[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.41822572 [View]
File: 52 KB, 414x600, CuteLize15!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
41822572

On voting reform:
Sure, the idea and proposal are fine to me. No system is flawless, and this one has ones that have been pointed out.

However, I cannot separate the fact that this was pushed so hard for like 3 days and when it comes up now, no one even bothers to discuss it. The truth is most of the issues of this thread come down to the perception of others and the assumption of wicked intent or something of the sort by many that gets thrown at people like me over small matters. The issues with both the current system and the proposal are the same in reality. It's all about assuming the worst about things, wanting to make a failsafe method and problems that frankly do not exist.

Do you really want to know the biggest problem with the proposal? Most anons, truthfully, don't have strong opinions on matters and therefore either just go "Yeah sounds good to me." or don't vote. There really isn't a major problem with the current system aside from this thread's on misconceptions about reps. I support the regions SOLELY to fix that issue since as has been mentioned, the idea that voting should be tied to one person per nation/region/whatever is the root of many concerns. While it is true that I believe local things like placement and borders should be done regionally, I don't think that this system particularly is the only way to make that possible.


I am voting in favour of this solely to destroy the writer =/= vote concept, and furthermore IF ANYTHING, we can test this out for one vote to see what happens. Does that sound reasonable to at least see how a system works in practice before we use it? Heck, try it this vote!!!! See what happens.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]