking about both. Old-time Mori was insane, as a coin. Now she's mostly predictable. That being said, me saying this might be a red flag for honk's scraper.
>>18468601
CCV chances/issues had no real impact on VOD views as far as I could tell. Mori's recent fluctuations come from her erratic streaming schedule, music releases, and some aftershock-like effects of view rollouts. 11k was indeed due to Q rolling off.
>>18468778
A bit of a timeloop, but you might not have been here when it was suggested: this would make dividends same-y as players would equilibrate with the coin volumes towards the 'untapped' coins. Volume changes much slower than daily VOD views (and cannot be kept in check by daily adjustments) so it would effectively just drive every single coin toward the same returns/price and kill of the entire strategic aspect of gearing your wallet for the long term.

>>18471394
(You) quit, faggot. Applause is free game now.

>>18471340
I'll call the money cops

>>18471520
The cops won't stop my large schemes.

>>18471473
the only free game you should be concerning yourself with is Destiny 2, a free to play online MMO FPS Looter Shooter with PvE, PvP, and so much more!

>>18471579
ohhhhh yandere joe

I am going to groom Applause while Joe watches.

aight let's check the all-chat people are complaining about it can't be that ba-
>lemme just cut my hand off I am deeply depressed and sleep forever
not surprised at all, but still time to close the internet.

>>18471873
>the person saying that is on Page 5 of the leaderboard

>>18471939
nonono you don't understand he's a part of the forbidden social clique the integral part of the hugbox because of him you cannot state your opinion in the threads

>>18471974
You and your kind have been a detriment to this thread

>>18471432
>CCV chances/issues had no real impact on VOD views as far as I could tell.
My statements were founded on the rrat I had in my head of those CCV issues "fixing" Mori's number fluctuations at least for the API outside of her normal schedule debauchery, as I didn't recall many massive drops during that CCV arc, though you do know Mori's fuckery likely way more than I do, so I might just be deluding myself.

>>18471995
But I'm Ț̸̿h̴̕͜e̴̞̚ ̷̨͋V̶͕̚ơ̶̯i̶̚͜d̶̖̉...

>>18471995
The guy who you're calling a 'detriment' isn't even a tako, he said himself that he's merely using Ina as an avatar

>>18472063
Exactly

>>18472063
You could call him... an 'Ina'postor.

>>18472102
Take your (You), I chuckled.

>>18472063
be real, there's enough dumbass takos out there, just like there's rotten fruit on every single oshiboard except the absolutely dead ones

>>18472095
So what are you trying to say?
>>18472102
Eyyyyyyyyyyy pic related

I'm going to groom smiles.

>>18471340
>>18471473
She just came out of the shower too, prime for harvesting

>>18472063
So he is an avatarfag?

>>18472301
>avarice quit to go find a bigger cock

>>18472353
Ms. L...

19th hour, enjoy, etc.

WELCOME -- TO HOUR NINETEEN
HOUR NINETEEN...
THE... NINETEENTH HOUR
IT'S NOT THE SEVENTEENTH HOUR
IT'S NOT THE... NINTH HOUR
IT'S HOUR NINETEEN
ONE... NINE...
A VERY... SPECIAL HOUR
IN THAT, HOUR NINETEEN, IS THE NINETEENTH HOUR, NOT... ANY OTHER HOUR
VERY FEW HOURS CAN CLAIM TO BE THE NINETEENTH HOUR
THIS HOUR... IS ONE OF THOSE HOURS
AND AS WE SIT HERE, ENJOYING THIS HOUR, THE NINETEENTH HOUR, LET'S SPARE A MOMENT, TO THINK OF THOSE HOURS THAT AREN'T QUITE THE NINETEENTH HOUR
HOUR EIGHTEEN... AND HOUR TWENTY

WELCOME TO THE NINETEENTH HOUR!

>>18473098
cringe
>>18473100
based

>>18471432
the problem is that it only incentivizes people to hold because coins keep increasing and never drops down. if coins increase up exponentially, there should also be a drastic drop

>>18473098
>18:59:59

>>18473100
>19:00:00

Like a bolt from the blue, it's time for the Numbers Review.
Data collected at Cycle 60.

Here's the R.I.C.H. report for today:
>Total Shares in circulation amount to 13,940,398, a 0.71% increase from yesterday's volume
>Average shares per coin is 224,845. There are 27 coins above this average.
>Calliope currently has the highest volume, at 1,031,428 shares, or 7.4% of market volume.
>Civia currently has the lowest volume, at 33,544 shares, or 0.24% of market volume.

Top 5 Volume Increases (of 46):
>Matsuri :: +7.7%
>Nana & Roboco :: +6%
>Lamy :: +4.1%
>AZKi :: +3.4%
>Fauna :: +3.3%

Top 5 Volume Decreases (of 16):
>Choco :: -5.2%
>Ayame :: -4.4%
>Laplus :: -3.6%
>Kanata :: -2%
>Kiara :: -1.8%

1 coin (Okayu) had a net 0% change in volume today.
23 other coins had a sub-1% change in volume today.


