/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>70629783
>At the very least, yes, that’s a given, but they could easily be making more than that, which you have no proof of proving.
Lol you just don't want people shitting on them, keep grasping at the last straws you have left.
>(You)r standards for if they should exist or not mean jack shit for anyone, so that’s irrelevant.
Homos not existing will be a better positive for Cover, so yes my standards are correct.
>This is an enormously subjective and impossible to prove take from a biased perspective that means fucking nothing to a corporation.
>You’re likely basing this on your limited perception of a few of the worst ones you’ve seen, and also likely have an over-inflated definition of what it means to “anti” someone.
I have seen enough beggers and have come to understand what kind of subhumans this whole demographic is like picrel.
We don't want these subhumans in the community, constantly attacking the girls and their fanbase with their strawman "unicorns" and "parasocial". Homos and their audiance should be gassed.
>And they’re fucking gone, good riddance to them. And?
Yeah and the rest should follow them because they are all subhumans.

I really try to ignore everything about the fags, but man it pisses me off knowing what kind of subhumans these fags bought in the community.