/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>23210711
It's both, their price being kept low allows for high % returns , but dividends being capped at least kept them at a not bullshit broken point, but if they really do raise to $4k it's going to become a big problem, and of course they are amazing for hoarding to sell when they spike, and you don't lose from hoarding them thanks to their divs! Truly braindead, really makes angry.
I don't know much about programming but why can't Ms Honk do:
>if music.channel == True and daily.views < Susan Coefficient
>set.behavior == don't go down -10k for the love of god that's all I'm asking
I have no clue if that makes sense at all.
>>23210747
For the $1000 dividend average see >>23210875
You might also look at the F.U.C.K archives for the fact that $4k dividends used to be rare.
As to where the logic comes from I'm afraid I can't share as it's not entirely mine and frankly I don't even know how to really explain some of this stuff, just trust me that it does check out for predictions and dividend spread between coins. If it puts you at ease, most of these deductions and the supporting theory comes from Applause and it did work before ID3 debuted, it might need new calibrations and fine tuning, but it should still hold true for these deductions that are not very specific.

>>18714079
You mean a crash in the market statistics? If that's the case then it was because a week had happened from SORA$ becoming a music channel, same with RBC$ and the restored videos, meaning they crashed down pretty hard.
Same thing happened with MORI$ this week! One of her drops was miss attributed to Susan but in reality it was the first day of Q's views dropping off from the weekly views!