/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>43279972
I take that back.
>>43279898
>For goodshit model schizoprompts were a must imo
No, they weren't. Skill issue...
bad prompt embed is just as much of a meme as the schizo negative
This was one of the only "good" images I got with schizonegatives on goodshit. And I had to Photoshop it. A lot. They definitely give a certain "look", but it's rarely better than a set of negatives that is 1. good for the model you're using 2. good for whatever context requires because of your positive prompt. It's the same thing if you're dumping 1000 tokens in the positive or negative prompt. The clusterfuck that generates is INTERESTING, sure, but I wouldn't call it good. It's the prompting equivalent of shitposting.
t. regularly uses positive prompts that are so long they would send an entire thread to bump limit
>>43280236
I actually usually "him", especially here. But when I have a github window open....
Anybody prompting the kind of shit we do is either a red-blooded male or a woman so gay she might as well be a dude.

>>40510615
>>40510661
it's OK when it works, but it makes the gangliest fucking broken knuckles most of the time, and an extra finger or two when you're lucky that take all of two minutes to fix with homoshop https://litter.catbox.moe/2xyzpc.png
it also gets less fucky the more you have in your actual prompt, bizarrely enough
>>40510908
no amount of photoshop will fix that

jesus, you guys are speed running these
>>40027439
>>39954445
here you go
https://litter.catbox.moe/w5nhes.zip