/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>20307838
There's only so much Cover can do in comparison to a label. They don't seem to be marketing their albums that well, probably because of the money, and there's also the preferential treatment. A record label doesn't care about it, but for Cover to choose one holo or the other may give a bad image

In an alternate universe where you're in a relationship with Suityan, what would you do if you were both out on a date with each other?

>>13694186
The definition is set by the person using it. If they claim themselves to be one, they are one.
>>13694255
The person defining themselves takes priority over people disagreeing. You only need one person willing to agree with you to make it "true."
I've been workshopping my explanation, so here's a way that may make sense.
This may be stupid, but think of it like a Warlock and a Patron Diety. If the Patron Diety claims itself to be something, and the Warlock worships it for power, then the thing gains power and legitimacy from the fact that it is worshiped as such. Even if it's considered a heretical being or a myth by others, the fact that the Warlock made a pact with it is proof of it being true.
In a similar vein, an idol defines themselves as such, and makes pacts with fans for support in exchange for community, or whatever it is they offer. Even if people deny it to be true, that person's pact stands as proof of it being so.

Consider:
Suisex