/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

It's pretty apparent to me at least. Cover wanted a reason to terminate her because they figured that her brand was significantly damaged. They dug through her communications through her work accounts. They eventually found something that technically counted as a breach of contract. They fired her for it and worded the public notice of her termination ominously and vaguely as though she had done something serious. It was probably nothing more than the usual blowing off steam that most people do, but she spilled some tea that counted as an NDA breach.

This allowed Cover to get rid of her in a way that made it look like she had done something serious enough to be worth firing her.

>b-but how do you know

I'm not a fucking hikki-NEET and I've worked for big corporations before. It's pretty obvious that they went through her communications with a fine toothed comb in an effort to find a pretext to fire her after the incident. They can usually find something if they want to. That is why they would go through her communications in the first place. They had made the decision to terminate her contract before they found what they were already looking for.