[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.81315993 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
81315993

>>81315891
>>81315913
It was a bot?

>> No.79931275 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79931275

>>79930476
No...

>> No.72718230 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
72718230

>>72718066
4. Though I barely passed 5 and probably forgot all my vocab and kanji.

>> No.64074719 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
64074719

>>64060573
>That might be the case for...
I am aware, hence why I said "little perceptible difference" and not "no perceptible difference".
The solutions I thought up are:
>Smaller Dimensions (choosing images with more obvious available placements)
>Downscaling large images (either 8-bit depth instead of 24-bit depth or literally shrinking the image and killing clarity)
>JPG (we've already clarified in-depth the problems)
>aggie.io (idiots might forget to log out before connecting/FFx still can't copy-paste)
>catbox (harder to keep track of/we're an imageboard for god's sake)

I'd say our best bet if we really wanted to keep quality is to use aggie.io, but if someone is aware of a more anon-friendly alternative, I'd like to be made aware of it.

>> No.61882336 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
61882336

>>61882297
You say this as if YouTube isn't just as bad.

>> No.61293075 [View]
File: 61 KB, 290x240, 2w1dk2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
61293075

>>61292921
I've tried baking once. Fucked it up in multiple places. Never again.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]