/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>28025492
Okay, so I'm going to keep things simple for this post and go through the assumptions I made about the system and how it would act in practice. Then we can start refining things from there and hopefully catch any misunderstandings I made early on. At first, I defined things in terms of broadness and presence, but since those are negatively proportional to our radius, I'm going to switch to their antonyms, specificity and disparity. These will be represented by the variables s and d and can just be thought of as the respective reciprocals of broadness and presence. All this really does is make the equations easier to read. Our other variables will be r for the radius, h for the height, and V for the volume of a given concept's cylindrical container. We'll also have the constants p for pi and e for Euler's number.
Going back through paragraphsanon's previous posts on the topic, it seems like we want a system where decreasing specificity exponentially decreases the radius, decreasing the disparity increases the height, and the fuel's mass is held constant. I will be using a constant volume in place of mass since that is more easily represented in terms of our variables (V=pr^2h). Assuming a consistent density, this doesn't change anything.
This leads us to our base equations for radius and height: r=de^-s and h=V/(pr^2). The radius equation gives us an exponential relationship between r and s, and the inclusion of d as a factor lets it affect the height. The height equation is just the volume formula solved for h. There's a lot that can be fiddled with in these formulas depending on the exact relationships we want, but they should be somewhat similar to this at their core unless I'm misunderstanding what we want to achieve.
Paragraphsanon also mentioned that the specificity could be assumed constant for a fixed concept while the disparity might change over time. Taking this into account, we get the following derivatives (rates) for r and h: r'=d'e^-s=rd'/d and h'=-2hr'/r=-2hd'/d.
Now let's take a look at some examples. Taking the moon as our concept, where its various phases affect its disparity, we get a smaller height during a new moon which corresponds to a larger radius, and vice-versa for a full moon. This means that chuubanite relying on this concept would have stronger, shorter effects with a new moon and weaker, longer-lasting effects when the moon is full. Since the fuel is held constant, the energy obtained should be the same, but the power and duration will change. I assume all concepts will have the same volume for balancing, in which case none is inherently stronger than another, but some are better suited to certain effects.
Switching our focus to rosestone gives us another example of this in action. I believe it was stated that rosestones normally emit light but can be adjusted to cause sparks and explosions. What this would amount to is changing the glyphs on the chuubanite in order to further specify the concept. This allows you to switch from a low-powered, long-lasting light source to a high-powered, short-lasting explosive.
It also occurs to me that we may not want to enforce such a strict "constant energy output" requirement on our writers, in which case we would need to either drop constant volume (which I imagine could potentially lead to other issues) or have the black-box mechanism which converts concept energy to physical energy adjust things as necessary. In this case, instead of thinking in terms of constant energy with varying power, we would have constant fuel with varying fuel rate.
Paragraphsanon, I was also curious if you had anything in mind when you came up with your original formulas. I didn't really see a way to slide them in at this juncture, but maybe I'm overlooking something. In any case, these formulas are meant to be a base to start from, assuming I didn't misinterpret anything. More factors and variables can be added in as needed, and hopefully we can come out of this with something that works and doesn't make people want to blow their brains out when reading it.

>>20967838
...but you can get that directly from the songs, because she's a fantastic lyricist. That's a big part of why her debut EP popped off even though she had barely started streaming.

>>19101022
>giving her shit advice so she spends hours failing and loses views
Rrat confirmed

>only breakup songs
Okay, I'm lost. Is this tsundere GFE or anti-idol cuck bucking or a falseflag normalfag red flag?
What's the rrat here?

>>18029207
I honestly don't understand why streaming everyday is taken as some kind of holy grail.
Do you have nothing else to do? Do you not WANT your favorite streamer to take days off to pursue other projects and broaden their experiences?
For corpofags especially, how the fuck are you RUNNING OUT of things to watch, let alone blaming that on the person delivering that content?

>>16844085
Okay, so if Tokomachi Radio became available on Apple Podcasts tomorrow, you'd want Suisei to graduate?
And if you're getting your definition of drama-free from fucking /vt/ then you're gonna have to watch 2views for the rest of your life because every other vtuber has had drama manufactured about them

only good post i've seen all day desu

>>16099136
>he thinks numbers are real

82 of these lists are loaded in
I'll do the remaining 70 when I wake up tomorrow. If the thread dies I'll just make a new one with the graph
But for now I cannot bear to look at another one of these goddamn elongated tier lists
I hate you all.
>>12843809
>>12844770
>>12866328
>>12857642
>>12871526
>>12894607
>>12910641
>>12850086
>>12866806
Except you guys, you're alright

>>11874381
Was thinking my ex was pretty funny but really it was that funny things happened when she was around.
Like one time there was this puppy running across a muddy field and all of a sudden it disappears under a puddle. Hilarious.

>>11795107
>Kiara sucks
>But deadbeats suck just as bad

>>10923800
>"I was told by my manager not to change it"
>Doesn't change it
How is that her manager's fault?

>>9486024
>200 million
>10% of that is still 10million.

>>6949270
/teehee/ descends into bickering with the Nephamily over whether or not their oshi should have stayed in the collab ban instead of joining this stream. The Inakama stir shit on both sides, just like they do in every other timeline