/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Coco is still the cutest Holo

>carefree shitposters who make autists butthurt
Hmm...

>>1103372
i mean ive heard many people talk about how they hated orange when i was growing up as a color and Mexican restaurants that use garish greens and oranges are eyesores maybe its just one of those things that orange is a controversial color

https://youtu.be/Y02RJO7Y4g4?t=32
Extremely relevant.

I like orange most likely soley because of HRM Princess Garnet Til Alexandeos XVII

>>1103469
huh

...the color of my loyalty.

No SOUL

>>1103372
Top left - No soul
Top right - SOVL
Bottom left - No soul
Bottom right - SOVL

Is that.... Is that ORANGE???

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRRRRGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>1103372
I just realized that Coco is the top SC earner for youtube, Kiara is for EN, and the other two have a lot of money as well, maybe we could learn from them

>>1103431
for me it really depends on the shade of orange and what colors it is mixed with. Like, the orange in Kiara's hair and the colors its highlighted with look great. The orange and blue on her outfit on the other hand look awful to me. Coco's looks great all around.

>>1103372
You forget Suityan orange leggins in her new design, I remember the chaos in hlg

>>1103754
Kiara isn't the true top earner tho.
It's about loyalty anyway, not money.

>>1104209
God I fucking hate orange-blue contrast

>>1103372
Suico....

Annoying Orange isn't a VTuber.

>>1104560
He is virtual and he is on Youtube.

>>1103372
You missed the orange homo and Nene

>>1104209
What feels off about her new design is that other than the leggings there's very little orange on the top to pull it together. Lots of blues/greens and them BAM Orange.

>>1104560
>ignores Trump
Bruh

>>1104712
That would make every channel on youtube (and only youtube) a VTuber, you don't understand the definition.
>>1104764
No one is pushing Trump as on-topic.

>>1104774
Theres a reason AO threads don't get deleted.

>>1104832
Because the mods are extremely liberal, correct. Mods also allow blogposting on /sp/ and e-celebs on /v/, neither of which are on-topic either. Thanks for outing yourself as a wojak posting newfag as well, surprises absolutely no one.

>>1104865
>knowing what /sp/ and /v/ are like
Done.

>>1104877
You can visit their catalog once and observe this in seconds. Feel free to try and save face by diverting the topic, you can't defend anything you said.

>>1104902
>I-I-I just coincidentally visit their catalog, y-yeah that's how I know!
Nice damage control.

>>1104930
Strawman quotes aren't a defense, electionfag. Back anything you said up.

>>1104939
It's not a strawman, it's what you said. Not my fault your damage control sound so pathetic that you are now scrambling to find a way to cope.

>>1104984
That is a strawman, making up a quote no one typed and then attributing it to your opposition because you think it's easier to try to rebut than what I actually typed is the dictionary definition of a strawman.
>cope
This is twitterspeak, you are a bonified electionfag.

>>1104832
They do, the board got cleaned you only have 1 containment thread now

>>1105019
That is not the definition of a strawman. You do not know what a strawman is. You are not smart. You also admitted to browsing /sp/ and /v/ and are damage controlling hard over this.

>>1105070
It is the definition, it's you who doesn't know what it means. Nor do you know what damage control means, despite trying to weasel out of defending your non-existent point by moving the goalpost.

>>1105104
>literally NO U
Next.

>>1105126
Another strawman quote, you're retarded.

>>1105150
>argument by repetition
Why do I keep winning?

>>1105164
You aren't arguing or winning, at least you got the repetition part right, though you shouldn't be proud of being a dog incoherently yapping all day.

>>1103372
I unironically like the bottom half. Fite me.

>>1105212
Uhhhhhh, based??

>>1105193
Your ignorance over the definitions of fallacies are proof that you are unqualified to engage in debate. Furthermore, after your embarrassing error was pointed out, you decided to double down on your idiocy, engaging in the invincible ignorance fallacy. Engaging in IIF is equivalent to refusal to argue, therefore you gave up and knelt before me. You could not refute anything I said. I won. You lost.

>>1105212
Right Side > Left Side for me.

>>1105253
You don't understand what a strawman is, you don't understand what an example is, you couldn't defend a single stance you had, and you resorted to wojak posting. So in lieu of the fact you're wrong about everything, you've actually lost here.

>>1103372
>It’s no surprise that such a powerful color inspires negative associations as well.Orange can be strident and exhausting if it’s overused. Too much orange is overpowering, and a large number of people consider orange their least favorite color. We associate orange with danger, and its attention-getting properties means most designers use it sparingly.

Screencapped for posterity.

>>1105280
Isn't it always.

>>1105212
He may not be president anymore but Trump is still the strongest chuuba.