[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.18821170 [View]
File: 278 KB, 1048x1180, maptism_claims.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18821170

Now that Hoshimiya has declared that they are unwilling to negotiate for the disputed land, I am instead making a direct request to the Nuetralfag with multiple reasons on the rightfulness of /who/'s claim.
Arguments to support /who/'s claim over the coastline strip.
1. Hoshimiya was given the lighthouse island they asked for in their waters directly assaulting /who/'s strategic trade integrity, to mantain order and a stable status quo, the coastline strip is key.
2. Hoshimiya holds an inmense land border with /who/, such a land border would be difficult to administer and protect by Hoshimiya, in light of the situation, /who/'s bureaucracy is simply much more fit to administer the coastline strip.
3. Hoshimiya already holds an inmense coastline in addition to their close relations with /miko/, to take over the strip of land is overkill.

If /who/'s request is accomplished, we are willing to lend the ports to Hoshimiya for their naval ambitions in exchange of an alliance, /who/ will use their own naval force to assist that of Hoshimiya in times of crisis or if the need comes.

I hope we can all come to a satisfactory resolution.

>> No.18819314 [View]
File: 278 KB, 1048x1180, maptism_claims.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18819314

Yo, currently I'm trying to get this particular strip of land for /who/, however, Hoshimiya has declared that they are unwilling to negotiate for it, so instead i'll simply take it up to higher authorities and try to convince the /vtwbg/ tripfag, I'd like it if you could help me come up with a strong argument for it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]