/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>42544110


>educate yourself
Context was fishcloaca being an npc female zoomer (but I repeat myself) groomed by her twitter 'friends' and thus being performatively outraged over people using the word trap when talking about traps without really understanding anything about what she's doing. Like anything tangentially related to progroidism, it is all lies intended to hurt you by default.

>improve yourself
This is a multi-layered one.
On one layer, Ame telling her goslings uncomfortable with the possibility of on-stream chemistry with male streamers to stop being goslings is basically asking for herself to be put out of a job.
Consider this: porn already exists, so how did vtubing get such a markershare?
Likewise, all kinds of different streamers, video makers, and other content creators already existed, so again, how did the novel market of vtubing explode in such a big way?
Whereas porn is a simulacrum standing in for lack of sex, the market advantage of vtubing is that it is a simulacrum standing in for lack of wife, or husband, or friends.
The parasocial aspect of streaming in general, as compared to other forms of media, rather than being a contingency or accident as sometimes implied by sociopathic twitteraddicts, is in fact something essential to the medium itself. It is always there in some form of another, which is one of the main drivers of its popularity in the current world - and also why things that undermine this aspect are always the fastest way for a streamer to undermine themselves.

A second, more meta layer to this is, even when someone is in fact trying to have a wife in reality and start a family in reality and be part of a band of brothers in reality with a purpose in life doing something valuable for their patrimony in reality - and thus lose most of their motivation for watching Ame and giving her their money - there are no *individual* solutions that are sufficient for everyone to accomplish this, because the structure of their world itself is precluded against it. We are faced with the fact that many *can't* get these things anyways, regardless of 'improvement' - doesn't matter how rich or attractive they are, not even the likes of Jeff Bezos or Tom Brady can save themselves from divorcerape - leaving only organized action on a collective scale to deconstruct that structure and replace it with new architects as sufficient. So there is also a wrongfootedness to it in the sense that it is basically a case of kicking down on people who have little to no possibility of having what one says they should have anyways.

In more civilized times the husband of an adulterer has the right to kill both the man and the woman involved. Since a streamer is only their virtual boo, this means likewise there are only virtual stonings. The fact that they are not actually your wife/husband/whatever is of course technically arguable, but like noted above, misses the core spirit of the dynamics, even if the degrees are different. If a streamer doesn't owe their audience anything, the audience likewise doesn't owe the streamer anything. That is basically the core problem of all these different attempts to gaslight simps into continuing to be paypigs regardless of what their findoms do.