Here's the R.I.S.E. report for today:
>Starting Liquid is estimated at $166,413.60, which is an increase of 1.76% from yesterday's estimate.
>Total Market Value for today is $298,848,082,691.25, which is an increase of 1.92% from yesterday's Market Value.
>Average Value per Share is $21,437.56. A total of 16 coins are above this average.
>Calliope currently has the highest value, at $34,030,275,318.08 in total market value, or 11.39% of market value.
>Nana currently has the lowest value, at $207,238,268.59 in total market value, or 0.07% of market value.

Top 5 Value Gains (of 37):
>Marine :: +37.2%
>Ayame :: +34.5%
>Kiara :: +26.3%
>Kanata :: +22.1%
>Noel :: +20.9%

Top 5 Value Losses (of 25):
>Hololive :: -20.4%
>Mumei :: -17.1%
>Laplus :: -14.2%
>Ayamy :: -13.7%
>Towa :: -13%

18 coins (Iofi, Reine, Rushia, AZKi, Melfissa, Pochimaru, IRyS, Coco, Civia, Risu, Koyori, HLuna, Lamy, Subaru, Shion, Ui, Lui, Roboco) had a sub-4% change in value today.


Here's the F.R.E.E. report for today:
>Today's Superchats totaled to $172,495,706, which is a decrease of 53.87% from yesterday's Superchats.
>The Broker made $259,809,696.14 today, an increase of 18.90% from yesterday's salary.

Top 5 Superchat Increases (of 26):
>Miko :: +8.3%
>Moona :: +4.8%
>Baelz :: +4.2%
>Sora :: +4%
>Calliope :: +3.4%


Here's the M.O.V.E. Report for today:
>3 coins (Civia, Botan, Moona) adjusted green, but are still trending upwards.
>8 coins (Suisei, Nene, Koyori, Mel, Melfissa, Aqua, Nabi, Kronii) adjusted red, but are now above their pre-adjustment value.
>1 coin (Laplus) adjusted green, but is now below their pre-adjustment value.
>50 coins are on projected trend lines and have not intersected with their pre-adjustment values.

Top 5 Most Volatile Coins (per Hour Average):
>Matsuri :: $454.30 Up
>Marine :: $424.91 Down
>Lamy :: $413.57 Up
>Ayame :: $388.60 Down
>Choco :: $381.42 Down

Top 5 Least Volatile Coins (per Hour Average):
>Sana :: $3.05 Down
>Botan :: $4.24 Up
>Civia :: $4.33 Up
>Melfissa :: $9.17 Up
>Pochimaru :: $9.34 Up

Overall Average movement was $29.76 per hour.
Average Upwards movement was $102.28 per hour.
Average Downwards movement was -$134.37 per hour.

The Financial Underwriters of Comprhensive Knowledge would like to remind you to stay informed, shitpost responsibly, and FUD accurately.

>>18474122
thank you <3

>>18474122
>despite adjusting up, Mori now has 1,031,428 shares
>>18411568
>when yesterday (according to that post) Mori had 1,028,000
I guess 3 retards buying x10 all day really do make a difference

>>18467618
>who was a good deal at market opening event at x5! Yet was bought up to a price where you could sell x2
Thanks for doing the math or not i just needed someone else to think for me I've been wondering if this was a possible play for a while now. Although its bad when making stacks for divs, its a great way to squeeze some trading profits if you don't expect a spike

>>18474321
Two of those people buying 10x do that solely because a single player decided that losing an approximate ~120 million in taxation and buying overpriced coins is a smart business decision, not even out of oshicoining. And people will still praise him for it and for how smart it is.

>>18474490
he's a deadbeat

>>18474490

>>18471432
>This is why "Ain't selling" was and is the most devastating FUD this thread has created.
As the person responsible for coining it as the "Ain't Sellin'" meta and drawing attention to it, I feel I should point out that holding for dividends was, at the time, considered the most viable tactic. The gains from selling a coin were considered to be lower than the losses you would incur from selling and buying back in later. Reds were NOT strong, usually quite weaker than greens (which weren't that great to begin with), and volatility was low so the market frequently stagnated. Compound that with how you could only move 144 shares per coin in a day, and selling became significantly more trouble than it was worth. Hence, the "Ain't Sellin'" meta was born.
Was that the optimal way to play? Probably not, honestly. But daytrading required a lot more specialized and focused autism due to how small your gains would be and how much you had to micromanage to keep them from becoming losses. "Ain't Sellin'" was the truth of that era of the game. And the truth is the strongest FUD.

>>18474490
nice fud

>>18474490
I don't think anybody is "praising" cypher's thinkpad for being retarded. It is an amusing sideshow.

I'm probably going to need this tomorrow so I might as well.

>>18475065
You better not hit us with the >sleep 35.ogg

>>18475278
Considering how early I woke up today...I can make no guarantees. I'll set an extra alarm just for that image.

>>18475313
Aye' don't want to see a brother fall prey to the thinkpad

>>18475405
I never knew how badly I needed skeletons in pirate hats in my life.
>>18475382
>>18475382
>>18475382
new bread, migrate when ready