/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>26022597
So what keeps people here then? Why does it seem that people would rather be exposed to intentional bad actors than go to another website where most forms of negative speech assumed to be from bad actors and moderated out of existence? Maybe it's because despite it's rough edges, people recognise that the former produces less neuroticism than the latter. For all we think we're fucked up here, it's just because we don't hide it behind a veneer of political correctness. Elsewhere is another story.

>>8616164
Because every industry they infiltrate needs to engage these men pretending to be women with undue reverence, use their bastardised language and take part in a farce that they are real women. If they are not seen to be complying then the brainwashed masses will start seeing them as "not letting people be who they truly are", and big companies that like to play it safe don't want that. So they play along with the farce and kick anyone out who doesn't engage in it.

Has she got to the domestic terrorist cameo part of the game yet? I'm really dreading it.