/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>30019775
>you'd expect more from Tempus
Anon, nobody expected even a regular 2k from them, here is what got posted before they debuted

>>29578573
Here is that pic. Here is the comment that accompanied it (>>28430113)

>>29297904
I'll say the same damn thing. This graph is still true

>>28695301
Best I can do for you

>>28540566
>Honestly they seem like they are going to settle at around a 2-3k range, same as noctyx.
I have a range of "success", "failure" and "neither" for them

>Failure: get outranked by Roberu, Astel and one more Holostar
>Success: outranks even a single Noctyx

I expect them to fall in between, but I didn't expect Luxiem to go anywhere so, yeah

>>28428474
>What minimum CCV(debut and average) would it take for you guys to consider Tempus a success overall?
Here is a table with the true average of CCV for all of the tracked male vtubers in the usual sites.

There are two lines there as well
>Success line: outrank at least one of the Noctyx
>Failure line: get outranked by Roberu, Astel and one more Holostar

I genuinely expect them to fall in between these two zones but if even one of them breach the
>Fulgur line
it would already be a magnificent success