/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>39269230
>>39269374
I think we all agree on that. A story is allowed to be as biased or unreliable as it wants to be.
>>39269609
Stories are lore only as far as an objective and clear cut Yes and No can be taken from them, or at least that's how I view it. Lore as I understand it, is representative of a clear cut truth about a thing, event, or place, even if you write something like "some have varying views on whether or not such and such occured" that is still lore in terms of describing the views of people rather than an event itself.
A story can represent pieces of canonical lore but I don't see stories themselves as being equal or substitutable with lore due to the confusion that would occur in terms of how different things can be interpreted based on whose point of view it comes from.
>>39269679
Not sure. Don't really care.

>>38715562
a little detail gives things alot of life, plus it gets the thread's blood moving so its not just rentry lore posts followed by a series of bumps. I'm gonna enjoy seeing how /hag/ shapes up with all this

>>37474769
Divine Authority of Nuts is a superior title to emperor nanora.

'suners, what is the state of /risu/'s literacy? Do you guys have a library and stuff, nanora?

>>33337114
>I'm going to argue against against this on the grounds that you really shouldn't be writing lore for unrepped neighbours full stop. It creates a lot of dubious lore (lore that will be potentially damaging to the future writing of people who are actually from that thread) and setting a president for it creates massive potential for power playing
Has this ever been a problem at all so far, nanora? I haven't heard about any reps complaining that the lore they had was dubious or of arguments between old lore and new lore, the only thing that comes to mind is the other rosebud and even then that wasn't a real issue since they just talked about what they'd use and compromised.

>>32536086
hmph! Good to finally get some respect around here nanora!