/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>28582770
>But during that period of time, her gameplay streams were getting between 600 and 800 viewers.
That's the thing, it wouldn't make a difference. She could be 2 views on her game streams, 2 CCV on her ASMR, the great majority of the revenue that got disclose come from the VOD viewers catching her ASMR live.

There is no correlation in this case between her general stream CCV and her VOD revenue because it is lopsided by the repeat value of her ASMR, and lack of repeat value of her regular streams.

Fauna, as >>28582757 mentioned, is banking on that too because even if her CCV is not the highest, the sheer repeat value of her ASMR
>pic related
ensures a very good and recurring revenue coming from VOD watchers.

It's a good strategy and there are entire companies of ASMR chuubas that do nothing but one ASMR a week, nothing but that.

It is not possible to extrapolate from the ratio between the median of peak CCV or the true average CCV or any live viewership measurement for an ASMR chuuba and her disclosed revenue unless you are comparing a similar ASMR chuuba