/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>27443841
This response is already a lot better than your usual! ...Right up until the part where you said "in other words, I think they would have to be retarded." That, right there. Those are the kinds of statements that make people misunderstand you. You could have ended the sentence on "no system would rationally stick to such an idea." and have been perfectly fine.

>what is the structural connection between being outdated and causing confusion?
The document is so outdated as to be riddled with statements that are no longer true. The cause of the confusion is that newcomers read the document, make lore based on their understanding of chuubanite from that document, and then when presenting that lore to the thread are told that their use of chuubanite is all wrong. This makes them feel like chuubanite is nonsensical and they give up on understanding it. I don't think the mere concept of chuubanite is too complicated, I think the documents are unnecessarily verbose.

While it's fine for the detailed explanation to exist so that chuubanite autists like you can have the detailed understanding of how it works and how to make everything fit in with the world, you have to understand that being confronted with a massive wall of text is off-putting to people who just want to write for fun. Chuubanite logic is fun to you, but not everyone thinks theoretical physics are fun. The doc must open with a simple explanation of chuubanite, taking up no more than perhaps one or two paragraphs. The rest of the document can then have whatever complicated explanation you want, but the important thing here is that the information must be both complete and factually true. Things that have been retconned, such as the transmutation system, cannot be left in the document. This is way to prevent simple questions like /2434/ rep's question on chuubanite affinities from spiraling in to timeloops, because then people could simply point to the document and say, "Yeah, check X section. Chuubanite has affinities for different concepts, and chuubas can be concepts, so your chuubanite can have lots of different affinities," without someone else chiming in to say, "Actually, section X isn't true and your chuubanite can't do that." Again, it's the mere fact that the documents are outdated, causing all anons to have incomplete and inaccurate understandings of chuubanite, that causes these timeloops. Updating the document will fix a lot of these problems.