/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>13624980
>Not according to the authorities involved
The only authority involved was the cybersecurity guy.

If there was a law enforcement request, the cybersecurity guy would have said "hey, law enforcement says you shouldn't do this", and the discussion would have ended there.

>and it certanly isn't Nux's call
Nux got phished, and from the word's of the cybersecurity guy in >>13621530 : "I am not saying this as a criticism of whether or not you should do a video, that is entirely your right to do so as a victim and we don't have a problem with that".

So the cybersecurity guy yet again disagrees with you.

>And now they know, than you Batman Joker
This is trivial knowledge for an attacker. There's a reason the cybersecurity guy didn't request changes.

>And did NOT "okay" the upload, no matter how many times you try to say that. There's screencaps and everyone can verify
Nux asked him to look at the video in https://files.catbox.moe/16ttt6.jpg . Cybersecurity guy says okay thanks.

Pic related is his review. He asked for changes to blur a name and downplay notoriety. He did not request to remove the bit where Nux talks about usernames and OnlyFans.