/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

I have analyzed this little piece of the picture because it's the hardest one to fake, and also the one that makes least sense to fake. It adds nothing to the picture, and no-one setting out to fake an interaction would add a random deglossing of emote reactions by people not even involved in the subject.
Pixel count is consistent.
The distortion is consistent to the rest of the picture's resolution
The noise follows the same patterns of artifact shadings

This is real. This thing is real.
t. I work in graphic design upscaling things to be printed properly in advertising

I have analyzed this little piece of the picture because it's the hardest one to fake, and also the one that makes least sense to fake. It adds nothing to the picture, and no-one setting out to fake an interaction would add a random deglossing of emote reactions by people not even involved in the subject.
Pixel count is consitent.
The distortion is consistent to the rest of the picture's resolution
The noise follows the same patterns of artifact shadings

This is real. This things is real.
t. i work in graphic design upscaling things to be printed properly in advertising

Of course it can be fake, but is this detail too much?