/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>25630618
>>25630669
>Chloe could have actually-
No, she would not have. Her first stream dropped 90k CCV from her Debut even with singing buff, and her zatsudan actually filtered people unlike Salome. If Salome's EoP pandering stream doesn't have red across the board for viewer retension you can basically guarantee her views are fucking fake

>>25595863
What the fuck are you talking about. Her retention is garbage, over 40% of her audience has never watched her previous streams before.

We've compared her to other JP streamers, you want to dismiss this data as bad because it's an established streamer. We then show you data from debut streams, with comparisons across multiple talents, you say it's not fair because the numbers on stream length aren't close enough and they aren't in the same company. We show you the numbers of people in the same company, with the same length of stream, and you end up fucking ignoring it completely.

You're so far off base it's not even funny. Use real data, it concussively proves that Salome has fucked up numbers.

>>25483502
In order for this general to have any meaning at all, we have to assume the numbers have something of value to extract.

>>25483520
To expand on this, it's not THAT weird, this is Chloe's first few streams with the same chart for comparison. The thing that stands out the most is honestly the fact that Chloe has way more unique chatters proportionally to her CCV.

I don't actually buy the rrats on salami, just look at this graph of Chloe which uses the same metrics for her first few streams, it looks the same as salamis

chloe debut chart
solo streams only. also missing the unarchived english singing
you can see that the morning zatsus are retention filter