/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>51859604
>>51859438
Both of these points were addressed before with the
>Hololive EN + Hololive EN un-deadbeated, un-chickened, max-sharked, max-tacod (>>46625351)
It had
>Gura and Ina 2021 streams "echoed" in 2022 (repeated as is, one year down the line)
>Mori and Kiara not existing at all

It had both those issues covered
>Mori and Kiara were not part of the chart
>Gura and Ina had their regular 2021 performances repeated in 2022 for argument sake
It doesn't change the trend. It might increase the absolute number but the overall trends remains the same.

>>48530451
We've already seen the chart, you can stop spreading your bullshit. HoloEN could do better, but it's nothing akin to the nonsense you're spewing

>>48491508
>Mori spiral of death and chimkin hours long debuff games are main culprits of HoloEN recline.
This has been addressed
>>48491497
> be if you inserted Gura and Ina's averages (+/- some variability) through November to April?
This as well.

You can see that in this series of posts
>>46614711 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN un-deadbeated, un-chickened
>>46624441 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN max-sharked, max-tacod
>>46625351 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN un-deadbeated, un-chickened, max-sharked, max-tacod

PIc related is the counterfactual **30 days** one that adds Gura and Ina 2021 streams back into 2022, and also removes Mori and Kiara.
Adding and removing people, their presence or absence, nothing changes the overall trend, only the absolute value (which is not relevant when looking at trends).

If a long ranging chart (30 days, 60 days, 365 days) shows a relative movement in the line, be it downward or upward, there is a big set of streams from the whole pushing it in that direction.
Individual streams or streamers can’t change global trends in “balanced” sets like this

>>48387035
Anon, this is a 365 days average, every one of their streams from the past 12 months would still be reflected in the average, they only fall out of range after a full year.

You can see that in this series of posts
>>46614711 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN un-deadbeated, un-chickened
>>46624441 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN max-sharked, max-tacod
>>46625351 :: Hololive EN + Hololive EN un-deadbeated, un-chickened, max-sharked, max-tacod

PIc related is the counterfactual **30 days** one that adds Gura and Ina 2021 streams back into 2022, and also removes Mori and Kiara.
Adding and removing people, their presence or absence, nothing changes the overall trend, only the absolute value (which is not relevant when looking at trends).

>>46624867
>When the rest of the branch gets 7-9k peaks with 6k averages, and the other 2 are streaming to 1-2k people, it doesn’t mean the top half is having the worst points of their life.
These charts are not about absolute values but about trends and it doesn't discriminate between "top performers" and "bottom performers" but about the health of the branch as a whole.
There is a separate chart "per gen" and a separate chart "per streamer" if that's what you are referring to, that not even single one of the streamers are doing badly.

With that said, here is the MOST CHARITABLE COUNTERFACTUAL CHART of all for HoloEN
>Gura and Ina 2021 streams get "echoed" in 2022
>Mori and Kiara do not exist at all
February still ends up being the lowest point since December 2021 and CCVID, the current trend continues to be downward from every point after March 2022

And this is the absolutely most charitable best case scenario for HoloEN, pretending their lowest performers do not exist at all, and amplifying their highest performers with data from one full year prior.
The trend does not change.