/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>71446155
Ehhhh... spoon match? /wvt/ are REALLY that bad??? It's time for another close Bra7i1.

>>70901636
There's totally no way of saving wack vitriolic tumors. We are just losers and schizos who ruin, like, everything. Why would a geek like you think you could Trunp weeveetee? Someone had to do the negative nancy bit.
In all seriousness , /wvt/ can be made "great again" via one of two ways.
>emphasise the community aspects and creatives of the thread.
The thread was fun because there was a lot of positivity around. While anons didn't necessarily know who was posting, people generally liked each other. Now, there's a lot more skepticism and distrust with anons in the thread which makes it less fun. There is also a larger bad shitpost to normal post ratio which becomes annoying. To remedy this, a large effort should be made to make the thread fun. This will increase the thread activity and will make people less likely to entertain bad faith posts as there will be numerous other posts which overshadow them.
To increase positivity, stuff like: emphasising the aggie; doing more liveposting for popular livestreams; doing poals and; doing community cytube stuff will do wonders in making more anons happy to post.
>complete and utter destruction of the thread and removal of every single anon associated with
This is a last resort. The thread hasn't reached the point where this is the reasonable option yet. However, my point will act like it has gotten to that state.
This the great reset mentality. While there are a lot of great anons here, they have gotten too used to how the thread currently is. Thus they'll not be effective in making the thread great. The awful ones are too addicted to here to leave and thus the thread needs to be purged with them. You can see this method working out in the numerous threads that /wvt/ has birthed. They've gotten significantly better in some aspects than /wvt/ is.

>>70158093
>unironic poal about being "not npc" pilled
>has blackpill but not whitepill
>doesn't have a discussion tab
Heh.