/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>31727801
Nope. If they don't look small and child-like, they're not lolis.

>>10680101
I get what you're saying and the names for the labels are wrong but the dates are kinda accurate. I definitely noticed different kinds of newfags during those periods.
>2006 and earlier were all gigaweebs that are probably still hikkiNEETs to this day while lamenting how much the internet has changed and how they wish they could go back to those good old days.
>2007-2009 were /v/irgins who just came to actually talk about video games or underage /b/tards looking for jailbait pictures. Most of them did learn to lurk and assimilated properly into oldfags over time.
>2010-2012 were /adv/, /r9k/, etc tourists who thought 4chan was a dating site and just used it to make friends, pretty much going entirely against the purpose of anonymity. Most of them are now discordfags or became incels and moved to reddit.
>2013 onwards are gamergate tourists and /pol/tards who just came here because they were ostracized from every other social media platform. They're still fucking faggots and never bothered to lurk because they don't respect this site's history, to them it's just another place to argue about politics. They have no interest in anime or video games or anything but attaching themselves to a pet ideology.

Now this is in very broad terms and there's obviously outliers, but it's definitely obvious that every new generation of newfags is worse than the last. 2007 was the only generation that actually assimilated properly after lurking.