/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>67148409
>>67148612
>>67148726
>>67148739
This is the same shit mentality that MCU fans had post Endgame. "Why do you care that they're changing things up?" And now we have shit like the marvels, she-hulk and echo. I'd rather people be vocal about their unhappiness while they still care, rather than just quietly giving up. There's no going back when the latter happens.

>>55660748
>Anon are you positive you understand what that means? The only outcome those these scenarios you mentioned is returning. I'm curious how you think negotiating a contract is a negative outcome like being suspended would be.

Entering into negotiations, for which you have little leverage, and it being dragged for over a month, is not a positive sign. Cope more, I guess.

>Words have meanings, anon, and the meaning of "semantics" is clearly one that's lost on you. Words with completely different meanings is not semantics.

An overzealous emphasis on so-called meanings to avoid tackling the main issue at hand is exactly that : semantics.

>Lie again >>55655301 Now surely you have something of substance, yes? We wouldn't want you to keep repeating "semantics, semantics!" like a parrot, would we?

I call a spade, a spade. What you're doing is nothing but semantics. If that makes me a parrot, then I'll join you on your little perch. Because you've been evasive with almost every anons in this thread, including myself, giving non-answers to valid questions. "Oh, it's not a suspension even when all things point in that direction, because I say so!"

>Well then, since according to you not being allowed to stream counts as a suspension I guess Cover's been suspending talents left and right for having covid.

Non-sequitur. Covid cases were clearly spelled out in their announcements.

>Which, once again, would make this a nothingburger.

Thanks for making it clear cut : You're just one of those tempigs trying desperately to spin a positive narrative out of these circumstances. You could have just said so from the beginning, and I would have left you alone for the mental patient that you are.

>You've lost.

This isn't some early 2000s gaming forums. We don't self-proclaim "victories" here.

>>55646082
You realize how this can cut both ways, since you posted barely 1 minute after OP made this thread, yes?

>>54768208
And when that happens, I will be happy for them. But as long as they're in hololive, they should respect the company's spirit and the ones who support them tangibly. Is it so fucking hard to be professional in the job you bothered to apply for?

>>44722366
Who the fuck harassed her? People giving their opinion about a chuba's content constitutes "harassment" now? Meanwhile her tweet opened the floodgates and it was hella disgusting to see the libtards and troonies descending onto the field, telling the fandom how the industry should be run and how oh-so-cruel the "idol" industry is.

Fuck off if you think troons and the like are better qualified to give critiques on the chuba industry than the fans themselves, unicorns or otherwise.

>>33783043
Except "sexism" is a serious accusation. A wokester like her should know.

What's next, calling someone a nigger/chink/nip/gook/spic/cracker ironically outside of 4chan? Quit making excuses.