/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>71674139
>The general behavior of the guys in JP is nowhere near the behavior of Luxiem.
Come on, for fuck sake, the whole reason the "offpako" incident killed the girls careers and turned Nijisanji into "manjisanji" was because the guys involved egged on the girls antis and made fun of the girls audiences while the girls were doing their best to damage control and try to reassure their audience.
I maintain that your opinion is likely out of lack of information about the JP side and out of trying to rationalize falling for the "NijiEN is HoloEN-lite" meme instead of recognizing early on that there was no other possibly timeline other than NijiEN being "Nijisanji, but in English"

Here is from last thread
>Nijisanji vs. Hololive, japanese branches, *mean average of peaks*, march 2019 to february 2024

>>70771338
>Where's the graph that shows all of Cover and Niji's averages over time
Oh, yeah, "that" chart.

Here it is, the OLDEST SURVIVING CONTINUOUS NUMBERFAGGING RECORD with almost the full story of both companies going back to March 2019
>MEAN AVERAGE OF PEAK CCV, MARCH 2019 TO FEBRUARY 2024

That's five full years of history of numbers but, unfortunately, it has the WORST metric
>the mean of peaks
aka the "average of peaks". (sum of peaks / number of streams)
(That, incidentally, is the reason today the average is labelled "true average", to differentiate to the way the average was calculated back then)

Anyway, here are the possible takes
1) It is possible to see in this chart EXACTLY when Hololive took off massively (around the debuts of gen4)
2) It is also possible to see when Nijisanji became "manjisanji" (around the same time)
3) Hololive came really close of beating the impossibly high average of peaks of November 2020 now in Jan 2024 (something thought pretty much impossible because of the algo change)
4) NijiJP spent most of 2023 and early 2024 batting at the same range they used to in 2019(!) with their girls currently batting BELOW their 2019 metrics and their boys, on their Jan 2020 metrics

This is not a good metric in either case, reason for which it got superseded by the "true average" but it is a nice time capsule