[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.42440928 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, p2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42440928

I think most Pioneers and Nayufans already know where to go to discuss the diva. My intention with the thread was to try to shill her music to as many new listeners as possible. I think there's a lot of catalog scrollers who might not really know her music outside of the usual songs, and I hoped to lure some shitposters in with the bait-style OP. I don't think many people randomly enter splits on a whim, so I believe that these catalog threads are better for exposure to curious and/or bored people. When glanced at in the catalog, threads that use complex artwork and have a wall of text in the OP don't really stand out as much as the typical white-background-default-pose.jpg threads do in my opinion.

Ideally I would have acquired and posted a list of the songs that have the highest likelihood of getting someone hooked to her music at the start of the thread. However, I haven't had much luck in assembling such a list. One problem with simply asking for favorite songs is that a recommendation from someone who has heard Inochi once might not be as useful as a recommendation from someone who has been listening to everything she's released for many years. There was a poll a few months back that had Sayonara Hero, From A to Z, and Inochi as the thread's most recommended songs, but again, it's difficult to tell if those were informed opinions. For example, nobody voted for Intersection despite the song seeming reasonably popular. I was hoping that the tier lists would help in this regard, or at least help in sparking some discussion. Unfortunately they take forever to do, and often there isn't much to comment on. They don't even prompt "top 3, bottom 3" replies...

I wonder if an AZKi split would be a reasonable option in the future. I don't have any problem posting in /sora/ and /vsinger/, but I think the lack of a centralized place to discuss AZKi means that many people just stick to making passing comments in the faster threads. However, an AZKi thread on its own probably wouldn't survive given her sporadic rate of activity.

In the meantime here's some AZKi pits.

>> No.42107414 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, 1636944055005.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42107414

>>42107358

>> No.40772816 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, 1644122399908.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
40772816

>>40772595

>> No.19825265 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, p2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19825265

>>19824454
I would've liked to see a different pose of a 3D model AZKi instead of art, the illustrations are never as good in my opinion. The Sora they're using filters me pretty hard, maybe an old picture could've been better...

>>19823279
I interpreted >>19822666 and >>19823015 as suggesting that one factor that enables Weiss to have cheaper card packs than Magic is the use of cheaper/reused art. My argument is that the assigned price of a Magic product is primarily dictated by the secondary market value of the cards in that pack, whereas the cost of art is only a minor factor. For example, reprint-only packs (0 new art) are typically more expensive than new set packs (200+ new art), simply because they contain cards in demand and are arbitarily assigned "premium" status to explain the increased price. Another example is the direct-to-consumer ordering, where most sets of around 5 cards (5 new art) sell for $30, whereas a set of very in-demand cards (5 new art) had limited availability and were sold for $200+. There was almost no difference between the two products to warrant the price disparity, except for the fact that people were willing to pay $200+ for them.

>> No.17830937 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, 1644122399908.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17830937

>>17821193

>> No.17821034 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, 1636944055005.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17821034

>>17820984
pitslut

>> No.16528068 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, 1618319455382.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16528068

Go wild

>> No.13009230 [View]
File: 291 KB, 509x509, p2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13009230

>Live at 19:00 JST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2_fe1wtGn0

>AZKi's Top 10 Songs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb_fih6glZk

>/vt/ Approved Songs (Google form)
https://forms.gle/zreq4qjRcMmNuBRs7

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]