/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>78427005
>Didn't they release a financial report literally a few weeks ago saying they were going to focus more on the current brand/Talents?
They did not. What they said was (and I quote verbatim)
>With respect to VTuber portfolios, we realize that we are graduating from a phase of making an increase in revenue and profit by increasing the number of VTubers.
>Instead of that, we are considering expanding the scale of revenue from the whole business by expanding the degree of recognition per VTuber IP and increasing profitability.
Unless you lack the reading comprehension, it’s easy to understand the meaning: Cover is no longer depending solely on increasing the size of the cast to achieve greater revenue because they’re focusing on improving the revenue per channel
Nowhere they say they won’t be debuting any new gen

>>78388801
That’s because that’s not what they said, which was (and I quote verbatim)
>With respect to VTuber portfolios, we realize that we are graduating from a phase of making an increase in revenue and profit by increasing the number of VTubers.
>Instead of that, we are considering expanding the scale of revenue from the whole business by expanding the degree of recognition per VTuber IP and increasing profitability.
What he literally said was “the era of ACCELERATE for greater profit is over”