/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>87696502
It is possible if the Corporate Vtubers get their lawyers involved and started contacting Google about their IP addresses, IP provider, Usage and the content infringement. A official claim can and will send a writ of Copyright Infringement with all the account profits that accrued over it's existance to be made foreitured towards the corporate streamer themselves.
If above $10K in terms of profits then its Large Claims. Which can get very very messy for clippers abusing the easy money venue. They can't say "They make the content" because its not transformative in anyway without any vocal insertion over the original material from said corporate Vtuber.
Think Nintendo but ever more Lawyery.

>>86689224
Exactly. IronMouse is a fraudster and like many other *ex-Popular* streamers that lied to their community will further tarnish any sort of reputation between Content Creator and Viewer making it that much more harder to actually make streaming a viable career.

Team Mythic/Vshojo/Nijisanji will ultimately become *BLACK COMPANIES* and no amount of *FAME* would bring them back into White Companies/Legitimate Streamers.

Suggestion: Is a GFE/BFE Streamer playing on a Emulator?
Are they playing a Nintendo Product via Emulation?

Report them!
Nintendo sends lawyers!
Channel gets deleted/Streamer gets sued for Copyright Infringement!

WIN!

>>78978776
I should make this a daily /Undeserving Vtubers/ Thread. /uvt/. I love to hear what 4chan thinks of Vtubers that get all the wealth and instead suggest other minor Vtubers that are more deserving of the fame and recognition.

She's really trying hard with these thumbnails.