[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.91069412 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
91069412

>>91069311
>>91069373
At least try to conceal your samefagging.

>> No.82795440 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718248783572370.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
82795440

>>82794839
Putting aside that nobody actually said that and you're putting words in peoples' mouths again, that's also not a cope, because you didn't point out any contradiction.
Just because someone intends to stream, doesn't mean they stream. Period.

>> No.80674071 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718248783572370.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
80674071

>>80673045
If you think an obviously and self-evidently Gura-related ritualpost isn't related to Gura, then you have many problems, none of which are our responsibility or concern.
Fuck off, please.

>> No.80017793 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
80017793

>Jobhtani

>> No.79760296 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1716325800784745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79760296

Is it an actual Chumbuds with zero self control replying to our schizo larper or is it samefagging?

>> No.79406571 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79406571

>>79406244
>then went back to China only a few years later
You're just gonna post lies like that on the internet?

>> No.79302709 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1707902220682329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79302709

>> No.79231153 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718248783572370.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79231153

>>79228741
You *are* ESL, and apparently not half as learned as you seem to think you are - even after I went through the trouble of spoonfeeding you the meaning of the "objective/subjective" distinction.
Read back through this post >>79222866, nice and slow, and maybe you'll start to see what I'm getting at.
>Music follows music theory
>Therefore music is inherently rational
Hilariously false, pathetically transparent Vienna Circle brainrot. This is the equivalent of arguing that because human biology and anatomy exists in the physical world, the entirety of the human experience is just Le Chemical Reaction, when anybody with noumenon and qualia can immediately understand why that is completely fucking idiotic.
Structuring musical composition according to the traditions, methods and organic practices of a particular culture, in a way that CAN be analyzed on a theoretical and abstract rationalistic level, doesn't magically change the fact that music is inherently, at the most fundamental level, sentimental, and therefore, necessarily, NOT rational. Understanding the physical mechanism, in theory, does not in any way negate the metaphysical experience which humans actually have, in REALITY.
>Your argument is SUBJECTIVE
THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT, you, insipid, unbearably fucking braindead Reddit tourist MORON. That you continue to obsess over "objectivity" demonstrates just how doxastically strangulated and irredeemably brainwashed you are by post-enlightenment ideology, to the point that you are apparently totally incapable of grasping the fact that NOT EVERYTHING IS *SUPPOSED* TO BE OBJECTIVE. If the only objective way to compare singers is INSUFFICIENT TO LEAD YOU TO AN ACTUAL MEANINGFUL CONCLUSION beyond merely measuring the characteristics of the singers' voices, then maybe you should put two and two together and come to the obvious conclusion that you are need to, and SHOULD, compare these things SUBJECTIVELY. The fact that sentimental value is "vague" and not a "comparable theory" is completely fucking irrelevant, because they are still undeniably, factually real and still factually matter over all other considerations, seeing as technical ability's significance, in and of itself, is a function of HOW IT ULTIMATELY AFFECTS THE SENTIMENT OF THE LISTENER.
Only a fucking retarded, uncultured, underaged moron who has next to zero life experience would think that technical singing ability matters more than being a good singer itself, JUST because it is objectively measurable. That's like arguing that having high-quality construction materials matters more than having a good house. YES, ultimately subjective metrics are the only ones that matter, and to deny this fact is to fundamentally misunderstand what music even IS, let alone its FUNCTION.
>You are le... HUMAN BEING, WOOOooooOOOooo spooky
Imagine LARPing as a brainless automaton to argue that experiential human cultural practices like singing should only be discussed objectively... for some inexplicable reason

>> No.79218031 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79218031

I thought this was supposed to be a kamige, wtf is this boss fight?

>> No.79123737 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79123737

Do JOP nijisisters actually like this tournoslop?

>> No.79105226 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1716325800784745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
79105226

>>79103938
It's honestly mind blowing that there are so many people here trying to defend Fauna after
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tyyyLvXVaY&t=8986s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUvdnKuBMDQ&t=7630s
They are literally dogpiling Gura, calling her a liar, and saying she doesn't stream. And so it was okay what Fauna did and they didn't want the dark souls race anyway.
I feel like we're being raided and I along with only a couple others are the only ones not living in clown world.
Why are these "chumbuds" trying to deny what Gura said?

>> No.78484471 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
78484471

>>78483963
I wondered where those faggot have gone...

>> No.78303784 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1718541842122020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
78303784

>>78303628

>> No.76994714 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1716339116904830.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
76994714

>>76993601
Nope. Oppai loli is an abomination and refering to real people as loli is cringe. Your friend was right to look at you that way.
Though I agree that lolibaba are loli. I was just trying to show it's not strictly based on age.
That's why Dizzy from Guilty Gear is not a loli.

>> No.76863981 [View]
File: 297 KB, 1000x1123, 1716222690309047.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
76863981

>>76861023
First. I'm older than you.
Second, are you catholic, anon? Is that what this is? Is that where this guilt is coming from?
Because I forgot about the religious angle that seems to be the source of your unease with it.
Here's the thing, though. You're acting as if people's only, or even just their main reason to find a wife, is to get laid. But you're not going to find any meaningful relationships that way. Your hand isn't going to have a conversation with you or share experiences with you.
I'll go ahead and give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you know that already, so that means you're preaching one of two things: A) speedrun dating and get married to the first woman you meet (terrible idea doomed for failure) or B) become a monk and free yourself from all sexual desire during the years you spend trying to find a wife (unrealistic and unhealthy).

That anon cranking one out before he goes to bed or whatever isn't really this life-destroying, self-destructive hedonism that engulfs his entire life like you're portraying it as.
And honestly? Your insistance otherwise is kinda cringe because it just sorta sounds like you're scared to touch your own penis, lest your life fall apart and your future spiral into calamity.
Touching your dick isn't going to make you gay, anon.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]