/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>75394333
I really can't, though somehow others have it worse than us.

What are you working on, anons?

>>28450626
Tsk, you were supposed to be sleeping. Finish your company Rentry, dammit.

>>20417614
I haven't checked inflation rate over time from the past month. I can tell you that the rate doubled between the two weeks before and two weeks after the update. It remains around the same level as the one after the update, so I'd say that maybe it's slightly increasing?

>>17235678
Not a bad idea, but before you get stormed by hordes of yes-men let me point out some things you have to consider in order for the scheme to be successful. Consider it tough love because I don't want it to flop, a newfag investment scheme would be great for promising new players.

1.) You need to factor in risk. I assume that you are not doing it pro bono - if you are, ignore this point. In Nasfaq, there are no contracts or legal obligations, repaying the loan would be entirely up to the person who took it. Even if you are convinced that 9 out of 10 people taking a loan will repay it, that single person who wouldn't would cut very deep into the profits of the scheme, and due to inability to act on it could encourage further cases of fraud.
The idea of a collateral isn't a bad one, but hats usually sell for 100k-200k outside of special cases, which means that defrauding the money is still more profitable.

2.) You need to factor in taxes. In your example, your total profit would be... just 44k, assuming you pay them 526k (so they receive 500k) and they pay back 600k (meaning you receive 570k). You can of course make the loan-taker pay all the taxes, but that makes the scheme less attractive.
Generally speaking, this would be devastating for a single-week length deals, so you should consider only doing this scheme for longer time periods, such as 4-5 weeks.

3.) I'm not sure if basing it off dividends is a smart choice when talking about newfags, since the main differentiating factor are profits from adjustment trading. Total net worth change % or change in wallet composition times average coin price would be a better indicator for it, but you'd need smaller rates than stake in portfolio for it to be profitable for newhags also.

4.) Linked to 3., you should probably make some kind of floor- or thread-based application process to see their networth grow and trading performance.

There's a reason why loaning was considered but overall didn't take root, mostly due to 1.) and 2.), but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't try with newfags instead of established players, who can easily triple their net worths in a week, meaning there's a higher potential reward for loaning, even at a risk. I wish you luck in the scheme regardless.

>>15158618
That assumes that no matter how many Santa hats you craft, you'll still have the same demand, which is obviously untrue when you have maybe 1-2 dedicated hat collectors. You can write a program to brute-force all Christmas-y words while engaging in long and drawn out fights at auctions to get the hats you need... for what? 23 million? You can make this much through Mahjong.
>>15159181
It's actually hiragana, you fell for it twice.

>>14590644
Large positions themselves are okay, I think. The issue now is that a) there isn't that big of a difference in coin dividends, so it's harder to edge out other players, b) there isn't that big of a difference in buying/selling prices at adjustments, which, again, makes it harder to edge out other players even if you hypothetically made better trades than them. Volatility increase increases the portion of money made by swing-trading, which is a lot more active and differentiating than dividends into which players are basically forced to rely on in the late-game.

>>14407966
Why do you think they will experience two more drops? Some kind of a weighted rolling average component?
honk set those coins not to adjust for sure, but the question is, are the stats still recorded and influencing the black magic formulae, or are they just scrubbed clean?

For the record, using some smoke divination I've estimated for the past week's dividends to have been around $3000-4000 on average for the HoloX coins. That is, if my hypothesis is correct, which is shaky at best.