/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>38882640
You mean bad. All she had to do was make a more older looking panda and people wouldn't have made a huge fuss about it.

Just so sad how vtubers do this thinking they will now get clipped. It's the clipfags at fault for all this. Shizukou was decent enough as the panda.

>>38858706
Yes it is

>>38785200
>>38786638
It's sad but this isn't just her problem, a lot of vtubers do this because they believe the only way to get attention is to pander to vshitshow and get lewd models, in the hopes that their clippers will notice them and share a few videos, or that vshitshow themselves will notice them.

The problem overall should be blamed on the clipfags. Because they won't go out their way to share other people, but also not many people want to address the issue overall by making a more noticable platform for the "lesser watched vtubers / other indies".

People only want to look at the likes of Cooksie or https://twitter.com/ENVTubersOOC (a known vshojo shill account) and nobody else. So why not confront THEM as to why they are helping with the decline of western vtubing?

Shizukou is a decent vtuber and could easily get in a corpo if she wanted. I'm surprised she was barely advertised here as she easily could have made /wvt/ or /lig/ fine. And I feel that a corpo move is what will probably happen when she realises the model change hasn't worked out in her favour. She was doing stuff with a few nijis and their orbiters recently. It could easily happen.


>>38792126
No she never took them down:
https://twitter.com/Shizukougames/status/1594688131055460352
https://twitter.com/Shizukougames/status/1594688475621724160